Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Affective Disorder | Study protocol

Patient-reported outcome measures for monitoring primary care patients with depression (PROMDEP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Tony Kendrick, Michael Moore, Geraldine Leydon, Beth Stuart, Adam W. A. Geraghty, Guiqing Yao, Glyn Lewis, Gareth Griffiths, Carl May, Rachel Dewar-Haggart, Samantha Williams, Shihua Zhu, Christopher Dowrick

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Benefits to patients from reduced depression have been shown from monitoring progress with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in psychological therapy and mental health settings. This approach has not yet been researched in the United Kingdom for primary care, which is where most people with depression are treated in the United Kingdom.

Methods

This is a parallel-group cluster randomised trial with 1:1 allocation to intervention and control. Patients who are age 18+ years, with a new episode of depressive disorder/symptoms, meet the inclusion criteria. Patients with current depression treatment, comorbid dementia/psychosis/substance misuse/suicidal ideas are excluded. The intervention includes the Administration of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a PROM within 2 weeks of diagnosis and at follow-up 4 weeks later. General practitioners are trained in interpreting scores and asked to take them into account in their treatment decisions. Patients are given written feedback on scores and suggested treatments. The primary outcome measure is Depression on the Beck Depression Inventory BDI-II at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include BDI-II at 26 weeks, changes in drug treatments and referrals, social functioning (Work & Social Adjustment Scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D) at 12 and 26 weeks, service use over 26 weeks (modified Client Services Receipt Inventory) to calculate NHS costs, and patient satisfaction at 26 weeks (Medical Informant Satisfaction Scale). The sample includes 676 total participants from 113 practices across three centres. Randomisation is achieved by computerised sequence generation. Blinding is impossible given the nature of the intervention (self-report outcome measures prevent rating bias). Differences at 12 and 26 weeks between intervention and controls in depression, social functioning and quality of life are analysed using linear mixed models, adjusted for socio-demographics, baseline depression, anxiety, and clustering, while including practice as a random effect. Patient satisfaction, quality of life (QALYs) and costs over 26 weeks will be compared between arms. Qualitative process analysis includes interviews with 15–20 GP/NPs and 15–20 patients per arm to reflect trial results and implementation issues, using Normalization Process Theory as a theoretical framework.

Discussion

If PROMs are helpful in improving patient outcomes for depression even to a small extent, then they are likely to be good value for money, given their low cost. The benefits could be considerable, given that depression is common, disabling, and costly.

Trial registration

ISRCTN no:​ 17299295. Registered 1st October 2018.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Kendrick T, King F, Albertella L, Smith PW. GP treatment decisions for patients with depression: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:280–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Kendrick T, King F, Albertella L, Smith PW. GP treatment decisions for patients with depression: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:280–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Dowrick C, Leydon GM, McBride A, et al. Patients’ and doctors’ views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study. BMJ. 2009;338(7697):1–9. Dowrick C, Leydon GM, McBride A, et al. Patients’ and doctors’ views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study. BMJ. 2009;338(7697):1–9.
7.
go back to reference McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha T, editors. Mental health and wellbeing in England: adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2016. McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha T, editors. Mental health and wellbeing in England: adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2016.
8.
go back to reference McCrone P, Dhanasiri S, Patel A, Knapp M. Paying the price: the cost of mental health care in England to 2026. London: King’s Fund; 2008. McCrone P, Dhanasiri S, Patel A, Knapp M. Paying the price: the cost of mental health care in England to 2026. London: King’s Fund; 2008.
10.
go back to reference Kendrick T, Dowrick C, McBride A, et al. Management of depression in UK general practice in relation to scores on depression severity questionnaires: analysis of medical record data. BMJ. 2009;338:b750.CrossRefPubMed Kendrick T, Dowrick C, McBride A, et al. Management of depression in UK general practice in relation to scores on depression severity questionnaires: analysis of medical record data. BMJ. 2009;338:b750.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998;82:1904–8.CrossRefPubMed Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998;82:1904–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ashworth M, Robinson S, Godfrey E, et al. Measuring mental health outcomes in primary care: the psychometric properties of a new patient-generated. outcome measure, ‘PSYCHLOPS’ (‘Psychological Outcome Profiles’) Primary Care Mental Health. 2005;3(4):261–70. Ashworth M, Robinson S, Godfrey E, et al. Measuring mental health outcomes in primary care: the psychometric properties of a new patient-generated. outcome measure, ‘PSYCHLOPS’ (‘Psychological Outcome Profiles’) Primary Care Mental Health. 2005;3(4):261–70.
22.
go back to reference Yeung AS, Jing Y, Brenneman SK, et al. Clinical Outcomes in Measurement based Treatment (COMET): a trial of depression monitoring and feedback to primary care physicians. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(10):865–73.CrossRefPubMed Yeung AS, Jing Y, Brenneman SK, et al. Clinical Outcomes in Measurement based Treatment (COMET): a trial of depression monitoring and feedback to primary care physicians. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(10):865–73.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Chang TE, Jing Y, Yeung AS, et al. Effect of communicating depression severity on physician prescribing patterns: findings from the Clinical Outcomes in Measurement-based Treatment (COMET) trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012;34(2):105–12.CrossRefPubMed Chang TE, Jing Y, Yeung AS, et al. Effect of communicating depression severity on physician prescribing patterns: findings from the Clinical Outcomes in Measurement-based Treatment (COMET) trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012;34(2):105–12.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gilbody S, Richards D, Barkham M. Diagnosing depression in primary care using self-completed instruments: UK validation of PHQ–9 and CORE–OM. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:650–2.PubMedPubMedCentral Gilbody S, Richards D, Barkham M. Diagnosing depression in primary care using self-completed instruments: UK validation of PHQ–9 and CORE–OM. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:650–2.PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Grafe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord. 2004;81:61–6.CrossRefPubMed Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Grafe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord. 2004;81:61–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick R, Gibbons E, Mackintosh A. An overview of patient-reported outcome measures for people with anxiety and depression. Oxford: Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford; 2009. Fitzpatrick R, Gibbons E, Mackintosh A. An overview of patient-reported outcome measures for people with anxiety and depression. Oxford: Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford; 2009.
34.
go back to reference Robinson J, Khan N, Fusco L, et al. Why are there discrepancies between depressed patients’ global rating of change and scores on the patient health questionnaire depression module? A qualitative study of primary care in England. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e014519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robinson J, Khan N, Fusco L, et al. Why are there discrepancies between depressed patients’ global rating of change and scores on the patient health questionnaire depression module? A qualitative study of primary care in England. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e014519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
37.
go back to reference Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092–7.CrossRefPubMed Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461–4.CrossRefPubMed Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461–4.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, Brewin C, Wing J, editors. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 1992. p. 163–83. Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, Brewin C, Wing J, editors. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 1992. p. 163–83.
41.
go back to reference Meakin R, Weinman J. The ‘Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale’ (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice. Fam Pract. 2002;19(3):257–63.CrossRefPubMed Meakin R, Weinman J. The ‘Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale’ (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice. Fam Pract. 2002;19(3):257–63.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Vanheule S, Desmet M, Groenvynck H, Rosseel Y, Fontaine J. The factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: an evaluation. Assessment. 2008;15:177–87.CrossRefPubMed Vanheule S, Desmet M, Groenvynck H, Rosseel Y, Fontaine J. The factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: an evaluation. Assessment. 2008;15:177–87.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12:436–45.CrossRef Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12:436–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient-reported outcome measures for monitoring primary care patients with depression (PROMDEP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Tony Kendrick
Michael Moore
Geraldine Leydon
Beth Stuart
Adam W. A. Geraghty
Guiqing Yao
Glyn Lewis
Gareth Griffiths
Carl May
Rachel Dewar-Haggart
Samantha Williams
Shihua Zhu
Christopher Dowrick
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04344-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue