Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Interim pressure garment therapy (4–6 mmHg) and its effect on donor site healing in burn patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Michelle L. Donovan, Michael J. Muller, Claire Simpson, Michael Rudd, Jennifer Paratz

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pressure garment therapy (PGT) is well accepted and commonly used by clinicians in the treatment of burns scars and grafts. The medium to high pressures (24–40 mmHg) in these garments can support scar minimisation, and evidence is well documented for this particular application. However, PGT specifically for burn donor sites, of which a sequela is also scarring, is not well documented. This study protocol investigates the impact of a low pressure (4–6 mmHg) interim garment on donor site healing and scarring. With a primary purpose of holding donor dressings in place, the application of the interim pressure garment (IPG) appears to have been twofold. IPGs for donor sites have involved inconsistent application with a focus on securing wound dressing rather than scar management. However, anecdotal and observational evidence suggests that IPGs also make a difference to some patient’s scar outcomes for donor sites. This study protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial designed to test the effectiveness of this treatment on reducing scarring to burn donor sites.

Methods/design

This study is a single-centre, single (assessor)-blinded, randomised control trial in patients with burns donor sites to their thighs. Patients will be randomly allocated to a control group (with no compression to donor sites) or to an experimental group (with compression to donor sites) as the comparative treatment. Groups will be compared at baseline regarding the important prognostic indicators: donor site location, depth, size, age, and time since graft (5 days). The IPG treatment will be administered post-operatively (on day 5). Follow-up assessments and garment replacement will be undertaken fortnightly for a period of 2 months.

Discussion

This study focuses on a unique area of burns scar management using a low-pressure tubular support garment for the reduction of donor site scars. Such therapy specifically for donor scar management is poorly represented in the literature. This study was designed to test a potentially cost-effective scar prevention for patients with donor sites to the thigh. No known studies of this nature have been carried out to date, and there is a need for rigorous clinical evidence for low-pressure support garments for donor site scar minimisation.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier ACTRN12610000127​000. Registered 8 Mar 2010.
Literature
1.
Wisely JA, Wilson E, Duncan RT, Tarrier N. Pre-existing psychiatric disorders psychological reactions to stress and the recovery of burn survivors. Burns. 2010;36:183–91.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Druery M, Brown TLH, Muller M. Long term functional outcomes and quality of life following severe burn injury. Burns. 2005;31:692–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Brown BC, McKenna SP, Siddhi K, McGrouthe DA, Bayat A. The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1049–58.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Muller MJ, Gahankari D, Herndon DN. Operative wound management. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 177–95.CrossRef
6.
Quinn T, Wasiak J, Cleland H. An examination of factors that affect return to work following burns: a systematic review of the literature. Burns. 2010;36:1021–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Anzarut A, Singh P, Tredget EE, Rowe BH, Olson J. The effectiveness of pressure garment therapy for the prevention of abnormal scarring after burn injury: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:77–84.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Demirtas Y, Yagmur C, Soylemez F, Ozturk N, Demir A. Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: a prospective clinical trial for comparison of five different dressing materials. Burns. 2010;36:999–1005.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Ripper S, Renneberg B, Landmann C, Weigel G, German G. Adherence to pressure garment therapy in adult burn patients. Burns. 2009;35:657–64.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Clark JA, Cheng JCY, Leung KS. Mechanical properties of normal skin and hypertrophic scars. Burns. 1996;22:443–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bloemen MC, van der Veer WM, Ulrich MM, van Zuijlen PP, Niessen FB, Middelkoop E. Prevention and curative management of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns. 2009;35:463–75.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Gurtner GC. Wound healing: normal and abnormal. In: Thorne CM, Bartlett SP, Beasley RW, Aston SJ, Gurtner GC, Spear SL, editors. Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery. 6th ed. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 15–22.
13.
Costa A, Peyrol S, Porto LC, Comparin JP, Foyatier JL, Desmouliere A. Mechanical forces induce scar remodelling: study in non-pressure versus pressure treated hypertrophic scars. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:1671–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
Li-Tsang CW, Feng B, Huang L, Liu X, Shu B, Chan YT, et al. A histological study on the effect of pressure therapy on the activities of myofibroblasts and keratinocytes in hypertrophic scar tissues after burn. Burns. 2015;41(5):1008–16.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Macintyre L, Baird M. Pressure garments for the use in the treatment of hypertrophic scars – a review of the problems associated with their use. Burns. 2006;32:10–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Candy LH, Cecilia LT, Ping ZY. Effect of different pressure magnitudes on hypertrophic scar in a Chinese population. Burns. 2010;36:1234–41.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Chang P, Laubenthal KN, Lewis RW, Rosenquist MD, Lindley-Smith P, Kealey GP. Prospective, randomised study of the efficacy of pressure garment therapy in patients with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16:473–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Watkins WB. Compresison garment sizing; challenges, issues and a solution. Plast Surg Nurs. 2010;30:85–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Engrav LH, Heimbach DM, Rivara FP, Noore ML, Carrougher GJ, Costa B, et al. 12 year within wound study of the effectiveness of custom pressure garment therapy. Burns. 2010;36:975–83.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Van den Kerckhove E, Stappaerts K, Fieuws S, Laperre J, Massage P, Flour M, et al. The assessment of erythema and thickness on burn related scars during pressure garment therapy as a preventative measure for hypertrophic scarring. Burns. 2005;31:696–702.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Larsen AM, Futtrup I. Watch the pressure – it drops! EWMA J. 2004;4:8–12.
25.
26.
Nedelec B, Correa JA, de Oliveira A, LaSalle L, Perrault I. Longitudinal burn scar quantification. Burns. 2014;40(8):1504–12.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Rose MP, Deitch EA. The clinical use of a tubular compression bandage, Tubigrip, for burn-scar therapy: a critical analysis. Burns. 1985;12:58–64.CrossRef
28.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Partsch H, Mosti G. Comparison of three portable instruments to measure compression pressure. Int Angiol. 2010;29(5):426–30.PubMed
30.
Sachdeva S. Fitzpatric skin typing: Applications in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75:93–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Nedlec B, Correa JA, Rachelska G, Armour A, LaSalle L. Quantitative measurement of Hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29:489–500.CrossRef
32.
Nedlec B, Correa JA, Rachelska G, Armour A, LaSalle L. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29:501–11.CrossRef
33.
van der Wal M, Bloemen M, Verhaegen P, Tuinebreijer W, de Vet H, van Zuijlen P. Objective colour measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue. J Burn Care Res. 2013;34:187–94.CrossRef
34.
Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM, Kreis RW, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen PPM. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation? Burns. 2004;30:103–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Mosti G, Rossari S. The importance of measuring sub bandage pressure and presentation of new measuring device [in Italian]. Acta Vulnol. 2008;6:31–6.
36.
Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, et al. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1960–5.CrossRefPubMed
37.
38.
Simons M, Tyack Z, Thynne A, Rynne D, DeJong H. Scar management. In: Edgar D, editor. Burn trauma rehabilitation: allied health Practice guidelines. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 175–209.
39.
Tyack Z, Wasiak J, Spinks A, Kimble R, Simons M. A guide to choosing a burn scale for clinical research use. Burns. 2013;39:1341–50.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Lenth RV. Java applets for power and sample size [computer software]. 2006.
Metadata
Title
Interim pressure garment therapy (4–6 mmHg) and its effect on donor site healing in burn patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Michelle L. Donovan
Michael J. Muller
Claire Simpson
Michael Rudd
Jennifer Paratz
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1329-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research

A pilot and feasibility randomised controlled study of Prolonged Exposure Treatment and supportive counselling for post-traumatic stress disorder in adolescents: a third world, task-shifting, community-based sample

Research

Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish

Study protocol

Antibiotic treatment for intermittent bladder catheterisation with once daily prophylaxis (the AnTIC study): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

The impact of a knowledge translation intervention employing educational outreach and a point-of-care reminder tool vs standard lay health worker training on tuberculosis treatment completion rates: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Walking adaptability therapy after stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Evaluation of the anti-fatigue effects of a traditional herbal drug, Gongjin-dan, under insufficient sleep conditions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial