Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial

Authors: Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Andrew D. Oxman, Matthew Oxman, Sarah Rosenbaum, Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Margaret Kaseje, Iain Chalmers, Atle Fretheim, Nelson K. Sewankambo

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ability to appraise claims about the benefits and harms of treatments is crucial for informed health care decision-making. This research aims to enable children in East African primary schools (the clusters) to acquire and retain skills that can help them make informed health care choices by improving their ability to obtain, process and understand health information. The trial will evaluate (at the individual participant level) whether specially designed learning resources can teach children some of the key concepts relevant to appraising claims about the benefits and harms of health care interventions (treatments).

Methods

This is a two-arm, cluster-randomised trial with stratified random allocation. We will recruit 120 primary schools (the clusters) between April and May 2016 in the central region of Uganda. We will stratify participating schools by geographical setting (rural, semi-urban, or urban) and ownership (public or private).
The Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources consist of a textbook and a teachers’ guide. Each of the students in the intervention arm will receive a textbook and attend nine lessons delivered by their teachers during a school term, with each lesson lasting 80 min. The lessons cover 12 key concepts that are relevant to assessing claims about treatments and making informed health care choices. The second arm will carry on with the current primary school curriculum.
We have designed the Claim Evaluation Tools to measure people’s ability to apply key concepts related to assessing claims about the effects of treatments and making informed health care choices. The Claim Evaluation Tools use multiple choice questions addressing each of the 12 concepts covered by the IHC school resources. Using the Claim Evaluation Tools we will measure two primary outcomes: (1) the proportion of children who ‘pass’, based on an absolute standard and (2) their average scores.

Discussion

As far as we are aware this is the first randomised trial to assess whether key concepts needed to judge claims about the effects of treatment can be taught to primary school children. Whatever the results, they will be relevant to learning how to promote critical thinking about treatment claims.
Trial status: the recruitment of study participants was ongoing at the time of manuscript submission.

Trial registration

Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, trial identifier: PACTR20160600167​9337. Registered on 13 June 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. Washington: US Government Printing Office; 2010. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. Washington: US Government Printing Office; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Sanders LM, Federico S, Klass P, Abrams MA, Dreyer B. Literacy and child health: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:131–40.CrossRefPubMed Sanders LM, Federico S, Klass P, Abrams MA, Dreyer B. Literacy and child health: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:131–40.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR, Fishwick L. How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1853–62.CrossRefPubMed Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR, Fishwick L. How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1853–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weinstein ND. What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;25:15–20.CrossRef Weinstein ND. What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;25:15–20.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tickner S, Leman PJ, Woodcock A. Factors underlying suboptimal childhood immunisation. Vaccine. 2006;24:7030–6.CrossRefPubMed Tickner S, Leman PJ, Woodcock A. Factors underlying suboptimal childhood immunisation. Vaccine. 2006;24:7030–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Robinson EJ, Kerr CE, Stevens AJ, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, et al. Lay public’s understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(8):1–192.CrossRefPubMed Robinson EJ, Kerr CE, Stevens AJ, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, et al. Lay public’s understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(8):1–192.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stead M, Eadie D, Gordon D, Angus K. ‘Hello, hello—it’s English I speak!’ a qualitative exploration of patients’ understanding of the science of clinical trials. J Medical Ethics. 2005;31:664–9.CrossRef Stead M, Eadie D, Gordon D, Angus K. ‘Hello, hello—it’s English I speak!’ a qualitative exploration of patients’ understanding of the science of clinical trials. J Medical Ethics. 2005;31:664–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966–72.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966–72.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Davis TC, Wolf MS, Arnold CL, Byrd RS, Long SW, Springer T, et al. Development and validation of the Rapid Estimate of Adolescent Literacy in Medicine (REALM-Teen): a tool to screen adolescents for below-grade reading in health care settings. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1707–14.CrossRefPubMed Davis TC, Wolf MS, Arnold CL, Byrd RS, Long SW, Springer T, et al. Development and validation of the Rapid Estimate of Adolescent Literacy in Medicine (REALM-Teen): a tool to screen adolescents for below-grade reading in health care settings. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1707–14.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Herman AD, Mayer GG. Reducing the use of emergency medical resources among Head Start families: a pilot study. J Community Health. 2004;29:197–208.CrossRefPubMed Herman AD, Mayer GG. Reducing the use of emergency medical resources among Head Start families: a pilot study. J Community Health. 2004;29:197–208.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wilson FL, Brown DL, Stephens-Ferris M. Can easy to read immunisation information increase knowledge in urban low-income mothers? J Pediatr Nurs. 2006;21:4–12.CrossRefPubMed Wilson FL, Brown DL, Stephens-Ferris M. Can easy to read immunisation information increase knowledge in urban low-income mothers? J Pediatr Nurs. 2006;21:4–12.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yin HS, Forbis SG, Dreyer BP. Health literacy and pediatric health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2007;37:258–86.CrossRefPubMed Yin HS, Forbis SG, Dreyer BP. Health literacy and pediatric health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2007;37:258–86.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Driessnack M, Chung S, Perkhounkova E, Hein M. Using the ‘Newest Vital Sign’ to assess health literacy in children. J Pediatr Health Care. 2014;28:165–71.CrossRefPubMed Driessnack M, Chung S, Perkhounkova E, Hein M. Using the ‘Newest Vital Sign’ to assess health literacy in children. J Pediatr Health Care. 2014;28:165–71.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dutta-Bergmann MJ. Primary sources of health information: comparisons in the domain of health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors. Health Commun. 2004;16:273–88.CrossRef Dutta-Bergmann MJ. Primary sources of health information: comparisons in the domain of health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors. Health Commun. 2004;16:273–88.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mercer N, Dawes L, Wegerif R, Sams C. Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. Brit Educ Res J. 2004;30:359–77.CrossRef Mercer N, Dawes L, Wegerif R, Sams C. Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. Brit Educ Res J. 2004;30:359–77.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Evans DK, Popova A. What really works to improve learning in developing countries? An analysis of divergent findings in systematic reviews, Policy Research Working Paper 7203. Washington: World Bank; 2015. Evans DK, Popova A. What really works to improve learning in developing countries? An analysis of divergent findings in systematic reviews, Policy Research Working Paper 7203. Washington: World Bank; 2015.
18.
go back to reference Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Waddington DI, Wade CA, Persson T. Strategies for teaching students to think critically a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2015;85:275–314. Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Waddington DI, Wade CA, Persson T. Strategies for teaching students to think critically a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2015;85:275–314.
19.
go back to reference Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Nsangi A, Semakula D. Measuring peoples’ understanding of the effects of treatments: a review of outcome measures. Syst Rev. 2016;5:215. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Nsangi A, Semakula D. Measuring peoples’ understanding of the effects of treatments: a review of outcome measures. Syst Rev. 2016;5:215.
20.
go back to reference Nordheim L, Gundersen MW, Espehaug B, Guttersrud Ø, Flottorp S. Effects of school-based educational interventions for enhancing adolescents’ abilities in critical appraisal of health claims: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161485.3. Nordheim L, Gundersen MW, Espehaug B, Guttersrud Ø, Flottorp S. Effects of school-based educational interventions for enhancing adolescents’ abilities in critical appraisal of health claims: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161485.3.
21.
go back to reference Cusack L, Del Mar CB, Chalmers I, Hoffmann TC. Education interventions to improve people’s understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2016;5:37. personal communication.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cusack L, Del Mar CB, Chalmers I, Hoffmann TC. Education interventions to improve people’s understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2016;5:37. personal communication.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Tamusuza A. Leaving school early: the quest for universal primary education in Uganda. Afr Stat J. 2011;13:110–51. Tamusuza A. Leaving school early: the quest for universal primary education in Uganda. Afr Stat J. 2011;13:110–51.
23.
go back to reference Burke K, Beegle K. Why children aren’t attending school: the case of Northwestern Tanzania. J Afr Econ. 2004;13:333–55.CrossRef Burke K, Beegle K. Why children aren’t attending school: the case of Northwestern Tanzania. J Afr Econ. 2004;13:333–55.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Deininger K. Does cost of schooling affect enrollment by the poor? Universal primary education in Uganda. Econ Educ Rev. 2003;22:291–305.CrossRef Deininger K. Does cost of schooling affect enrollment by the poor? Universal primary education in Uganda. Econ Educ Rev. 2003;22:291–305.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference International Bureau of Education. Uganda. World data on education, 2010/11. 7th ed. Geneva: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2010. International Bureau of Education. Uganda. World data on education, 2010/11. 7th ed. Geneva: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2010.
26.
go back to reference Uganda Bureau of Statistics KU. Uganda demographic and health survey 2011. Kampala: Uganda Bureau of Statistics; 2012. p. 18–25. Uganda Bureau of Statistics KU. Uganda demographic and health survey 2011. Kampala: Uganda Bureau of Statistics; 2012. p. 18–25.
27.
go back to reference Population Secretariat. The State of Uganda population report 2012. Kampala: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development; 2012. Population Secretariat. The State of Uganda population report 2012. Kampala: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development; 2012.
28.
go back to reference Semakula DN, Nsangi A, Oxman AD, Oxman M, Rosenbaum S, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, et al. Does the use of an educational podcast improve the ability of parents of primary school children to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a randomised trial? Trials. 2017;18:31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Semakula DN, Nsangi A, Oxman AD, Oxman M, Rosenbaum S, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, et al. Does the use of an educational podcast improve the ability of parents of primary school children to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a randomised trial? Trials. 2017;18:31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference The Informed Healthcare Choices Group. The Health Choices Book: learning to think carefully when making choices of treatments. A health science book. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2016. The Informed Healthcare Choices Group. The Health Choices Book: learning to think carefully when making choices of treatments. A health science book. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2016.
30.
go back to reference The Informed Healthcare Choices Group. Teachers’ Guide for The Health Choices Book: learning to think carefully when making choices about treatments. A health science book. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2016. The Informed Healthcare Choices Group. Teachers’ Guide for The Health Choices Book: learning to think carefully when making choices about treatments. A health science book. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2016.
31.
go back to reference Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Oxman AD, Chalmers I, Nsangi A, Glenton C, Lewin S, et al. Key concepts that people need to understand to assess claims about treatment effects. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:112–25.CrossRefPubMed Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Oxman AD, Chalmers I, Nsangi A, Glenton C, Lewin S, et al. Key concepts that people need to understand to assess claims about treatment effects. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:112–25.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Nsangi ASD, Oxman DA, Sewankambo KN. Teaching children in low income countries to assess claims about treatment effects; a prioritisation of key concepts. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:173–80.CrossRefPubMed Nsangi ASD, Oxman DA, Sewankambo KN. Teaching children in low income countries to assess claims about treatment effects; a prioritisation of key concepts. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:173–80.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach. 2015;37:312–22.CrossRefPubMed Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach. 2015;37:312–22.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Daniel Semakula, Allen Nsangi, Andy Oxman, Iain Chalmers, Sarah Rosenbaum, Øystein Guttersrud, The IHC group. Measuring ability to assess claims .about treatment effects: the development of the “Claim Evaluation Tools”. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e013184. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013184. Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Daniel Semakula, Allen Nsangi, Andy Oxman, Iain Chalmers, Sarah Rosenbaum, Øystein Guttersrud, The IHC group. Measuring ability to assess claims .about treatment effects: the development of the “Claim Evaluation Tools”. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e013184. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2016-013184.
35.
go back to reference Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Øystein Guttersrud, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Andrew D. Oxman, The IHC group. Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: a latent trait analysis of items from the ‘Claim Evaluation Tools’ database using Rasch modelling. BMJ Open. 2017;0:e013185. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013185. Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Øystein Guttersrud, Allen Nsangi, Daniel Semakula, Andrew D. Oxman, The IHC group. Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: a latent trait analysis of items from the ‘Claim Evaluation Tools’ database using Rasch modelling. BMJ Open. 2017;0:e013185. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2016-013185.
36.
go back to reference Livingston SA, Zieky MJ. Passing scores: a manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational tests. Princeton: Educational Testing Service; 1982. Livingston SA, Zieky MJ. Passing scores: a manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational tests. Princeton: Educational Testing Service; 1982.
37.
go back to reference Nedelsky L. Absolute grading standards for objective tests. Educ Psychol Meas. 1954;14:3–19.CrossRef Nedelsky L. Absolute grading standards for objective tests. Educ Psychol Meas. 1954;14:3–19.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Angoff WH. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike RL, editor. Educational measurement. Washington: American Council on Education; 1971. p. 514–5. Angoff WH. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike RL, editor. Educational measurement. Washington: American Council on Education; 1971. p. 514–5.
39.
go back to reference Christiansen TB, Lauritsen JM, editors. EpiData—Comprehensive data management and basic statistical analysis system. Odense: EpiData Association; 2010. Christiansen TB, Lauritsen JM, editors. EpiData—Comprehensive data management and basic statistical analysis system. Odense: EpiData Association; 2010.
40.
go back to reference Sun X, Briel M, Busse JW, You JJ, Akl EA, Mejza F, et al. Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2012;344:e1553.CrossRefPubMed Sun X, Briel M, Busse JW, You JJ, Akl EA, Mejza F, et al. Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2012;344:e1553.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Health Services Research Unit. University of Aberdeen. Cluster sample size calculator user manual. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen; 1999. Health Services Research Unit. University of Aberdeen. Cluster sample size calculator user manual. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen; 1999.
43.
go back to reference Schochet PZ. Statistical power for random assignment evaluations of education programs. J Educ Behav Stat. 2008;33:62–87.CrossRef Schochet PZ. Statistical power for random assignment evaluations of education programs. J Educ Behav Stat. 2008;33:62–87.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Nsangi A, Semakula D, Glenton C, et al. Resources to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: protocol for a process evaluation, IHC Working Paper. 2016. ISBN 978-82-8082-780-7. Nsangi A, Semakula D, Glenton C, et al. Resources to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: protocol for a process evaluation, IHC Working Paper. 2016. ISBN 978-82-8082-780-7.
Metadata
Title
Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
Authors
Allen Nsangi
Daniel Semakula
Andrew D. Oxman
Matthew Oxman
Sarah Rosenbaum
Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren
Laetitia Nyirazinyoye
Margaret Kaseje
Iain Chalmers
Atle Fretheim
Nelson K. Sewankambo
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1958-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue