Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Hepatitis C – Assessment to Treatment Trial (HepCATT) in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Kirsty Roberts, John Macleod, Chris Metcalfe, Joanne Simon, Jeremy Horwood, William Hollingworth, Sharon Marlowe, Fiona H. Gordon, Peter Muir, Barbara Coleman, Peter Vickerman, Graham I. Harrison, Cherry-Ann Waldron, William Irving, Matthew Hickman

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Public Health England (PHE) estimates that there are upwards of 160,000 individuals in England and Wales with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but until now only around 100,000 laboratory diagnoses have been reported to PHE and of these 28,000 have been treated. Targeted case-finding in primary care is estimated to be cost-effective; however, there has been no robust randomised controlled trial evidence available of specific interventions. Therefore, this study aims to develop and conduct a complex intervention within primary care and to evaluate this approach using a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Methods/design

A total of 46 general practices in South West England will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a complex intervention comprising: educational training on HCV for the practice; poster and leaflet display in the practice waiting rooms to raise awareness and encourage opportunistic testing; a HCV risk prediction algorithm based on information on possible risk markers in the electronic patient record run using Audit + software (BMJ Informatica). The audit will then be used to recall and offer patients a HCV test. Control practices will follow usual care. The effectiveness of the intervention will be measured by comparing number and rates of HCV testing, the number and proportion of patients testing positive, onward referral, rates of specialist assessment and treatment in control and intervention practices. Intervention costs and health service utilisation will be recorded to estimate the NHS cost per new HCV diagnosis and new HCV patient initiating treatment. Longer-term cost-effectiveness of the intervention in improving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) will be extrapolated using a pre-existing dynamic health economic model. Patients’ and health care workers’ experiences and acceptability of the intervention will be explored through semi-structured qualitative interviews.

Discussion

This trial has the potential to make an important impact on patient care and will provide high-quality evidence to help general practitioners make important decisions on HCV testing and onward referral. If found to be effective and cost-effective the intervention is readily scalable and can be used to support the implementation of NICE recommendations on HCV case-finding.

Trial registration

ISRCTN61788850. Registered on 24 April 2015; Protocol Version: 2.0, 22 May 2015.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Williams R, et al. Addressing liver disease in the UK: a blueprint for attaining excellence in health care and reducing premature mortality from lifestyle issues of excess consumption of alcohol, obesity, and viral hepatitis. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1953–97.CrossRefPubMed Williams R, et al. Addressing liver disease in the UK: a blueprint for attaining excellence in health care and reducing premature mortality from lifestyle issues of excess consumption of alcohol, obesity, and viral hepatitis. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1953–97.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Harris RJ, et al. Hepatitis C prevalence in England remains low and varies by ethnicity: an updated evidence synthesis. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(2):187–92.CrossRefPubMed Harris RJ, et al. Hepatitis C prevalence in England remains low and varies by ethnicity: an updated evidence synthesis. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(2):187–92.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Martin NK, et al. Can antiviral therapy for hepatitis C reduce the prevalence of HCV among injecting drug user populations? A modeling analysis of its prevention utility. J Hepatol. 2011;54(6):1137–44.CrossRefPubMed Martin NK, et al. Can antiviral therapy for hepatitis C reduce the prevalence of HCV among injecting drug user populations? A modeling analysis of its prevention utility. J Hepatol. 2011;54(6):1137–44.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cullen BL, et al. Identifying former injecting drug users infected with hepatitis C: an evaluation of a general practice-based case-finding intervention. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(1):14–23.CrossRef Cullen BL, et al. Identifying former injecting drug users infected with hepatitis C: an evaluation of a general practice-based case-finding intervention. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(1):14–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Martin NK, Hickman M, Miners A, Hutchinson SJ, Taylor A, Vickerman P. Cost-effectiveness of HCV case-finding for people who inject drugs via dried blood spot testing in specialist addiction services and prisons. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003153. Martin NK, Hickman M, Miners A, Hutchinson SJ, Taylor A, Vickerman P. Cost-effectiveness of HCV case-finding for people who inject drugs via dried blood spot testing in specialist addiction services and prisons. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8). doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2013-003153.
8.
go back to reference Smith BD, Yartel AK. Comparison of hepatitis C virus testing strategies: birth cohort versus elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(3):233–41.CrossRefPubMed Smith BD, Yartel AK. Comparison of hepatitis C virus testing strategies: birth cohort versus elevated alanine aminotransferase levels. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(3):233–41.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Helsper C, et al. Follow-up of mild alanine aminotransferase elevation identifies hidden hepatitis C in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(596):e212–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Helsper C, et al. Follow-up of mild alanine aminotransferase elevation identifies hidden hepatitis C in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(596):e212–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Wolffram I, et al. Prevalence of elevated ALT values, HBsAg, and anti-HCV in the primary care setting and evaluation of guideline defined hepatitis risk scenarios. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1256–64.CrossRefPubMed Wolffram I, et al. Prevalence of elevated ALT values, HBsAg, and anti-HCV in the primary care setting and evaluation of guideline defined hepatitis risk scenarios. J Hepatol. 2015;62(6):1256–64.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Vriend HJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus prevalence in The Netherlands: migrants account for most infections. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(6):1310–7.CrossRefPubMed Vriend HJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus prevalence in The Netherlands: migrants account for most infections. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(6):1310–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hickman M, et al. Assessing IDU prevalence and health consequences (HCV, overdose and drug-related mortality) in a primary care trust: implications for public health action. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009;31(3):374–82.CrossRef Hickman M, et al. Assessing IDU prevalence and health consequences (HCV, overdose and drug-related mortality) in a primary care trust: implications for public health action. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009;31(3):374–82.CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Jones HE, Welton NJ, Ades AE, Pierce M, Davies W, Coleman B, Millar T, Hickman M. Problem drug use prevalence estimation revisited: heterogeneity in capture-recapture and the role of external evidence. Addiction. 2016;111(3):438–47.CrossRefPubMed Jones HE, Welton NJ, Ades AE, Pierce M, Davies W, Coleman B, Millar T, Hickman M. Problem drug use prevalence estimation revisited: heterogeneity in capture-recapture and the role of external evidence. Addiction. 2016;111(3):438–47.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sculpher M. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelines. Fam Pract. 2000;17 Suppl 1:S26–31.CrossRefPubMed Sculpher M. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelines. Fam Pract. 2000;17 Suppl 1:S26–31.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wright M, et al. Health benefits of antiviral therapy for mild chronic hepatitis C: randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(21):1–113. iii.CrossRef Wright M, et al. Health benefits of antiviral therapy for mild chronic hepatitis C: randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(21):1–113. iii.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Martin NK. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions aimed at promoting and offering hepatitis C testing to injecting drug users: an economic modelling report. 2012. Martin NK. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions aimed at promoting and offering hepatitis C testing to injecting drug users: an economic modelling report. 2012.
22.
go back to reference Thompson CJ, Castelnuovo E, Pitt M, Cramp M, Siebert U, Stein K. Case finding for hepatitis C in primary care: a cost utility analysis. Fam Pract. 2006;23(4):393–406.CrossRef Thompson CJ, Castelnuovo E, Pitt M, Cramp M, Siebert U, Stein K. Case finding for hepatitis C in primary care: a cost utility analysis. Fam Pract. 2006;23(4):393–406.CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hepatitis C – Assessment to Treatment Trial (HepCATT) in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Kirsty Roberts
John Macleod
Chris Metcalfe
Joanne Simon
Jeremy Horwood
William Hollingworth
Sharon Marlowe
Fiona H. Gordon
Peter Muir
Barbara Coleman
Peter Vickerman
Graham I. Harrison
Cherry-Ann Waldron
William Irving
Matthew Hickman
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1501-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue