Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Development of a core outcome set for studies involving patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease: study protocol for a systematic review and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey

Authors: Graeme K. Ambler, David C. Bosanquet, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Emma Thomas-Jones, Cherry-Ann Waldron, Adrian G. K. Edwards, Christopher P. Twine

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The development of a standardised reporting set is important to ensure that research is directed towards the most important outcomes and that data is comparable. To ensure validity, the set must be agreed by a consensus of stakeholders including patients, healthcare professionals and lay representatives. There is currently no agreed core outcome set for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) for either short- or medium-term research outcomes. By developing these sets we aim to rationalise future trial outcomes, facilitate meta-analysis and improve the quality and applicability of amputation research.

Methods/design

We will undertake a comprehensive systematic review of studies of patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for PAD. Data regarding all primary and secondary outcomes reported in relevant studies will be extracted and summarised as outcome domains. We will then undertake focus groups with key stakeholders (patients, carers, health and social care workers) to collect qualitative data to identify the main short- and medium-term research outcomes for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation. Results of the systematic review and focus groups will be combined to create a comprehensive list of potential key outcomes. Stakeholders (patients, researchers and health and social care workers) will then be polled to determine which of the outcomes are considered to be important in a general context using a three-phase Delphi process. After preliminary analysis, results will be presented at a face-to-face meeting of key stakeholders for discussion and voting on the final set of core outcomes. This project is being run in parallel with a feasibility trial assessing perineural catheters in patients undergoing lower limb amputation (the PLACEMENT trial). Full ethical approval has been granted for the study (Wales REC 3 reference number 16/WA/0353).

Discussion

Core outcome sets will be developed for short- and medium-term outcomes of research involving patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for PAD. This will help with the design of future trials and facilitate meta-analyses of trial data.

Trial registration

PROSPERO: CRD42017059329. Registered on 30 March 2017.

COMET: 975. Registered on 5 April 2017.

Literature
  1. Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:1329–40.View ArticlePubMed
  2. NCEPOD. Lower limb amputation: working together. 2014. http://​www.​ncepod.​org.​uk/​2014lla.​html. Accessed 11 July 2017.
  3. Waton S, Johal A, Heikkela K, Cromwell D, Loftus I. National Vascular Registry annual report. 2016. https://​www.​vsqip.​org.​uk/​reports/​2016-annual-report/​. Accessed 11 July 2017.
  4. Tovey D. The impact of Cochrane Reviews. 2010. http://​www.​cochranelibrary.​com/​editorial/​10.​1002/​14651858.​ED000007. Accessed 11 July 2017.
  5. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, Williamson PR. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​c365.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  7. Radhakrishnan S, Kohler F, Gutenbrunner C, Jayaraman A, Li J, Pieber K, Schiappacasse C. The use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to classify the factors influencing mobility reported by persons with an amputation: an international study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
  8. Bosanquet DC, Ambler GK, Waldron C, Brookes-Howell L, Thomas-Jones RE, Kelson M, Fitzsimmons D, Harris D, Saxena N, Twine CP. Perineural Local Anaesthetic Catheter aftEr Major lowEr limb amputatioN Trial (PLACEMENT); study protocol for a pilot study. 2017. Submitted to Trials.
  9. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, et al. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18 Suppl 3:280.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  10. Cresswell J, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.
  11. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, for the PRISMA Group, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  12. Carlsen B, Glenton C. What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  13. O’Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2012;13:190–7.View Article
  14. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.View Article
  15. Tavallaei M, Abu TM. A general perspective on role of theory in qualitative research. J Int Social Res. 2010;3(11):570–7.
  16. Vanmanen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The University of Western Ontario; 1990.
  17. Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, Wales PW. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–9.View ArticlePubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a core outcome set for studies involving patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease: study protocol for a systematic review and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
Authors
Graeme K. Ambler
David C. Bosanquet
Lucy Brookes-Howell
Emma Thomas-Jones
Cherry-Ann Waldron
Adrian G. K. Edwards
Christopher P. Twine
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2358-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Effectiveness of robot-assisted training added to conventional rehabilitation in patients with humeral fracture early after surgical treatment: protocol of a randomised, controlled, multicentre trial

Research

The feasibility of the Prostate cancer: Evidence of Exercise and Nutrition Trial (PrEvENT) dietary and physical activity modifications: a qualitative study

Research

Quality of intervention delivery in a cluster randomised controlled trial: a qualitative observational study with lessons for fidelity

Study protocol

Magnetic resonance imaging for cerebral lesions during minimal invasive mitral valve surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Effect of Daikenchuto (TJ-100) on gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Research

A lifestyle intervention among elderly men on active surveillance for non-aggressive prostate cancer: a randomised feasibility study with whole-grain rye and exercise