Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Samuel McClinton, Sarah Cameron, Kathryn Starr, Ruth Thomas, Graeme MacLennan, Alison McDonald, Thomas Lam, James N’Dow, Mary Kilonzo, Robert Pickard, Ken Anson, Frank Keeley, Neil Burgess, Charles Terry Clark, Sara MacLennan, John Norrie, for the TISU Study Group

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Urinary stone disease is very common with an estimated prevalence among the general population of 2–3%. Ureteric stones are associated with severe pain as they pass through the urinary tract and have significant impact on patients’ quality of life due to the detrimental effect on their ability to work and need for hospitalisation. Most ureteric stones can be expected to pass spontaneously with supportive care. However, between one-fifth and one-third of cases require an intervention.
The two standard active intervention options are extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopic stone retrieval. ESWL and ureteroscopy are effective in terms of stone clearance; however, they differ in terms of invasiveness, anaesthetic requirement, treatment setting, complications, patient-reported outcomes (e.g. pain after intervention, time off work) and cost. There is uncertainty around which is the most clinically effective in terms of stone clearance and the true cost to the NHS and to society (in terms of impact on patient-reported health and economic burden).
The aim of this trial is to determine whether, in adults with ureteric stones, judged to require active intervention, ESWL is not inferior and is more cost-effective compared to ureteroscopic treatment as the initial management option.

Methods

The TISU study is a pragmatic multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial of ESWL as the first treatment option compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment for ureteric stones.
Patients aged over 16 years with a ureteric stone confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography of the kidney, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) will be randomised to either ESWL or ureteroscopy. The primary clinical outcome is resolution of the stone episode (no further intervention required to facilitate stone clearance) up to six months from randomisation. The primary economic outcome is the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained at six months from randomisation.

Discussion

Determining whether ESWL is not inferior clinically and is cost-effective compared to ureteroscopic treatment as the initial management in adults with ureteric stones who are judged to require active treatment is relevant not only to patients and clinicians but also to healthcare providers, both in the UK and globally.

Trial registration

ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN92289221. Registered on 21 February 2013.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Menon M, Parulkar BG, Drach GW. Urinary lithiasis: etiology, diagnosis and medical management. In: Walsh PC, Retnik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell's Urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1998. p. 2659–2752. Menon M, Parulkar BG, Drach GW. Urinary lithiasis: etiology, diagnosis and medical management. In: Walsh PC, Retnik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell's Urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1998. p. 2659–2752.
2.
go back to reference Bihl G, Meyers A. Recurrent renal stone disease-advances in pathogenesis and clinical management. Lancet. 2001;358:651–6.CrossRefPubMed Bihl G, Meyers A. Recurrent renal stone disease-advances in pathogenesis and clinical management. Lancet. 2001;358:651–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wilkinson H. Clinical investigation and management of patients with renal stones. Ann Clin Biochem. 2001;38:3–7.CrossRef Wilkinson H. Clinical investigation and management of patients with renal stones. Ann Clin Biochem. 2001;38:3–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM Jr, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817–23.CrossRefPubMed Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM Jr, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1610–31.CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1610–31.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nabi G, Downey P, Keeley FX, Watson GM, McClinton S. Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD006029. Nabi G, Downey P, Keeley FX, Watson GM, McClinton S. Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD006029.
11.
go back to reference Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK population norms for EQ-5D. Discussion Paper 172. York: University of York: Centre for Health Economics; 1999. Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK population norms for EQ-5D. Discussion Paper 172. York: University of York: Centre for Health Economics; 1999.
12.
go back to reference Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe K, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: Designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147.CrossRefPubMed Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe K, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: Designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Brueton VC, Tierney J, Stenning S, Harding S, Meredith S, Nazareth I, et al. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:MR000032. Brueton VC, Tierney J, Stenning S, Harding S, Meredith S, Nazareth I, et al. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:MR000032.
Metadata
Title
TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Samuel McClinton
Sarah Cameron
Kathryn Starr
Ruth Thomas
Graeme MacLennan
Alison McDonald
Thomas Lam
James N’Dow
Mary Kilonzo
Robert Pickard
Ken Anson
Frank Keeley
Neil Burgess
Charles Terry Clark
Sara MacLennan
John Norrie
for the TISU Study Group
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2652-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue