Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol

Authors: Katie Gillies, Peter Bower, Jim Elliott, Graeme MacLennan, Rumana S. N. Newlands, Margaret Ogden, Shaun P. Treweek, Mary Wells, Miles D. Witham, Bridget Young, Jill J. Francis

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial results and significantly reduces the potential of a trial to influence clinical practice. Non-retention can be defined as instances where participants leave the study prematurely. Examples include withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up and thus outcome data cannot be obtained. The majority of existing interventions targeting retention fail to describe any theoretical basis for the observed improvement, or lack of improvement. Moreover, most of these interventions lack involvement of participants in their conception and/or design, raising questions about their relevance and acceptability. Many of the causes of non-retention involve people performing a behaviour (e.g. not returning a questionnaire). Behaviour change is difficult, and the importance of a strong theoretical basis for interventions that aim to change behaviour is increasingly recognised. This research aims to develop and pilot theoretically informed, participant-centred, evidence-based behaviour change interventions to improve retention in trials.

Methods

This research will generate data through semi-structured interviews on stakeholders’ perspectives of the reasons for trial non-retention. It will identify perceived barriers and enablers to trial retention using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The intervention development work will involve identification of behaviour change techniques, using recognised methodology, and co-production of retention interventions through discussion groups with end-users. An evaluation of intervention acceptability and feasibility will be conducted in focus groups. Finally, a ready-to-use evaluation framework to deploy in Studies Within A Trial as well as an explanatory retention framework will be developed for identifying and tackling modifiable issues to improve trial retention.

Discussion

We believe this to be one of the first studies to apply a theoretical lens to the development of interventions to improve trial retention that have been informed by, and are embedded within, participants’ experiential accounts. By developing and identifying priority interventions this study will support efforts to reduce research waste.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pocock S. Clinical trials: a practical approach. London: Wiley; 1984. Pocock S. Clinical trials: a practical approach. London: Wiley; 1984.
2.
go back to reference Walsh M, Sackett D, Deveraux PJ. When RCT participants are lost to follow up. Why even a few can matter. Clin Trials. 2015;12:537–9.CrossRefPubMed Walsh M, Sackett D, Deveraux PJ. When RCT participants are lost to follow up. Why even a few can matter. Clin Trials. 2015;12:537–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF, Mrkobrada M, Levine O, Ribic C, Molnar AO, Dattani ND, Burke A, Guyatt G, Thabane L, Walter SD, Pogue J, Devereaux PJ. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):622–8.CrossRefPubMed Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF, Mrkobrada M, Levine O, Ribic C, Molnar AO, Dattani ND, Burke A, Guyatt G, Thabane L, Walter SD, Pogue J, Devereaux PJ. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):622–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference NIHR CRN Annual Performance Report 2014/2015. NIHR CRN Annual Performance Report 2014/2015.
7.
go back to reference Tudur Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tudur Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010;29(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010;29(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Duncan A, Bonetti D, Clarkson J, Ramsay C. Improving trial questionnaire response rates using behaviour change theory. Trials. 2015;16 Suppl 2:92.CrossRef Duncan A, Bonetti D, Clarkson J, Ramsay C. Improving trial questionnaire response rates using behaviour change theory. Trials. 2015;16 Suppl 2:92.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, Foy R, Duncan EM, Colquhoun H, Grimshaw J, Lawton R, Michie S. A Guide to qualitative approaches using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, Foy R, Duncan EM, Colquhoun H, Grimshaw J, Lawton R, Michie S. A Guide to qualitative approaches using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. Accessed 21 Mar 2018. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12160-013-9486-6. Accessed 21 Mar 2018.
15.
go back to reference Michie S, Wood CE, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis JJ, Hardeman W. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(99):1–188.CrossRef Michie S, Wood CE, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis JJ, Hardeman W. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(99):1–188.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Fitzpatrick R, Knapp M, Barlow J, Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Bardsley M, Newman SP. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Fitzpatrick R, Knapp M, Barlow J, Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Bardsley M, Newman SP. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Eborall HC, Stewart MC, Cunningham-Burley S, Price JF, Fowkes FG. Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study. Trials. 2011;12:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eborall HC, Stewart MC, Cunningham-Burley S, Price JF, Fowkes FG. Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study. Trials. 2011;12:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J. Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial—a qualitative study of the patient’s perspective. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(2):226.CrossRefPubMed Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J. Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial—a qualitative study of the patient’s perspective. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(2):226.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Shilling V, Williamson PR, Hickey H, Sowden E, Smyth RL, Young B. Processes in recruitment to randomised controlled trials of medicines for children (RECRUIT): a qualitative study. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(15):1–116. Shilling V, Williamson PR, Hickey H, Sowden E, Smyth RL, Young B. Processes in recruitment to randomised controlled trials of medicines for children (RECRUIT): a qualitative study. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(15):1–116.
21.
go back to reference Locock L, Smith L. Personal experiences of taking part in clinical trials—a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(3):303.CrossRefPubMed Locock L, Smith L. Personal experiences of taking part in clinical trials—a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(3):303.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):274–91.CrossRefPubMed Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):274–91.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Corbin JM, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008.CrossRef Corbin JM, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res. 1999;27:258–84.CrossRef Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res. 1999;27:258–84.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Orwin RG. Evaluating coding decisions. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994. p. 177–200. Orwin RG. Evaluating coding decisions. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994. p. 177–200.
26.
go back to reference Francis JJ, Duncan EM, Prior ME, MacLennan G, Marshall AP, Wells EC, Todd L, Rose L, Campbell MK, Webster F, Eccles MP, Bellingan G, Seppelt IM, Grimshaw JM, Cuthbertson BH. Comparison of four methods for assessing the importance of attitudinal beliefs: an international Delphi study in intensive care settings. Brit J Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):274–91.CrossRef Francis JJ, Duncan EM, Prior ME, MacLennan G, Marshall AP, Wells EC, Todd L, Rose L, Campbell MK, Webster F, Eccles MP, Bellingan G, Seppelt IM, Grimshaw JM, Cuthbertson BH. Comparison of four methods for assessing the importance of attitudinal beliefs: an international Delphi study in intensive care settings. Brit J Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):274–91.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Michie S, Johnston M, Francis JJ, Hardeman W, Eccles MP. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:660–80.CrossRef Michie S, Johnston M, Francis JJ, Hardeman W, Eccles MP. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:660–80.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The APEASE criteria for designing and evaluating interventions. In: The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014. Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The APEASE criteria for designing and evaluating interventions. In: The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
29.
go back to reference Smith V, Clarke M, Devane D, Begley C, Shorter G, Maguire L. SWAT 1: what effects do site visits by the principal investigator have on recruitment in a multicentre randomized trial? J Evid Based Med. 2013;6(3):136.CrossRefPubMed Smith V, Clarke M, Devane D, Begley C, Shorter G, Maguire L. SWAT 1: what effects do site visits by the principal investigator have on recruitment in a multicentre randomized trial? J Evid Based Med. 2013;6(3):136.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, Howells DW, Ioannidis JP, Oliver S. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156.CrossRefPubMed Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, Howells DW, Ioannidis JP, Oliver S. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
33.
go back to reference Madurasinghe V, Sandra Eldridge on behalf of MRC START Group and Gordon Forbes on behalf of the START Expert Consensus Group. Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials. Trials. 2016;17:27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Madurasinghe V, Sandra Eldridge on behalf of MRC START Group and Gordon Forbes on behalf of the START Expert Consensus Group. Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials. Trials. 2016;17:27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol
Authors
Katie Gillies
Peter Bower
Jim Elliott
Graeme MacLennan
Rumana S. N. Newlands
Margaret Ogden
Shaun P. Treweek
Mary Wells
Miles D. Witham
Bridget Young
Jill J. Francis
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Trials 1/2018 Go to the issue