Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercise after Stroke (WAVES): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Authors: Sarah A. Moore, Ruth Da Silva, Madelaine Balaam, Lianne Brkic, Dan Jackson, Dan Jamieson, Thomas Ploetz, Helen Rodgers, Lisa Shaw, Frederike van Wijck, Christopher Price

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Loss of upper limb function affects up to 85 % of acute stroke patients. Recovery of upper limb function requires regular intensive practise of specific upper limb tasks. To enhance intensity of practice interventions are being developed to encourage patients to undertake self-directed exercise practice. Most interventions do not translate well into everyday activities and stroke patients continue to find it difficult remembering integration of upper limb movements into daily activities. A wrist-worn device has been developed that monitors and provides ‘live’ upper limb activity feedback to remind patients to use their stroke arm in daily activities (The CueS wristband). The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility of a multi-centre, observer blind, pilot randomised controlled trial of the CueS wristband in clinical stroke services.

Methods/design

This pilot randomised controlled feasibility trial aims to recruit 60 participants over 15 months from North East England. Participants will be within 3 months of stroke which has caused new reduced upper limb function and will still be receiving therapy. Each participant will be randomised to an intervention or control group. Intervention participants will wear a CueS wristband (between 8 am and 8 pm) providing “live” feedback towards pre-set movement goals through a simple visual display and vibration prompts whilst undertaking a 4-week upper limb therapy programme (reviewed twice weekly by an occupational/physiotherapist). Control participants will also complete the 4-week upper limb therapy programme but will wear a ‘sham’ CueS wristband that monitors upper limb activity but provides no feedback. Outcomes will determine study feasibility in terms of recruitment, retention, adverse events, adherence and collection of descriptive clinical and accelerometer motor performance data at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.

Discussion

The WAVES study will address an important gap in the evidence base by reporting the feasibility of undertaking an evaluation of emerging and affordable technology to encourage impaired upper limb activity after stroke. The study will establish whether the study protocol can be supported by clinical stroke services, thereby informing the design of a future multi-centre randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Trial registration

ISRCTN:​82306027. Registered 12 July 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke. 2013;8:25–32.CrossRefPubMed Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke. 2013;8:25–32.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, Bakx W, de Ruyter B, Lanfermann G, Kingma H. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1344–52.CrossRefPubMed Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, Bakx W, de Ruyter B, Lanfermann G, Kingma H. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1344–52.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hallett M, Wassermann EM, Cohen LG, Chmielowska J, Gerloff C. Cortical mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1998;10:131–42.CrossRefPubMed Hallett M, Wassermann EM, Cohen LG, Chmielowska J, Gerloff C. Cortical mechanisms of recovery of function after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1998;10:131–42.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:823–30.CrossRefPubMed Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:823–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wallace AC, Talelli P, Dileone M, Oliver R, Ward N, Cloud G, Greenwood R, Di Lazzaro V, Rothwell JC, Marsden JF. Standardizing the intensity of upper limb treatment in rehabilitation medicine. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:471–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wallace AC, Talelli P, Dileone M, Oliver R, Ward N, Cloud G, Greenwood R, Di Lazzaro V, Rothwell JC, Marsden JF. Standardizing the intensity of upper limb treatment in rehabilitation medicine. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:471–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40:2123–8.CrossRefPubMed Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40:2123–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bernhardt J, Chan J, Nicola I, Collier JM. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:43–8.CrossRefPubMed Bernhardt J, Chan J, Nicola I, Collier JM. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:43–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C, Hughes AM, Yardley L, Tedesco-Triccas L, Swain I. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C, Hughes AM, Yardley L, Tedesco-Triccas L, Swain I. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Seelen HA. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Seelen HA. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Godfrey A, Conway R, Meagher D, ALaighin G. Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:1364–86.CrossRefPubMed Godfrey A, Conway R, Meagher D, ALaighin G. Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:1364–86.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Holden A, McNaney R, Balaam M, Thompson R, Hammerla N, Ploetz T, Jackson D, Price CI, Brkic L, Olivier P. CueS: cueing for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke. In British HCI Conference Proceedings. Lincoln, UK; 2015. p. 18–25 Holden A, McNaney R, Balaam M, Thompson R, Hammerla N, Ploetz T, Jackson D, Price CI, Brkic L, Olivier P. CueS: cueing for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke. In British HCI Conference Proceedings. Lincoln, UK; 2015. p. 18–25
13.
go back to reference Da Silva R, Moore S, Jamieson D, Jackson D, Balaam M, Brittain K, Brkic L, Ploetz T, Rodgers H, Shaw L, et al. Wrist worn accelerometers with vibrating-alert to prompt exercises after stroke (WAVES). European Stroke Journal. 2016;1 Suppl 1:531. Da Silva R, Moore S, Jamieson D, Jackson D, Balaam M, Brittain K, Brkic L, Ploetz T, Rodgers H, Shaw L, et al. Wrist worn accelerometers with vibrating-alert to prompt exercises after stroke (WAVES). European Stroke Journal. 2016;1 Suppl 1:531.
14.
go back to reference van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–7.CrossRefPubMed van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:64–7.CrossRefPubMed Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:64–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brott T, Adams Jr HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–70.CrossRefPubMed Brott T, Adams Jr HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–70.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–92.CrossRefPubMed Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–92.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67:1189–94.CrossRefPubMed Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67:1189–94.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980;19:382–9.CrossRefPubMed Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980;19:382–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Halligan P, Wilson B, Cockburn J. A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12:95–9.CrossRefPubMed Halligan P, Wilson B, Cockburn J. A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12:95–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Dickersin KDM. SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols. Lancet. 2013;381:91–2.CrossRefPubMed Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Dickersin KDM. SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols. Lancet. 2013;381:91–2.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rodgers H, Mackintosh J, Price C, Wood R, McNamee P, Fearon T, Marritt A, Curless R. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:579–89.CrossRefPubMed Rodgers H, Mackintosh J, Price C, Wood R, McNamee P, Fearon T, Marritt A, Curless R. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:579–89.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Church C, Price C, Pandyan AD, Huntley S, Curless R, Rodgers H. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (sNMES) to the shoulder following acute stroke. Stroke. 2006;27:2995–3001.CrossRef Church C, Price C, Pandyan AD, Huntley S, Curless R, Rodgers H. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (sNMES) to the shoulder following acute stroke. Stroke. 2006;27:2995–3001.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11, CD010820. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11, CD010820.
26.
go back to reference Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–39.CrossRefPubMed Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–39.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercise after Stroke (WAVES): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
Authors
Sarah A. Moore
Ruth Da Silva
Madelaine Balaam
Lianne Brkic
Dan Jackson
Dan Jamieson
Thomas Ploetz
Helen Rodgers
Lisa Shaw
Frederike van Wijck
Christopher Price
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1628-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue