Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2) photographic validation sub-study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Elizabeth McGinnis, Sarah Brown, Howard Collier, Phil Faulks, Rachael Gilberts, Clare Greenwood, Valerie Henderson, Delia Muir, Andrea Nelson, Jane Nixon, Isabelle Smith, Nikki Stubbs, Kay Walker, Lyn Wilson, Susanne Coleman

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

PRESSURE 2 is a randomised evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of two types of pressure relieving mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers. The primary endpoint is the time to development of a Category ≥2 pressure ulcer. The current ‘gold standard’ for the identification of a Category ≥2 pressure ulcer is expert clinical assessment. Due to the appearance of the bed, it is not possible to achieve blinding of the endpoint. This therefore poses a risk to the internal validity of the study.
A possible approach is to use photographs of skin sites, with central blinded review. However, there are practical and scientific concerns including whether patients would agree to photographs; the burden of data collection; the quality of photographs; the completeness of data; and how the use of photographs compares with the current ‘gold standard’. This validation sub-study aims to assess and quantify potential bias in the reporting of the trial endpoint.

Methods/design

Patients will be specifically asked to consent to photographs being taken of their skin sites. Photographs will be taken at first observation or when patients develop a new Category ≥2 pressure ulcer (to assess over-reporting). A 10% random sample of patients will be identified for additional photographs of two skin sites (one torso and one limb) with and without a pressure ulcer (if present) by an independent assessor (to assess the potential for under-reporting).
Staff will be trained to take photographs using a standardised camera and photographic technique. A ‘grey scale’ will be included in the photo to correct white balance. Photographs will be securely transferred for central review. Photographs will have white balance corrected, and the computer monitor will be calibrated prior to review.
Analysis will include assessment of under- and over-reporting, acceptability of photography to patients, secure transfer of data, quality of and confidence in blinded photograph review and sensitivity analysis using photograph assessment of primary outcome.

Discussion

This study will use photographs to contribute to the primary outcome of the trial. It will inform our understanding of the acceptability of photography for prevention trials and the possibility of other uses of photographic data in clinical work and research.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ISRCTN01151335. Registered on 14 May 2013.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown S, et al. Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown S, et al. Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Haesler EE. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. Perth: Cambridge Media; 2014. Haesler EE. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. Perth: Cambridge Media; 2014.
3.
go back to reference Nixon J, et al. Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(22):iii–101.CrossRef Nixon J, et al. Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(22):iii–101.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Defloor T, Schoonhoven L. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(8):952–9.CrossRefPubMed Defloor T, Schoonhoven L. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(8):952–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Institute of Medical Illustrators. Guide to good practice. Wound management. National guidelines. London: Institute of Medical Illustrators; 2012. Institute of Medical Illustrators. Guide to good practice. Wound management. National guidelines. London: Institute of Medical Illustrators; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Yang H, Thompson C, Bland M. The effect of clinical experience, judgment task difficulty and time pressure on nurses’ confidence calibration in a high fidelity clinical simulation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang H, Thompson C, Bland M. The effect of clinical experience, judgment task difficulty and time pressure on nurses’ confidence calibration in a high fidelity clinical simulation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
10.
go back to reference Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McGinnis E. The healing process of heel pressure ulcers: a review of the anatomy, tissue types and photgraphic evidence. In: 4th Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies. Yokahama: WUWHS; 2012. McGinnis E. The healing process of heel pressure ulcers: a review of the anatomy, tissue types and photgraphic evidence. In: 4th Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies. Yokahama: WUWHS; 2012.
13.
go back to reference Jull A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):175–82.CrossRefPubMed Jull A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg. 2008;95(2):175–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2) photographic validation sub-study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Elizabeth McGinnis
Sarah Brown
Howard Collier
Phil Faulks
Rachael Gilberts
Clare Greenwood
Valerie Henderson
Delia Muir
Andrea Nelson
Jane Nixon
Isabelle Smith
Nikki Stubbs
Kay Walker
Lyn Wilson
Susanne Coleman
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1851-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Trials 1/2017 Go to the issue