Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Effectiveness of the ‘Who’s Challenging Who’ support staff training intervention to improve attitudes and empathy towards adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviours: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Elizabeth Randell, Richard P. Hastings, Rachel McNamara, Roseanna Knight, David Gillespie, Zachary Taylor

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Findings suggest approximately one in six people with intellectual disability engage in ‘challenging behaviours’, which include aggression towards others/property and self-injurious actions. In residential settings, actions of staff members can make challenging behaviours more likely to occur, or make these behaviours worse. In particular, negative attitudes from members of staff and lack of understanding about the reasons for challenging behaviour are contributory factors. ‘Who’s Challenging Who?’ (WCW) training is designed to emphasise the role of staff in residential settings as a challenge also to people with intellectual disability. The course is delivered jointly by a trainer with intellectual disability who has been labelled as having challenging behaviour, along with a trainer without intellectual disability.

Methods

This is a cluster randomised two-arm trial of WCW training versus a waiting list control. Overall, 118 residential settings will be recruited and randomised on a 1:1 ratio. Within each setting, two members of staff will be invited to take part in the trial. Participants will complete assessments at baseline and at 6 and 20 weeks. WCW is a half day initial training course with some follow-on coaching to ensure implementation. The primary outcome is changes in staff empathy towards people with challenging behaviour. Secondary outcomes at the staff level include confidence, attitudes and work-related well-being. Secondary outcomes at the residential setting level include recorded incidents of aggressive challenging behaviour, and use of any restrictive practices.

Discussion

If the results of the cluster randomised trial are positive, we will disseminate the findings widely and make all training manuals and materials freely available for anyone in intellectual disability services (and beyond) to use. Our training approach may have wider implications in other areas of social care. It may also provide a generally applicable model for how to train people with intellectual disability to act as co-trainers in intellectual disability social care settings. People with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour have already been involved centrally with the design, development and pilot evaluation of WCW and will also be fully involved throughout this trial.

Trial registration

Registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry on 8th December 2015: ISRCTN53763600.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Emerson E, Einfield SL. Challenging Behaviour. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRef Emerson E, Einfield SL. Challenging Behaviour. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hastings RP. Do challenging behaviors affect staff psychological well-being? Issues of causality and mechanism. Am J Ment Retard. 2002;107(6):455–67.CrossRefPubMed Hastings RP. Do challenging behaviors affect staff psychological well-being? Issues of causality and mechanism. Am J Ment Retard. 2002;107(6):455–67.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hastings RP. Parental stress and behaviour problems of children with developmental disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2002;27(3):149–60.CrossRef Hastings RP. Parental stress and behaviour problems of children with developmental disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2002;27(3):149–60.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Knapp M, et al. Intellectual disability, challenging behaviour and cost in care accommodation: what are the links? Health Soc Care Community. 2005;13(4):297–306.CrossRefPubMed Knapp M, et al. Intellectual disability, challenging behaviour and cost in care accommodation: what are the links? Health Soc Care Community. 2005;13(4):297–306.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bowring DL, et al. Challenging behaviours in adults with an intellectual disability: A total population study and exploration of risk indices. Br J Clin Psychol. 2017;56(1):16–32.CrossRefPubMed Bowring DL, et al. Challenging behaviours in adults with an intellectual disability: A total population study and exploration of risk indices. Br J Clin Psychol. 2017;56(1):16–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jones S, et al. Prevalence of, and factors associated with, problem behaviors in adults with intellectual disabilities. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(9):678–86.CrossRefPubMed Jones S, et al. Prevalence of, and factors associated with, problem behaviors in adults with intellectual disabilities. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(9):678–86.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hastings RP, et al. A conceptual framework for understanding why challenging behaviours occur in people with developmental disabilities. Int J Posit Behav Support. 2013;3(2):5–13. Hastings RP, et al. A conceptual framework for understanding why challenging behaviours occur in people with developmental disabilities. Int J Posit Behav Support. 2013;3(2):5–13.
8.
go back to reference Royal College of Psychiatrists. Challenging Behaviour: A Unified Approach. London: Psychological Society and Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists; 2007. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Challenging Behaviour: A Unified Approach. London: Psychological Society and Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists; 2007.
9.
go back to reference Hastings RP, Remington B. Rules of Engagement: Toward an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior. Res Dev Disabil. 1994;15(4):279–98.CrossRefPubMed Hastings RP, Remington B. Rules of Engagement: Toward an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior. Res Dev Disabil. 1994;15(4):279–98.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hastings RP. Staff beliefs about the challenging behaviors of children and adults with mental retardation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1997;17(7):775–90.CrossRefPubMed Hastings RP. Staff beliefs about the challenging behaviors of children and adults with mental retardation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1997;17(7):775–90.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ager A, O'May F. Issues in the definition and implementation of “best practice” for staff delivery of interventions for challenging behaviour. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2001;26(3):243–56.CrossRef Ager A, O'May F. Issues in the definition and implementation of “best practice” for staff delivery of interventions for challenging behaviour. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2001;26(3):243–56.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hutchinson L, et al. Who’s Challenging Who? Changing attitudes towards those whose behaviour challenges. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014;58(2):99–109.CrossRefPubMed Hutchinson L, et al. Who’s Challenging Who? Changing attitudes towards those whose behaviour challenges. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014;58(2):99–109.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference MacDonald A, McGill P. Outcomes of staff training in positive behaviour support: a systematic review. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013;25(1):17–33.CrossRef MacDonald A, McGill P. Outcomes of staff training in positive behaviour support: a systematic review. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013;25(1):17–33.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Allport GW. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1954. Allport GW. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1954.
15.
go back to reference Griffith GM, Hutchinson L, Hastings RP. “I’m not a patient, I’m a person”: the experiences of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour – a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2013;20(4):469–88.CrossRef Griffith GM, Hutchinson L, Hastings RP. “I’m not a patient, I’m a person”: the experiences of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour – a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2013;20(4):469–88.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Griffith GM, Hastings RP. ‘He’s hard work, but he’s worth it’. The experience of caregivers of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014;27(5):401–19.CrossRefPubMed Griffith GM, Hastings RP. ‘He’s hard work, but he’s worth it’. The experience of caregivers of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014;27(5):401–19.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rojahn J, et al. The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Part I: development and provisional clinical reference data. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012;56(5):527–45.CrossRefPubMed Rojahn J, et al. The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Part I: development and provisional clinical reference data. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012;56(5):527–45.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rojahn J, et al. The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Part II: reliability and validity. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012;56(5):546–65.CrossRefPubMed Rojahn J, et al. The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Part II: reliability and validity. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012;56(5):546–65.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hastings RP, Brown T. Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self-efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002;46:144–50.CrossRefPubMed Hastings RP, Brown T. Behavioural knowledge, causal beliefs and self-efficacy as predictors of special educators’ emotional reactions to challenging behaviours. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002;46:144–50.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Henry D, et al. The community living attitudes scale, mental retardation form: development and psychometric properties. Ment Retard. 1996;34(3):149–58.PubMed Henry D, et al. The community living attitudes scale, mental retardation form: development and psychometric properties. Ment Retard. 1996;34(3):149–58.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Paradise LV. Maslach Burnout Inventory, Research Edition – Manual. Pers Guid J. 1983;61(6):382. Paradise LV. Maslach Burnout Inventory, Research Edition – Manual. Pers Guid J. 1983;61(6):382.
23.
go back to reference Lunsky Y, et al. Perceptions of positive contributions and burnout in community developmental disability workers. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;52(4):249–57.CrossRefPubMed Lunsky Y, et al. Perceptions of positive contributions and burnout in community developmental disability workers. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;52(4):249–57.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hastings RP, Horne S, Mitchell G. Burnout in direct care staff in intellectual disability services: a factor analytic study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004;48:268–73.CrossRefPubMed Hastings RP, Horne S, Mitchell G. Burnout in direct care staff in intellectual disability services: a factor analytic study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004;48:268–73.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lofthouse RE, et al. Dynamic risk and violence in individuals with an intellectual disability: tool development and initial validation. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2014;25(3):288–306.CrossRef Lofthouse RE, et al. Dynamic risk and violence in individuals with an intellectual disability: tool development and initial validation. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2014;25(3):288–306.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference McMillan D, Hastings RP, Coldwell J. Clinical and actuarial prediction of physical violence in a forensic intellectual disability hospital: a longitudinal study. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2004;17(4):255–65.CrossRef McMillan D, Hastings RP, Coldwell J. Clinical and actuarial prediction of physical violence in a forensic intellectual disability hospital: a longitudinal study. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2004;17(4):255–65.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference van Oorsouw WMWJ, et al. Training staff serving clients with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analysis of aspects determining effectiveness. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30(3):503–11.CrossRefPubMed van Oorsouw WMWJ, et al. Training staff serving clients with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analysis of aspects determining effectiveness. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30(3):503–11.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Totsika V, et al. Interactive training for active support: perspectives from staff. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2008;33(3):225–38.CrossRefPubMed Totsika V, et al. Interactive training for active support: perspectives from staff. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2008;33(3):225–38.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of the ‘Who’s Challenging Who’ support staff training intervention to improve attitudes and empathy towards adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviours: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Elizabeth Randell
Richard P. Hastings
Rachel McNamara
Roseanna Knight
David Gillespie
Zachary Taylor
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2175-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue