Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

An intervention delivered by text message to increase the acceptability of effective contraception among young women in Palestine: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Ona L McCarthy, Ola Wazwaz, Iman Jado, Baptiste Leurent, Phil Edwards, Samia Adada, Amina Stavridis, Caroline Free

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Unintended pregnancy can negatively impact women’s lives and is associated with poorer health outcomes for women and children. Many women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, continue to face obstacles in avoiding unintended pregnancy. In the State of Palestine, a survey conducted in 2006 estimated that 38% of pregnancies are unintended. In 2014, unmet need for contraception was highest among young women aged 20–24 years, at 15%.
Mobile phones are increasingly being used to deliver health support. Once developed, interventions delivered by mobile phone are often cheaper to deliver than face-to-face support. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association have partnered to develop and evaluate a contraceptive behavioural intervention for young women in Palestine delivered by mobile phone. The intervention was developed guided by behavioural science and consists of short, mobile phone text messages that contain information about contraception and behaviour change methods delivered over 4 months.

Methods

We will evaluate the intervention by conducting a randomised controlled trial. Five hundred and seventy women aged 18–24 years, who do not report using an effective method of contraception, will be allocated with a 1:1 ratio to receive the intervention text messages or control text messages about trial participation. The primary outcome is self-reported acceptability of at least one method of effective contraception at 4 months. Secondary outcomes include the use of effective contraception, acceptability of individual methods, discontinuation, service uptake, unintended pregnancy and abortion. Process outcomes include knowledge, perceived norms, personal agency and intervention dose received. Outcomes at 4 months will be compared between arms using logistic regression.

Discussion

This trial will determine the effect of the intervention on young women’s attitudes towards the most effective methods of contraception. If the intervention is found to be effective, the intervention will be implemented widely across Palestine. The results could also be used to design a larger trial to establish its effect on unintended pregnancy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02905461. Registered on 14 September 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Khajehpour M, Simbar M, Jannesari S, Ramezani-Tehrani F, Majd HA. Health status of women with intended and unintended pregnancies. Public Health. 2013;127(1):58–64.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2008;39(1):18–38.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Najman JM, Morrison J, Williams G, Andersen M, Keeping JD. The mental health of women 6 months after they give birth to an unwanted baby: a longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(3):241–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Barber JS, Axinn WG, Thornton A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40(3):231–57.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Nakku JEM, Nakasi G, Mirembe F. Postpartum major depression at six weeks in primary health care: prevalence and associated factors. Afr Health Sci. 2006;6(4):207–14.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Lau Y, Keung DWF. Correlates of depressive symptomatology during the second trimester of pregnancy among Hong Kong Chinese. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(9):1802–11.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Orr ST, Miller CA. Unintended pregnancy and the psychosocial well-being of pregnant women. Womens Health Issues. 1997;7(1):38–46.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Cheng D, Schwarz EB, Douglas E, Horon I. Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Contraception. 2009;79(3):194–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Eggleston E. Unintended pregnancy and women’ use of prenatal care in Ecuador. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(7):1011–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Marston C, Cleland J. Do unintended pregnancies carried to term lead to adverse outcomes for mother and child? An assessment in five developing countries. Popul Stud. 2003;57(1):77–93.CrossRef
13.
Kost K, Landry DJ, Darroch JE. Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter? Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30(2):79–88.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Magadi MA, Madise NJ, Rodrigues RN. Frequency and timing of antenatal care in Kenya: explaining the variations between women of different communities. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(4):551–61.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Shah PS, Balkhair T, Ohlsson A, Beyene J, Scott F, Frick C. Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(2):205–16.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Mohllajee AP, Curtis KM, Morrow B, Marchbanks PA. Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):678–86.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Carson C, Redshaw M, Sacker A, Kelly Y, Kurinczuk JJ, Quigley MA. Effects of pregnancy planning, fertility, and assisted reproductive treatment on child behavioral problems at 5 and 7 years: evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):456–63.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Brown SS, Eisenberg L. The best intentions: unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 1995.
19.
Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Ahman E, Shah IH. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1338–45.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Abortion U. Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
21.
Singh S, Darroch J, Ashford L. Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health 2014. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2014.
22.
Sedgh G, Ashford L, Hussain R. Unmet need for contraception in developing countries: examining women’s reasons for not using a method. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016.
23.
Giacaman R, Rabaia Y, Nguyen-Gillham V, Batniji R, Punamaki R-L, Summerfield D. Mental health, social distress and political oppression: the case of the occupied Palestinian territory. Glob Public Health. 2011;6(5):547–59.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Giacaman R, Mataria A, Nguyen-Gillham V, Safieh RA, Stefanini A, Chatterji S. Quality of life in the Palestinian context: an inquiry in war-like conditions. Health Policy. 2007;81(1):68–84.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Giacaman R, Abu-Rmeileh NME, Husseini A, Saab H, Boyce W. Humiliation: the invisible trauma of war for Palestinian youth. Public Health. 2007;121(8):563–71. discussion 72–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Bosmans M, Nasser D, Khammash U, Claeys P, Temmerman M. Palestinian women’s sexual and reproductive health rights in a longstanding humanitarian crisis. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(31):103–11.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Giacaman R, Abu-Rmeileh NME, Mataria A, Wick L. Palestinian women’s pregnancy intentions: analysis and critique of the Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Health Policy. 2008;85(1):83–93.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Roudi-Fahimi F, Abdul Monem A. Unintended pregnancies in the Middle East and North Africa. In: Population Reference Bureau, editor; 2010.
29.
Cleland J, Ali MM. Reproductive consequences of contraceptive failure in 19 developing countries. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(2):314–20.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher R, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Kowal D, Policar M, editors. Contraceptive technology: twentieth revised edition. 20th ed. New York: Ardent Media; 2011.
31.
32.
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. Palestinian Family Health Survey 2006: Final Report. Ramallah, Palestine; 2007.
33.
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. Palestinian Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2014: Final Report. Ramallah, Palestine; 2015.
34.
Imam A, Khatib S, Al-Hajar B, Qaraqra D, Al-Halaweh H, Salim M. Unmet needs for modern family planning in state of Palestine. Jerusalem, Palestine: School of Public Health/Al-Quds University; 2013.
35.
Memmi S. Contraceptive behaviour as a marital responsibility in the occupied Palestinian territory: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2013;382:S26.CrossRef
36.
Roudi-Fahimi F, Abdul Monem A, Ashford L, El Adawy M. Women’s need for family planning in Arab countries. In: Population Reference Bureau, editor; 2012.
37.
Sayej S. Baseline survey on safe/unsafe abortion in selected refugee camps in West Bank Jerusalem: Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association. 2007.
38.
AlRifai A. Safe and unsafe abortion among Palestinian women in Hebron Governorate in Southern West Bank-Palestine. Jerusalem: Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association and the Safe Abortion Action Fund; 2015.
39.
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. Final Report of the Palestinian Family Survey 2010. Ramallah, Palestine; 2013.
40.
Hammoudeh W. Addressing family planning delivery gaps in the Palestinian Territory. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau; 2014.
41.
Sayej S, Kokian V. Increasing access of the underserved areas in Palestine To SRH Services. 2014.
42.
Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, Whittaker R, Edwards P, Zhou W, et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):49–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, Kariri A, Karanja S, Chung MH, et al. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9755):1838–45.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Pop-Eleches C, Thirumurthy H, Habyarimana JP, Zivin JG, Goldstein MP, de Walque D, et al. Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS. 2011;25(6):825–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Zurovac D, Sudoi RK, Akhwale WS, Ndiritu M, Hamer DH, Rowe AK, et al. The effect of mobile phone text-message reminders on Kenyan health workers’ adherence to malaria treatment guidelines: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):795–803.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Orr JA, King RJ. Mobile phone SMS messages can enhance healthy behaviour: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(4):397–416.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Hall CS, Fottrell E, Wilkinson S, Byass P. Assessing the impact of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income countries—what has been shown to work? Glob Health Action. 2014;7:25606.CrossRef
48.
Aranda-Jan CB, Mohutsiwa-Dibe N, Loukanova S. Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Head KJ, Noar SM, Iannarino NT, Grant Harrington N. Efficacy of text messaging-based interventions for health promotion: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2013;97:41–8.CrossRefPubMed
51.
52.
L’Engle KL, Mangone ER, Parcesepe AM, Agarwal S, Ippoliti NB. Mobile phone interventions for adolescent sexual and reproductive health: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3):e20160884.
53.
Berenson AB, Rahman M. A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms. Contraception. 2012;86(6):716–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Castaño PM, Bynum JY, Andres R, Lara M, Westhoff C. Effect of daily text messages on oral contraceptive continuation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(1):14–20.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Trent M, Thompson C, Tomaszewski K. Text messaging support for urban adolescents and young adults using injectable contraception: outcomes of the DepoText Pilot Trial. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(1):100–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Hall KS, Westhoff CL, Castano PM. The impact of an educational text message intervention on young urban women’s knowledge of oral contraception. Contraception. 2013;87(4):449–54.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Smith C, Gold J, Ngo TD, Sumpter C, Free C. Mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015.
58.
Smith C, Ngo TD, Gold J, Edwards P, Vannak U, Sokhey L, et al. Effect of a mobile phone-based intervention on post-abortion contraception: a randomized controlled trial in Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ. 2015.
59.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council.
60.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–92.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Bartholomew Eldredge LK, Markham C, Ruiter R, Fernandez M, Kok G, Parcel G. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2016.
63.
Poushter J. Smartphone ownership and Internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2016.
64.
65.
66.
Montaño D, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behaviour: theory, research and practice. 5th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2015. p. 168–222.
67.
Kok G, Gottlieb N, Peters G, Mullen P, Parcel G, Ruiter R, et al. A taxonomy of behavior change methods; an intervention mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2015.
68.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2017. p. 2017.
69.
O’Kelly M, Ratitch B. Clinical trials with missing data: a guide for practitioners. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2014.
70.
European Medicines Agency. Guideline on Missing Data in Confirmatory Clinical Trials. London, UK; 2011.
71.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C, Altman DG, Barbour V, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on adjustment for baseline covariates in clinical trials. London, UK. 2015.
73.
Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med. 2002;21(19):2917–30.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Kasenda B, Schandelmaier S, Sun X, von Elm E, You J, Blumle A, et al. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications. BMJ. 2014;349:g4539.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Gabler NB, Duan N, Liao D, Elmore JG, Ganiats TG, Kravitz RL. Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge? Trials. 2009;10:43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
76.
Kent DM, Rothwell PM, Ioannidis JPA, Altman DG, Hayward RA. Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal. Trials. 2010;11:85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(3):229–36.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
An intervention delivered by text message to increase the acceptability of effective contraception among young women in Palestine: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Ona L McCarthy
Ola Wazwaz
Iman Jado
Baptiste Leurent
Phil Edwards
Samia Adada
Amina Stavridis
Caroline Free
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2191-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue

Study protocol

A mobile technology intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in 2- to 4-year-old children (Mini Movers): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of lower limb intermittent claudication: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the SHOCKWAVE 1 trial)

Study protocol

The efficacy of varenicline in achieving abstinence among waterpipe tobacco smokers – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Use of activity tracking in major visceral surgery—the Enhanced Perioperative Mobilization (EPM) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

The effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Gait Training versus conventional therapy on mobility in severely disabled progressIve MultiplE sclerosis patients (RAGTIME): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial