Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Intellectual Disability | Study protocol

Effectiveness of the serious game ‘You & I’ in changing mentalizing abilities of adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities: a parallel superiority randomized controlled trial

Authors: Suzanne Derks, Suze van Wijngaarden, Mirjam Wouda, Carlo Schuengel, Paula S. Sterkenburg

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Persons with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities generally show dysfunctions in mentalization and stress regulation, resulting in problematic social relationships and personal distress. Intervention programs may improve mentalizing abilities. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the serious game ‘You & I’ in changing mentalizing abilities and stress regulation in adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.

Methods

A two-arm, parallel, superiority randomized controlled trial will be used with 172 adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group to play the serious game ‘You & I’ or a waitlist control group. Participants will be assessed at baseline, post intervention (5 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (6–8 weeks after post intervention). They also will fill in questionnaires for personal factors, personal development, personal well-being, social validity, autism spectrum quotient (demographic variables), mentalizing abilities (primary outcome measure), and stress regulation (secondary outcome measure).

Discussion

The serious game ‘You & I’ aims to improve mentalizing abilities in adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities, which is expected to lead to improved regulation of stress in social relationships. The study’s unique feature is the use of a serious game to improve mentalizing abilities. If the intervention is effective, the serious game can be implemented on a broad scale in Dutch care organizations for people with intellectual disabilities as an effective preventive tool to improve mentalizing abilities.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register, NTR7418. Registered on 2 August 2018.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Fonagy P, Bateman AW. Progress in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:1–3.CrossRef
2.
Bateman AW, Fonagy P. Mentalization-based treatment of BPD. J Personal Disord. 2004;18:36–51.CrossRef
3.
Dekker-van der Sande F, Sterkenburg P. Mentalization can be learned. Doorn: Bartiméus; 2016.
4.
Feenstra D, Bales D. Mentalization-based treatment voor adolescenten. Kinder-Jeugdpsychoterapie. 2015;42:5–20.
5.
Bateman A, Campbell C, Luyten P, Fonagy P. A mentalization-based approach to common factors in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018;21:44–9.CrossRef
6.
Baglio G, Blasi V, Intra FS, Castelli I, Massaro D, Baglio F, et al. Social competence in children with borderline intellectual functioning: delayed development of theory of mind across all complexity levels. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1–10.
7.
Happé FGE. An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24:129–54.CrossRef
8.
Yirmiya N, Erel O, Shaked M, Solomonica-levi D. Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychol Bull. 1998;124:283–307.CrossRef
9.
Bigby C. Known well by no-one: trends in the informal social networks of middle-aged and older people with intellectual disability five years after moving to the community. J Intellect Develop Disabil. 2008;33:148–57.CrossRef
10.
McClure KS, Halpern J, Wolper PA, Donahue JJ. Emotion regulation and intellectual disability. J Dev Disabil. 2014;15:38–44.
11.
Van Nieuwenhuijzen M. Sociale informatieverwerking van kinderen met lichte verstandelijke beperkingen. Kind en Adolesc. 2007;28:97–103.CrossRef
12.
Janssen C, Schuengel C. Gehechtheid, stress, gedragsproblemen en psychopathologie bij mensen met een lichte verstandelijke beperking: aanzetten voor interventie. In: Didden R, editor. In perspectief. Gedragsproblemen, psychiatrische stoornissen en lichte verstandelijke beperking. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2006. p. 67–84.
13.
Choi-Kain LW, Gunderson JG. Mentalization: ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:1127–35.CrossRef
14.
Allen JG, Fonagy P, Bateman AW. Mentalizing in clinical practice. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2008.
15.
16.
17.
Bateman AW, Ryle A, Fonagy P, Kerr IB. Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: mentalization based therapy and cognitive analytic therapy compared. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19:51–62.CrossRef
18.
Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist E, Target M. Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Other Press; 2002.
19.
Verheugt-Pleiter JE, Schmeets MGJ, Zevalkink J. Mentaliseren in de kindertherapie. Koninklijke Van Gorcum: Assen; 2005.
20.
Midgley N, Ensink K, Lindqvist K, Malberg N, Muller N. Mentalization-based treatment for children: a time-limited approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2017.CrossRef
21.
Bateman AW, Fonagy P. Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2012.
22.
Nolte T, Bolling DZ, Hudac CM, Fonagy P, Mayes L, Pelphrey KA. Brain mechanisms underlying the impact of attachment-related stress on social cognition. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:1–12.CrossRef
23.
Fonagy P, Bateman A. The development of borderline personality disorder—a mentalizing model. J Personal Disord. 2008;22:4–21.CrossRef
24.
Fonagy P, Luyten P. A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol. 2009;21:1355–81.CrossRef
25.
Blakemore S-J, Frith U. The learning brain: lessons for education. Dev Sci. 2005;6:459–71.CrossRef
26.
Bateman A, Fonagy P. Randomized controlled trial of outpatient mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:1355–64.CrossRef
27.
Jørgensen CR, Freund C, Bøye R, Jordet H, Andersen D, Kjølbye M. Outcome of mentalization-based and supportive psychotherapy in patients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;127:305–17.CrossRef
28.
Allen JG, Fonagy P. Handbook of mentalization-based treatment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.CrossRef
29.
Bales D, van Beek N, Smits M, Willemsen S, Busschbach JJV, Verheul R, et al. Treatment outcome of 18-month, day hospital mentalization-based treatment (MBT) in patients with severe borderline personality disorder in the Netherlands. J Personal Disord. 2012;26:568–82.CrossRef
30.
Laurenssen EMP, Eeren HV, Kikkert MJ, Peen J, Westra D, Dekker JJM, et al. The burden of disease in patients eligible for mentalization-based treatment (MBT): quality of life and costs. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:1–9.CrossRef
31.
Alvarez J, Damien D. An introduction to serious game: definitions and concepts. In: Proceedings of the Serious Games & Simulation Workshop. Paris; 2011. p. 10–5.
32.
Connolly TM, Boyle EA, MacArthur E, Hainey T, Boyle JM. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput Educ. 2012;59:661–86.CrossRef
33.
Wouters P, Van der Spek ED, Van Oostendorp H. Current practices in serious game research: a review from a learning outcomes perspective. In: Connolly TM, Stansfield M, Boyle L, editors. Games-based learning advancements for multi-sensory human computer interfaces: techniques and effective practices. Hershey: IGI Global; 2009. p. 232–50.CrossRef
34.
Den Brok WLJE, Sterkenburg PS. Self-controlled technologies to support skill attainment in persons with an autism spectrum disorder and/or an intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:1–10.CrossRef
35.
Ypsilanti A, Vivas AB, Räisänen T, Viitala M, Ijäs T, Ropes D. Are serious video games something more than a game? A review on the effectiveness of serious games to facilitate intergenerational learning. Educ Inf Technol. 2014;19:515–29.CrossRef
36.
Sterkenburg PS, Vacaru VS. The effectiveness of a serious game to enhance empathy for care workers for people with disabilities: a parallel randomized controlled trial. Disabil Health J. 2018;11:576–82.CrossRef
37.
Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat Sel Doc Psychol. 1980;10:1–18.
38.
Fogarty GJ, Bramston P. Validation of the Lifestress Inventory for People with Mild Intellectual Handicap. Res Dev Disabil. 1997;18(6):435–56.
39.
Kreidler SM, Muller KE, Grunwald GK, Ringham BM, Coker-Dukowithz ZT, Sakhadeo UR, et al. GLIMMPSE: online power computation for linear models with and without a baseline covariate. J Stat Softw. 2013;54:380–92.CrossRef
40.
Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthop. 1982;52:664–78.CrossRef
41.
Cummins RA, Lau ALD. Personal Wellbeing Index—School Children (PWI-SC) (Cantonese). 3rd ed. Victoria; 2005.
42.
Cummins RA, Lau ALD. Personal Wellbeing Index: Pre-school. Burwood: Deakin University; 2005.
43.
Seys DM. Kwaliteit van zorg: zorg voor kwaliteit. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen; 1987.
44.
Janssen MJ, Riksen-Walraven JM, Van Dijk JPM. Enhancing the quality of interaction between deafblind children and their educators. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2002;14:87–109.CrossRef
45.
Jonker D, Sterkenburg PS, Van Rensburg E. Caregiver-mediated therapy for an adult with visual and intellectual impairment suffering from separation anxiety. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;47:1–13.CrossRef
46.
Allison C, Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S. Toward brief “red flags” for autism screening: the short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51:202–12.CrossRef
47.
Booth T, Murray AL, McKenzie K, Kuenssberg R, O’Donnell M, Burnett H. Brief report: An evaluation of the AQ-10 as a brief screening instrument for ASD in adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43:2997–3000.CrossRef
48.
Fonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-perkins A, Lee Y, Warren F, Howard S, et al. Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–28.CrossRef
49.
Langner O, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DHJ, Hawk ST, Van Knippenberg A. Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cogn Emot. 2010;24:1377–88.CrossRef
50.
De Corte K, Buysse A, Verhofstadt L, Roeyers H, Ponnet K, Davis MH. Measuring empathic tendencies: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psychol Belg. 2014;47:235–60.CrossRef
51.
Michie AM, Lindsay WR. A treatment component designed to enhance empathy in sex offenders with an intellectual disability. Br J Forensic Pract. 2012;14:40–8.CrossRef
52.
Abell F, Happé F, Frith U. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cogn Dev. 2000;15:1–16.CrossRef
53.
Bandura A. Guidelines for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-efficacy, beliefs of adolescents. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing; 2006. p. 307–37.
54.
De Freitas S, Oliver M. How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Comput Educ. 2006;46:249–64.CrossRef
55.
Woittiez I, Putman L, Eggink E, Ras M, Sterkenburg PS. Zorg Beter Begrepen. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau; 2014. p. 128.
56.
Mulhall P, Taggart L, Coates V, McAloon T, Hassiotis A. A systematic review of the methodological and practical challenges of undertaking randomised-controlled trials with cognitive disability populations. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:114–28.CrossRef
57.
Moonen XMH. (H)erkennen en waarderen: Over het (h)erkennen van de noden mensen met licht verstandelijke beperkingen en het bieden van passende ondersteuning. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam; 2017.
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of the serious game ‘You & I’ in changing mentalizing abilities of adults with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities: a parallel superiority randomized controlled trial
Authors
Suzanne Derks
Suze van Wijngaarden
Mirjam Wouda
Carlo Schuengel
Paula S. Sterkenburg
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3608-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Trials 1/2019 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Healthy lifestyle consultation based on traditional Chinese medicine versus routine patient education in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy: study protocol for a clinical randomised trial

Study protocol

Medial malleolus: Operative Or Non-operative (MOON) trial protocol - a prospective randomised controlled trial of operative versus non-operative management of associated medial malleolus fractures in unstable fractures of the ankle

Study protocol

The redox-dependent regulation of satellite cells following aseptic muscle trauma (SpEED): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Research

How context can impact clinical trials: a multi-country qualitative case study comparison of diagnostic biomarker test interventions

Study protocol

Evaluating the efficacy of Seattle-PAP for the respiratory support of premature neonates: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Do antibacterial skin sutures reduce surgical site infections after elective open abdominal surgery? - Study protocol of a prospective, randomized controlled single center trial