Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Update

Positioning In Macular hole Surgery (PIMS): statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Lauren Bell, Richard Hooper, Catey Bunce, Saruban Pasu, James Bainbridge

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The treatment of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes involves surgery to close the hole. Some surgeons advise patients to adopt a face-down position to increase the likelihood of successful macular hole closure. However, patients often find the face-down positioning arduous. There is a lack of conclusive evidence that face-down positioning improves the outcome. The ‘Positioning In Macular hole Surgery’ (PIMS) trial will assess whether advice to position face-down after surgery improves the surgical success rate for the closure of large (≥400 μm) macular holes.

Methods/design

The PIMS trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial with 1:1 randomisation. Patients (n = 192) with macular holes (≥400 μm) will be randomised after surgery to either face-down positioning or face-forward positioning for at least 8 h (which can be either consecutive or nonconsecutive) a day, for 5 days following surgery. Inclusion criteria are: presence of an idiopathic full-thickness macular hole ≥400 μm in diameter, as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans, on either or both eyes; patients electing to have surgery for a macular hole, with or without simultaneous phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant; ability and willingness to position face-down or in an inactive face-forward position; a history of visual loss suggesting a macular hole of 12 months’ or less duration. The primary outcome is successful macular hole closure at 3 months post surgery. The treatment effect will be reported as an odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, adjusted for size of macular hole and phakic lens status at baseline. Secondary outcome measures at 3 months are: further surgery for macular holes performed or planned (of those with unsuccessful closure); patient-reported experience of positioning; whether patients report they would still have elected to have the operation given what they know at follow-up; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using Snellen charts at a standard distance of 6 m; patient-reported health and quality of life assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).

Discussion

The PIMS trial is the first multicentre randomised control trial to investigate the value of face-down positioning following macular hole standardised surgery.

Trial registration

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry, ID: ISRCTN12410596. Registered on 11 February 2015.
United Kingdom Clinical Research Network, ID: UKCRN17966. Registered on 26 November 2014.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lange CAK, et al. Pilot randomised controlled trial of face-down positioning following macular hole surgery. Eye. 2012;26(2):272–7.CrossRefPubMed Lange CAK, et al. Pilot randomised controlled trial of face-down positioning following macular hole surgery. Eye. 2012;26(2):272–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pasu S, et al. PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial—a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pasu S, et al. PIMS (Positioning In Macular hole Surgery) trial—a multicentre interventional comparative randomised controlled clinical trial comparing face-down positioning, with an inactive face-forward position on the outcome of surgery for large macular holes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Ellis JD, Baines PS. Patient perspectives on macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(4):622–3.CrossRefPubMed Ellis JD, Baines PS. Patient perspectives on macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(4):622–3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Guillaubey A, et al. Comparison of face-down and seated position after idiopathic macular hole surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(1):128–34.CrossRefPubMed Guillaubey A, et al. Comparison of face-down and seated position after idiopathic macular hole surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(1):128–34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Longitudinal Data/Panel Data Reference Manual Release 14. Stata Press, editor. College Station, TX, USA. StataCorp. Stata Longitudinal Data/Panel Data Reference Manual Release 14. Stata Press, editor. College Station, TX, USA.
8.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Base Reference Manual Release 14. Stata Press, editor. College Station, TX, USA. StataCorp. Stata Base Reference Manual Release 14. Stata Press, editor. College Station, TX, USA.
9.
go back to reference Holladay JT. Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(2):287–90. Holladay JT. Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(2):287–90.
10.
go back to reference Brader HS, et al. Early progression of geographic atrophy in the Complications of Age-related macular degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(7):3790. Brader HS, et al. Early progression of geographic atrophy in the Complications of Age-related macular degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(7):3790.
Metadata
Title
Positioning In Macular hole Surgery (PIMS): statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Lauren Bell
Richard Hooper
Catey Bunce
Saruban Pasu
James Bainbridge
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2020-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue