Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative vaginal delivery (ANODE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Marian Knight, Linda Mottram, Shan Gray, Christopher Partlett, Ed Juszczak, the ANODE collaborative group

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is one of the most important causes of maternal death and severe morbidity worldwide. Studies conducted both in the UK and US have documented an additional risk associated with operative vaginal delivery. However, a Cochrane review, updated in 2017, identified only one small trial of prophylactic antibiotics following operative vaginal delivery, which included a total of 393 women. Given the small size of that trial, it recommended that further robust evidence is needed. Operative vaginal delivery rates vary worldwide, but typically 5–10% of women have operative vaginal births. A conservative estimated incidence of maternal infection following operative vaginal delivery is 4%, based on the one previous trial. There is, therefore, considerable scope for direct patient benefit from an effective preventive strategy.

Methods/Design

This protocol describes a multicentre, randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial aiming to recruit 3424 participants from over 20 hospital sites in the UK. Women who have undergone an operative vaginal delivery at 36+0 weeks or greater gestation with no indication for ongoing antibiotics in the postpartum period and no contra-indications to prophylactic co-amoxiclav, will be randomised to receive a single intravenous dose of co-amoxiclav or placebo.
The primary outcome will be confirmed or suspected maternal infection within 6 weeks of delivery, as defined by one of (a) a new prescription of antibiotics for presumed perineal wound-related infection, endometritis or uterine infection, urinary tract infection with systemic features or other systemic infection, (b) systemic infection confirmed with a culture or (c) endometritis as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outcome information will be collected by a single telephone interview and questionnaire, with clinical data collected from medical records or the hospital laboratory if necessary, at 6 weeks post-delivery.

Discussion

This randomised trial will investigate whether a prophylactic dose of antibiotic following operative vaginal delivery can reduce the incidence of infection and sepsis. If shown to be effective, this could lead to a change in recommended practice and the prevention of infection. Conversely, if there is no significant difference between the two arms, then this could contribute to a reduction in antibiotic use and improved antimicrobial stewardship.

Trial registration

ISRCTN11166984. Registered on 23 September 2015.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonet M, et al. Towards a consensus definition of maternal sepsis: results of a systematic review and expert consultation. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bonet M, et al. Towards a consensus definition of maternal sepsis: results of a systematic review and expert consultation. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Say L, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.CrossRefPubMed Say L, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Declercq E, et al. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):669–77.CrossRefPubMed Declercq E, et al. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):669–77.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD007482. Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD007482.
7.
go back to reference Acosta CD, et al. Maternal sepsis: a Scottish population-based case-control study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119(4):474–83.CrossRef Acosta CD, et al. Maternal sepsis: a Scottish population-based case-control study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119(4):474–83.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Acosta CD, et al. The continuum of maternal Sepsis severity: incidence and risk factors in a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e67175 Acosta CD, et al. The continuum of maternal Sepsis severity: incidence and risk factors in a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e67175
10.
go back to reference Liabsuetrakul T, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD004455.PubMed Liabsuetrakul T, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD004455.PubMed
11.
go back to reference World Health Organisation. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of maternal peripartum infections. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2015. World Health Organisation. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of maternal peripartum infections. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal wound infection: is there underreporting? Br J Nurs. 2012;21(5):S28. S30, S32-5CrossRefPubMed Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal wound infection: is there underreporting? Br J Nurs. 2012;21(5):S28. S30, S32-5CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Perkins E, et al. Women’s views of important outcomes following perineal repair. BJOG. 2008;115(Suppl 1):152. Perkins E, et al. Women’s views of important outcomes following perineal repair. BJOG. 2008;115(Suppl 1):152.
17.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top Guideline No. 64b. Bacterial Sepsis following pregnancy. London: RCOG; 2012. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top Guideline No. 64b. Bacterial Sepsis following pregnancy. London: RCOG; 2012.
19.
go back to reference Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1089–93. discussion 1093-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1089–93. discussion 1093-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference McCandlish R, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(12):1262–72.CrossRefPubMed McCandlish R, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(12):1262–72.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Dudley L, et al. Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e012766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dudley L, et al. Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e012766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
24.
go back to reference Laxminarayan R, et al. Access to effective antimicrobials: a worldwide challenge. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):168–75.CrossRefPubMed Laxminarayan R, et al. Access to effective antimicrobials: a worldwide challenge. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):168–75.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infection following operative vaginal delivery (ANODE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Marian Knight
Linda Mottram
Shan Gray
Christopher Partlett
Ed Juszczak
the ANODE collaborative group
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2787-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue