Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Family Integrated Care (FICare) in Level II Neonatal Intensive Care Units: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Authors: Karen M. Benzies, Vibhuti Shah, Khalid Aziz, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Luz Palacio-Derflingher, Jeanne Scotland, Jill Larocque, Kelly Mrklas, Esther Suter, Christopher Naugler, Henry T. Stelfox, Radha Chari, Abhay Lodha, Alberta FICare Level II NICU Study Team

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Every year, about 15 million of the world’s infants are born preterm (before 37 weeks gestation). In Alberta, the preterm birth rate was 8.7% in 2015, the second highest among Canadian provinces. Approximately 20% of preterm infants are born before 32 weeks gestation (early preterm), and require care in a Level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU); 80% are born moderate (32 weeks and zero days [320/7] to 336/7 weeks) and late preterm (340/7 to 366/7 weeks), and require care in a Level II NICU. Preterm birth and experiences in the NICU disrupt early parent-infant relationships and induce parental psychosocial distress. Family Integrated Care (FICare) shows promise as a model of care in Level III NICUs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate length of stay, infant and maternal clinical outcomes, and costs following adaptation and implementation of FICare in Level II NICUs.

Methods

We will conduct a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) in ten Alberta Level II NICUs allocated to one of two groups: FICare or standard care. The FICare Alberta model involves three theoretically-based, standardized components: information sharing, parenting education, and family support. Our sample size of 181 mother-infant dyads per group is based on the primary outcome of NICU length of stay, 80% participation, and 80% retention at follow-up. Secondary outcomes (e.g., infant clinical outcomes and maternal psychosocial distress) will be assessed shortly after admission to NICU, at discharge and 2 months corrected age. We will conduct economic analysis from two perspectives: the public healthcare payer and society. To understand the utility, acceptability, and impact of FICare, qualitative interviews will be conducted with a subset of mothers at the 2-month follow-up, and with hospital administrators and healthcare providers near the end of the study.

Discussion

Results of this pragmatic cRCT of FICare in Alberta Level II NICUs will inform policy decisions by providing evidence about the clinical effectiveness and costs of FICare.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02879799. Registered on 27 May 2016. Protocol version: 9 June 2016; version 2.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Discharge Abstract Database/Hospital Morbidity Database: childbirth indicators by place of residence. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2016.
3.
Newburn-Cook CV, Onyskiw JE. Is older maternal age a risk factor for preterm birth and fetal growth restriction? A systematic review. Health Care Women Int. 2005;26(9):852–75.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R. The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1410–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Tough S, Tofflemire K, Newburn-Cook C, Fraser-Lee N, Benzies K. Increased risks of pregnancy complications and adverse infant outcomes associated with assisted reproduction. Int Congr Ser. 2004;1271:376–9.CrossRef
6.
McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, Weiss G, Goldsmith LT. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(6):1514–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Engle WA, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Age terminology during the perinatal period. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):1362–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):587–97.CrossRef
9.
Engle WA, Tomashek KM, Wallman C, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. “Late-preterm” infants: a population at risk. Pediatrics. 2007;120:1390–401.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Alberta Perinatal Health Program. Annual Provincial Perinatal Report. Edmonton: Alberta Health Services; 2013.
11.
The Consortium on Safe Labor. Respiratory morbidity in late preterm births. JAMA. 2010;304(4):419–25.CrossRef
12.
Marrocchella S, Sestilli V, Indraccolo U, de Rosario F, Castellana L, Mastricci AL, Magaldi R, Del Bianco A, Greco P, Matteo M. Late preterm births: a retrospective analysis of the morbidity risk stratified for gestational age. SpringerPlus. 2014;3:114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Sahni R, Polin RA. Physiologic underpinnings for clinical problems in moderately preterm and late preterm infants. Clin Perinatol. 2013;40(4):645–63.CrossRefPubMed
14.
de Jong M, Verhoeven M, van Baar AL. School outcome, cognitive functioning, and behaviour problems in moderate and late preterm children and adults: A review. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17(3):163–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Johnson S, Evans TA, Draper ES, Field DJ, Manktelow BN, Marlow N, Matthews R, Petrou S, Seaton SE, Smith LK. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following late and moderate prematurity: a population-based cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(4):F301–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Kerstjens JM, de Winter AF, Bocca-Tjeertes IF, ten Vergert EM, Reijneveld SA, Bos AF. Developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children at school entry. J Pediatr. 2011;159(1):92–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
O’Connor AR, Wilson CM, Fielder AR. Ophthalmological problems associated with preterm birth. Eye. 2007;21(10):1254–60.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, Newton CRJC. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):445–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
de Jong M, Verhoeven M, Lasham CA, Meijssen CB, van Baar AL. Behaviour and development in 24-month-old moderately preterm toddlers. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(6):548–53.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Hornman J, de Winter AF, Kerstjens JM, Bos AF, Reijneveld SA. Emotional and behavioral problems of preterm and full-term children at school entry. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5):e20152255.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Potijk MR, de Winter AF, Bos AF, Kerstjens JM, Reijneveld SA. Higher rates of behavioural and emotional problems at preschool age in children born moderately preterm. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(2):112–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kerstjens JM, De Winter AF, Bocca-Tjeertes IF, Bos AF, Reijneveld SA. Risk of developmental delay increases exponentially as gestational age of preterm infants decreases: a cohort study at age 4 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(12):1096–101.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Schonhaut L, Armijo I, Pérez M. Gestational age and developmental risk in moderately and late preterm and early term infants. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):e835–41.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Petrou S, Eddama O, Mangham L. A structured review of the recent literature on the economic consequences of preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(3):F225–32.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Mangham LJ, Petrou S, Doyle LW, Draper ES, Marlow N. The cost of preterm birth throughout childhood in England and Wales. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):e312–27.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Dean S. Child Health Strategic Clinical Network meeting: reporting and analytics. Calgary: Alberta Health Services; 2012.
27.
Phibbs CS, Schmitt SK. Estimates of the cost and length of stay changes that can be attributed to one-week increases in gestational age for premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82(2):85–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
29.
Petrou S, Khan K. Economic costs associated with moderate and late preterm birth: primary and secondary evidence. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17(3):170–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Benzies KM, Magill-Evans J, Hayden A, Ballantyne M. Key components of early intervention programs for preterm infants and their parents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Staub K, Baardsnes J, Hébert N, Hébert M, Newell S, Pearce R. Our child is not just a gestational age. A first‐hand account of what parents want and need to know before premature birth. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(10):1035–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Lasiuk GC, Comeau T, Newburn-Cook C. Unexpected: an interpretive description of parental traumas’ associated with preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S13.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
McDonald SW, Benzies KM, Gallant JE, McNeil DA, Dolan SM, Tough SC. A comparison between late preterm and term infants on breastfeeding and maternal mental health. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1468–77.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Korja R, Latva R, Lehtonen L. The effects of preterm birth on mother-infant interaction and attachment during the infant’s first two years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(2):164–73.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Britto PR, Lye SJ, Proulx K, Yousafzai AK, Matthews SG, Vaivada T, Perez-Escamilla R, Rao N, Ip P, Fernald LC, et al. Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):91–102.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. From best practices to breakthrough impacts: a science-based approach to building a more promising future for young children and families. Cambridge: Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University; 2016.
37.
Renfrew MJ, Craig D, Dyson L, McCormick F, Rice S, King SE, Misso K, Stenhouse E, Williams AF. Breastfeeding promotion for infants in neonatal units: a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(40):1–146.CrossRefPubMed
38.
O’Brien K, Bracht M, Macdonell K, McBride T, Robson K, O’Leary L, Christie K, Galarza M, Dicky T, Levin A, et al. A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1:S12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Bracht M, O’Leary L, Lee SK, O’Brien K. Implementing family-integrated care in the NICU: a parent education and support program. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013;13(2):115–26.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Galarza-Winton ME, Dicky T, O’Leary L, Lee SK, O’Brien K. Implementing family-integrated care in the NICU: educating nurses. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013;13(5):335–40.CrossRefPubMed
41.
O’Brien K, Bracht M, Robson K, Xiang YY, Mirea L, Cruz M, Ng E, Monterrosa L, Soraisham A, Alvaro R. Evaluation of the Family Integrated Care model of neonatal intensive care: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Canada and Australia. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15(1):210.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Hei M, Gao X, Gao X, Nong S, Zhang A, Zhang Q, Lee SK. Is family integrated care in neonatal intensive care units feasible and good for preterm infants in China: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
44.
Donner A, Klar N. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. London: Arnold; 2000.
45.
Government of Alberta. Demographic spotlight: fertility in Alberta. Edmonton: Government of Alberta; 2011.
46.
Macdonell K, Christie K, Robson K, Pytlik K, Lee SK, O’Brien K. Implementing family-integrated care in the NICU: engaging veteran parents in program design and delivery. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013;13(4):262–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Garner AS, Shonkoff JP, Committee on Psychological Aspects of Child and Family Health, Committee on Early Childhood Adoption and Dependent Care, Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 1. Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: translating developmental science into lifelong health. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e224–31.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Benzies KM. Relational communications strategies to support family-centered neonatal intensive care. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016;30(3):233–6.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Knowles M. The adult learner: a neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company; 1973.
50.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory, Res Pract. 1982;19(3):276–88.CrossRef
51.
Sedgwick P. Log transformation of data. Br Med J. 2012;345:e6727.
52.
Rourke L, Leduc D, Rourke J. Rourke Baby Record: evidence-based infant/child health maintenance. 2014.
53.
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Government of Alberta. 2015 Alberta Wage and Salary Survey. Edmonton: Government of Alberta; 2015.
55.
Health A. Schedule of Medical Benefits—Health professional fees. Edmonton: Government of Alberta; 2014.
56.
Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2013.
57.
Briggs A, Gray A. The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998;3(4):233–45.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Barber J, Tompson S. Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalized linear models. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9(4):197–204.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Briggs A, Nixon R, Dixon S, Thompson S. Parametric modelling of cost data: some simulation evidence. Health Econ. 2005;14(4):421–8.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Hoch JS, Briggs AH, Willan AR. Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost‐effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 2002;11(5):415–30.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Miles MS, Funk SG, Carlson J. Parental Stressor Scale: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Nurs Res. 1993;42:148–52.
62.
Abidin RR. Parenting Stress Index - Fourth Edition - Short Form. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2012.
63.
Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun 1;150(6):782–6.
64.
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Test manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
65.
Barnes CR, Adamson‐Macedo EN. Perceived maternal parenting self‐efficacy (PMP S‐E) tool: Development and validation with mothers of hospitalized preterm neonates. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Dec 1;60(5):550–60.
66.
Wheeler BJ, Dennis CL. Psychometric Testing of the Modified Breastfeeding Self‐Efficacy Scale (Short Form) Among Mothers of Ill or Preterm Infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Jan 1;42(1):70–80.
67.
Squires J, Bricker D. Ages & Stages Questionnaires - Third Edition (ASQ-3): A parent-completed child monitoring system. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2009.
68.
Squires J, Twombly E, Bricker D, Potter L. ASQ-3 user's guide. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2009.
69.
Flamant C, Branger B, de La Rochebrochard E, Savagner C, Berlie I, Rozé JC. Parent-completed developmental screening in premature children: a valid tool for follow-up programs. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20004.
70.
Schonhaut L, Armijo I, Schonstedt M, Alvarez J, Cordero M. Validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in term and preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):e1468–e1474.
Metadata
Title
Family Integrated Care (FICare) in Level II Neonatal Intensive Care Units: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Authors
Karen M. Benzies
Vibhuti Shah
Khalid Aziz
Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
Luz Palacio-Derflingher
Jeanne Scotland
Jill Larocque
Kelly Mrklas
Esther Suter
Christopher Naugler
Henry T. Stelfox
Radha Chari
Abhay Lodha
Alberta FICare Level II NICU Study Team
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2181-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue

Commentary

The possibility of critical realist randomised controlled trials

Study protocol

The ExPeCT (Examining Exercise, Prostate Cancer and Circulating Tumour Cells) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

Decreasing Delirium through Music (DDM) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (the GASTROS study)

Study protocol

The efficacy of varenicline in achieving abstinence among waterpipe tobacco smokers – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

The Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial