Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Study protocol

Evaluation of a blended-learning training concept to train oncology physicians to advise their patients about complementary and integrative medicine (KOKON-KTO): study protocol for a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized trial

Authors: Stefanie M. Helmer, Alizé A. Rogge, Felix Fischer, Daniel Pach, Markus Horneber, Stephanie Roll, Claudia M. Witt

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many cancer patients are interested in complementary and integrative medicine during and after regular cancer treatment. Given the high number of users it is important that physicians and patients engage in a dialog about useful complementary and integrative medicine therapies during cancer treatment.
In a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized evaluation study we will develop, implement and evaluate a training program for oncology physicians advising their patients on complementary and integrative medicine. The main objective of the study is to evaluate whether training physicians in a blended-learning approach (e-learning + skills-training workshop) in providing advice to their cancer patients on complementary and integrative medicine, in addition to handing out an information leaflet about reputable websites, has different effects on the outcomes of patients, physicians, and their interaction level, compared to only giving out the information leaflet.

Methods/design

Forty-eight oncology physicians will be included into a cluster-randomized trial to either participate or not in the blended-learning training. Physicians will then advise 10 cancer patients each, resulting in 480 patients participating in the trial. The blended learning consists of nine units of up to 45 min of e-learning and 18 units of up to 45 min of on-site skills-training workshop focusing. Outcomes will be measured on the physician, patient, and physician-patient-interaction level.

Discussion

A blended-learning program for oncology physicians to advise their cancer patients in a systematic way and a reasonable time frame on complementary and integrative medicine will be evaluated in depth in a large cluster-randomized trial.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00012704. Registered on 28 August 2017.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Molassiotis A, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(4):655–63.CrossRef
2.
Hammer MJ, et al. Self-management for adult patients with cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(2):E10–26.CrossRef
3.
Kessel KA, et al. Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) as part of the oncological treatment: survey about patients’ attitude towards CAM in a university-based oncology center in Germany. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165801.CrossRef
4.
Horneber M, et al. How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine? Integr Cancer Ther. 2012;11(3):187–203.CrossRef
5.
Oskay-Ozcelik G, et al. Breast cancer patients’ expectations in respect of the physician-patient relationship and treatment management results of a survey of 617 patients. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(3):479–84.CrossRef
6.
Evans M, et al. Decisions to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by male cancer patients: information-seeking roles and types of evidence used. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007;7:25.CrossRef
7.
Broom A, Tovey P. The role of the Internet in cancer patients’ engagement with complementary and alternative treatments. Health (London). 2008;12(2):139–55.CrossRef
8.
Holmes MM, Bishop FL, Calman L. “I just Googled and read everything”: exploring breast cancer survivors’ use of the Internet to find information on complementary medicine. Complement Ther Med. 2017;33:78–84.CrossRef
9.
Frenkel M, Cohen L. Effective communication about the use of complementary and integrative medicine in cancer care. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(1):12–8.CrossRef
10.
Tautz E, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in breast cancer patients and their experiences: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(17):3133–9.CrossRef
11.
Juraskova I, et al. Discussing complementary therapy use with early-stage breast cancer patients: exploring the communication gap. Integr Cancer Ther. 2010;9(2):168–76.CrossRef
12.
Vickers KA, Jolly KB, Greenfield SM. Herbal medicine: women’s views, knowledge and interaction with doctors: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006;6(1):40.CrossRef
13.
Arthur K, et al. Reasons to use and disclose use of complementary medicine use—An insight from cancer patients. Cancer Clin Oncol. 2013;2(2):81–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Robinson A, McGrail MR. Disclosure of CAM use to medical practitioners: a review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Complement Ther Med. 2004;12(2):90–8.CrossRef
15.
Winslow C, Shapiro H. Physicians want education about complementary and alternative medicine to enhance communication with their patients. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(10):1176–81.CrossRef
16.
Guethlin C, Holmberg C, Klein G. Oncologists’ experiences of discussing complementary and alternative treatment options with their cancer patients. A qualitative analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(9):3857–62.CrossRef
17.
Klein GE, Guethlin C. Information and training needs regarding complementary and alternative medicine: a cross-sectional study of cancer care providers in Germany. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018;17(2):380–7.
18.
Blödt S, et al. A consultation training program for physicians for communication about complementary medicine with breast cancer patients: a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized, mixed-method pilot study. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:843.CrossRef
19.
Kiessling C, et al. Development and validation of a computer-based situational judgement test to assess medical students’ communication skills in the field of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(11):1858–64.CrossRef
20.
Arraras JI, et al. EORTC QLQ-COMU26: a questionnaire for the assessment of communication between patients and professionals. Phase III of the module development in ten countries. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(5):1485–94.CrossRef
21.
Liekweg A, et al. Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(2):96–103.CrossRef
22.
Bennett C, et al. Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(1):130–3.CrossRef
23.
Casar D. Evaluation eines Arzt-Patien-Interaktions-Trainings im Krankenhaus anhand von Selbst- und Fremdbeoachtungen. In: Medizinische Fakultät. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; 2009.
24.
Neumann M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the “Consultation and Relational Empathy” (CARE) measure at the example of cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2008;58(1):5–15.CrossRef
25.
Software V. MAXQDA Analytics Pro. Berlin: VERBI; 2016.
26.
Mayring P. In: überarbeitete Auflage, editor. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse Grundlagen und Techniken. 9. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag; 2007.
27.
Flick U. Doing triangulation and mixed methods. The Sage qualitative research kit. Vol. 2nd. Los Angeles: Sage; 2018.
28.
Schofield P, et al. Effectively discussing complementary and alternative medicine in a conventional oncology setting. Communication recommendations for clinicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(2):143–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a blended-learning training concept to train oncology physicians to advise their patients about complementary and integrative medicine (KOKON-KTO): study protocol for a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized trial
Authors
Stefanie M. Helmer
Alizé A. Rogge
Felix Fischer
Daniel Pach
Markus Horneber
Stephanie Roll
Claudia M. Witt
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3193-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Trials 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research

Efficacy of Bimin decoction for patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: an open-label non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Effects of aerobic interval training on glucose tolerance in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: a randomized trial protocol

Study protocol

Evaluation of the efficacy of simplified nutritional instructions from physicians on dietary salt restriction for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus consuming excessive salt: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

High-flow nasal therapy versus noninvasive ventilation in COPD patients with mild-to-moderate hypercapnic acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial

Study protocol

POPPIE: protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial of continuity of midwifery care for women at increased risk of preterm birth

Study protocol

Growing Healthy Together: protocol for a randomized clinical trial using parent mentors for early childhood obesity intervention in a Latino community