Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access

Authors: G. A. Powell, L. J. Bonnett, C. Tudur-Smith, D. A. Hughes, P. R. Williamson, A. G. Marson

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT using standard prospective methods. This paper will summarise available UK routinely recorded data sources and discuss our experience with the feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data for participants of a RCT before finally proposing recommendations for improving the access and implementation of routinely recorded data in RCTs.

Methods

Setting: the case study RCT is the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial, a pragmatic, UK, multicentre, phase IV RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatments for newly diagnosed epilepsy.
Participants: 98 participants have provided written consent to permit the request of routinely recorded data.
Study procedures: routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data were identified and data requested through formal applications from available data holders for the duration that participants have been recruited into SANAD II. The feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data during a RCT is assessed and recommendations for improving access proposed.

Results

Secondary-care clinical and socioeconomic data is recorded on a national basis and can be accessed, although there are limitations in the application process. Primary-care data are recorded by a number of organisations on a de-identified basis but access for specific individuals has not been feasible. Access to data recorded by non-clinical sources, including The Department for Work and Pensions and The Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency, was not successful.

Conclusions

Recommendations discussed include further research to assess the attributes of routinely recorded data, an assessment of public perceptions and the development of strategies to collaboratively improve access to routinely recorded data for research.

Trial registration

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN30294119. Registered on 3 July 2012. EudraCT No: 2012-001884-64. Registered on 9 May 2012.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Lewsey JD, et al. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(22):1–45. i-iv. Lewsey JD, et al. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(22):1–45. i-iv.
4.
go back to reference Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A. Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess (Winch Eng). 2005;9(20):1–92. iii-iv. Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A. Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess (Winch Eng). 2005;9(20):1–92. iii-iv.
5.
go back to reference Clarson LE, et al. Increased risk of vascular disease associated with gout: a retrospective, matched cohort study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(4):642–7.CrossRefPubMed Clarson LE, et al. Increased risk of vascular disease associated with gout: a retrospective, matched cohort study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(4):642–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McGregor J, et al. The Health Informatics Trial Enhancement Project (HITE): using routinely collected primary care data to identify potential participants for a depression trial. Trials. 2010;11:39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McGregor J, et al. The Health Informatics Trial Enhancement Project (HITE): using routinely collected primary care data to identify potential participants for a depression trial. Trials. 2010;11:39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Williams JG, et al. Can randomised trials rely on existing electronic data? A feasibility study to explore the value of routine data in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess (Winch Eng). 2003;7(26):1–117. iii, v-x. Williams JG, et al. Can randomised trials rely on existing electronic data? A feasibility study to explore the value of routine data in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess (Winch Eng). 2003;7(26):1–117. iii, v-x.
8.
go back to reference Gulliford MC, et al. Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study). Trials. 2014;15(1):220. Gulliford MC, et al. Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study). Trials. 2014;15(1):220.
13.
go back to reference Sayers A, et al. Evidence for a persistent, major excess in all cause admissions to hospital in children with type-1 diabetes: results from a large Welsh national matched community cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e005644.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sayers A, et al. Evidence for a persistent, major excess in all cause admissions to hospital in children with type-1 diabetes: results from a large Welsh national matched community cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e005644.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference (US) National Research Council. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. National Academies Press, Washington DC (US); 2010. (US) National Research Council. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. National Academies Press, Washington DC (US); 2010.
18.
go back to reference Nelson EC, Dixon-Woods M, Batalden PB, Homa K, Van Citters AD, Morgan TS, Eftimovska E, Fisher ES, Ovretveit J, Harrison W, Lind C, Lindblad S. Patient focused registries can improve health, care and science. BMJ. 2016;354:i3319. Nelson EC, Dixon-Woods M, Batalden PB, Homa K, Van Citters AD, Morgan TS, Eftimovska E, Fisher ES, Ovretveit J, Harrison W, Lind C, Lindblad S. Patient focused registries can improve health, care and science. BMJ. 2016;354:i3319.
20.
go back to reference Van Staa TP, Goldacre B, Buchan I, Smeeth L. Big health data: the need to earn public trust after past management. BMJ. 2016;354:95–7. Van Staa TP, Goldacre B, Buchan I, Smeeth L. Big health data: the need to earn public trust after past management. BMJ. 2016;354:95–7.
22.
go back to reference Bouras G, et al. Linked hospital and primary care database analysis of the incidence and impact of psychiatric morbidity following gastrointestinal cancer surgery in England. Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):93–9.CrossRefPubMed Bouras G, et al. Linked hospital and primary care database analysis of the incidence and impact of psychiatric morbidity following gastrointestinal cancer surgery in England. Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):93–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Turner EL, et al. Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP). Br J Cancer. 2014;110(12):2829–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turner EL, et al. Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP). Br J Cancer. 2014;110(12):2829–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Ismail SI, Puyk B. The rise of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): 11-year trend analysis using Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) data. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(6):495–8.CrossRefPubMed Ismail SI, Puyk B. The rise of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): 11-year trend analysis using Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) data. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(6):495–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ahmed A, et al. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Scotland 2000–2010: improved outcomes but a significant weekend effect. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(38):10890–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahmed A, et al. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Scotland 2000–2010: improved outcomes but a significant weekend effect. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(38):10890–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Herrett E, et al. Text messaging reminders for influenza vaccine in primary care: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (TXT4FLUJAB). BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herrett E, et al. Text messaging reminders for influenza vaccine in primary care: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial (TXT4FLUJAB). BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Hill T, et al. Antidepressant use and risk of epilepsy and seizures in people aged 20 to 64 years: cohort study using a primary care database. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hill T, et al. Antidepressant use and risk of epilepsy and seizures in people aged 20 to 64 years: cohort study using a primary care database. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference González-Pérez A, et al. Incidence and predictors of hemorrhagic stroke in users of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(10):2321–8.CrossRefPubMed González-Pérez A, et al. Incidence and predictors of hemorrhagic stroke in users of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(10):2321–8.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Clarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials. 2007;8:39. Clarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials. 2007;8:39.
Metadata
Title
Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
Authors
G. A. Powell
L. J. Bonnett
C. Tudur-Smith
D. A. Hughes
P. R. Williamson
A. G. Marson
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue