Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Pipelle for Pregnancy (PIP): study protocols for three randomised controlled trials

Authors: Sarah Lensen, Wellington Martins, Carolina Nastri, Lynn Sadler, Cindy Farquhar

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The success rate of infertility treatments remains modest. Endometrial injury has been suggested as an intervention to increase the probability of pregnancy in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF). The majority of studies and systematic reviews have reported that endometrial injury improves the outcomes of IVF, intrauterine insemination and natural conception; however, the size and quality of the studies are poor. The low quality of the available evidence questions the presence of any real beneficial effect, and the applicability of the intervention in different populations remains unclear.

Methods/design

The PIP trials are three multi-centre, randomised controlled trials designed to test three separate hypotheses: whether endometrial injury increases the probability of live birth in women or couples
1) who are undergoing autologous embryo transfer as part of an IVF cycle (PIP-IVF),
2) with unexplained infertility who are attempting to conceive naturally (PIP-UE) and
3) with subfertility related to polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) who are on ovulation induction medication and attempting to conceive (PIP-PCOS).
Participants will be randomised to either undergo endometrial injury by endometrial pipelle biopsy or to:
• no intervention (PIP-IVF), or
• a sham procedure (PIP-PCOS and PIP-UE).
In PIP-IVF, endometrial injury will be carried out between day three of the cycle prior to the IVF cycle, and day three of the IVF cycle. In PIP-UE and PIP-PCOS, endometrial injury or a sham procedure will be undertaken between days 1–12 of a menstrual cycle or ovulation induction cycle respectively. Participants in PIP-UE and PIP-PCOS will then be followed for three cycles during which time they will attempt to conceive from sexual intercourse. To ensure allocation concealment, randomisation will be carried out using a web-based system or sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. The primary outcome is live birth. Secondary outcomes include ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage.
The required sample sizes for the PIP studies have been estimated at 840 (PIP-IVF), 350 (PIP-UE) and 280 (PIP-PCOS). Primary analysis will be as per intention-to-treat principles.

Discussion

The PIP trials are designed to address the gaps in the utility of endometrial scratching as a treatment for subfertility in three different populations. If the beneficial effect of this intervention can be confirmed in these settings, endometrial scratching will provide a cost-effective method for helping women and couples to conceive.

Trial registrations

PIP-IVF ACTRN12614000626​662 registered 13/6/2014; PIP-PCOS ACTRN12614000657​628 registered 24/6/2014; PIP-UE ACTRN12614000656​639 registered 24/6/2014. The trials are ongoing.
Literature
1.
Taylor A. ABC of subfertility: Extent of the problem. Br Med J. 2003;327(7412):434–6.CrossRef
2.
Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2189–201.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Simón C, Moreno C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Molecular interactions between embryo and uterus in the adhesion phase of human implantation. Hum Reprod. 1998;13 Suppl 3:219–36.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Nastri CO, Lensen S, Polanski L, Raine-Fenning N, Farquhar CM, Martins WP. Endometrial injury and reproductive outcomes: there’s more to this story than meets the horse’s blind eye. Hum Reprod. 2015;20:749.CrossRef
6.
Shahid A, Phool B, Yasmeen S. Comparison between dilatation & curettage and Pipelle’s endometrial sampling for safer evaluation in postmenopausal bleeding women. Pak J Biol Sci. 2013;7(4):1121–4.
7.
Hulka JF, Peterson HA, Phillips JM, Surrey MW. Operative hysteroscopy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1993 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;2(2):131–2.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Granot I, Dekel N, Bechor E, Segal I, Fieldust S, Barash A. Temporal analysis of connexin43 protein and gene expression throughout the menstrual cycle in human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):381–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Barash A, Dekel N, Fieldust S, Segal I, Schechtman E, Granot I. Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(6):1317–22.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Almog B, Shalom-Paz E, Dufort D, Tulandi T. Promoting implantation by local injury to the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2026–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
El-Toukhy T, Sunkara S, Khalaf Y. Local endometrial injury and IVF outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;25(4):345–54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Potdar N, Gelbaya T, Nardo LG. Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;25(6):561–71.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(1):14–38.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Karimzade MA, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. Local injury to the endometrium on the day of oocyte retrieval has a negative impact on implantation in assisted reproductive cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(3):499–503.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Gibreel A, Badawy A, El-Refai W, El-Adawi N. Endometrial scratching to improve pregnancy rate in couples with unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(3):680–4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Parsanezhad M, Dadras N, Maharlouei N, Neghahban L, Keramati P, Amini M. Pregnancy rate after endometrial injury in couples with unexplained infertility: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(11):869–74.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Baum M, Yerushalmi GM, Maman E, Kedem A, MacHtinger R, Hourvitz A, et al. Does local injury to the endometrium before IVF cycle really affect treatment outcome? Results of a randomized placebo controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28(12):933–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Yeung T, Chai J, Li R, Lee V, Ho P, Ng E. The effect of endometrial injury on ongoing pregnancy rate in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(11):2474–81.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Narvekar S, Gupta N, Shetty N, Kottur A, Srinivas M, Rao K. Does local endometrial injury in the nontransfer cycle improve the IVF-ET outcome in the subsequent cycle in patients with previous unsuccessful IVF? A randomized controlled pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2010;3(1):15–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Shohayeb A, El-Khayat W. Does a single endometrial biopsy regimen (S-EBR) improve ICSI outcome in patients with repeated implantation failure? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;164(2):176–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Siristatidis C, Vrachnis N, Vogiatzi P, Chrelias C, Retamar AQ, Bettocchi S, et al. Potential pathophysiological mechanisms of the beneficial role of endometrial injury in in vitro fertilization outcome. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(8):955–65.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo PB, Barash A, Or Y, Mor G, et al. Biopsy-induced inflammatory conditions improve endometrial receptivity: the mechanism of action. Reproduction. 2014;149(1):75–85.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo PB, Barash A, Or Y, Schechtman E, et al. Local injury of the endometrium induces an inflammatory response that promotes successful implantation. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2030–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Kalma Y, Granot I, Gnainsky Y, Or Y, Czernobilsky B, Dekel N, et al. Endometrial biopsy-induced gene modulation: first evidence for the expression of bladder-transmembranal uroplakin Ib in human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4):1042–9. e9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Granot I, Gnainsky Y, Dekel N. Endometrial inflammation and effect on implantation improvement and pregnancy outcome. Reproduction. 2012;144(6):661–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Jokimaa V, Oksjoki S, Kujari H, Vuorio E, Anttila L. Altered expression of genes involved in the production and degradation of endometrial extracellular matrix in patients with unexplained infertility and recurrent miscarriages. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8(12):1111–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Lessey BA, Holoch KJ, Franasiak J, Yuan L, Fritz MA, Young SL. Prospective assessment of mid-secretory endometrial LIF and beta3 integrin expression as a predictor of pregnancy outcome and endometriosis in unexplained infertility. Human Reproduction. 2012;27. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24690239.
28.
Hambartsoumian E. Endometrial leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) as a possible cause of unexplained infertility and multiple failures of implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998;39(2):137–43.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Bellver J, Martínez-Conejero JA, Labarta E, Alamá P, Melo MAB, Remohí J, et al. Endometrial gene expression in the window of implantation is altered in obese women especially in association with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2335–41. e8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Jana SK, Banerjee P, Mukherjee R, Chakravarty B, Chaudhury K. HOXA-11 mediated dysregulation of matrix remodeling during implantation window in women with endometriosis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(11):1505–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
32.
Yeung TW, Chai J, Li RH, Lee VC, Ho PC, Ng EH. Reply: Endometrial injury and reproductive outcomes: there’s more to this story than meets the horse’s blind eye. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):749–50.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Simón C, Bellver J. Scratching beneath ‘the Scratching Case’: systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the back door for evidence-based medicine. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1618–21.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Simón C, Bosch E, Bellver J. Reply: Endometrial scratching for women with repeated implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(12):2856–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, De Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HG, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;16(3):231–45.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41–7.CrossRef
38.
39.
40.
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):e1–37.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Guven S, Kart C, Unsal MA, Yildirim O, Odaci E, Yulug E. Endometrial injury may increase the clinical pregnancy rate in normoresponders undergoing long agonist protocol ICSI cycles with single embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173(1):58–62.CrossRef
42.
Loeb L. The experimental proof changes in the uterine decidua of guinea pig after mating. Zentralbl Allg Pathol. 1907;18:563–5.
43.
Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Maheshwari A, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, et al. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD009517.PubMed
44.
Hunault CC, Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, Collins JA, Evers JLH, te Velde ER. Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2019–26.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Clarke JF, Van Rumste MME, Farquhar CM, Johnson NP, Mol BWJ, Herbison P. Measuring outcomes in fertility trials: can we rely on clinical pregnancy rates? Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1647–51.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Legro RS, Barnhart HX, Schlaff WD, Carr BR, Diamond MP, Carson SA, et al. Clomiphene, metformin, or both for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(6):551–66.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Bang H, Flaherty SP, Kolahi J, Park J. Blinding assessment in clinical trials: a review of statistical methods and a proposal of blinding assessment protocol. Clin Res Regul Aff. 2010;27(2):42–51.CrossRef
48.
James KE, Block DA, Lee KK, Kraemer HC, Fuller RK. An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation - a VA cooperative study. Stat Med. 1996;15(13):1421–34.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Moorthy VS, Karam G, Vannice KS, Kieny M. Rationale for WHO’s new position calling for prompt reporting and public disclosure of interventional clinical trial results. PLoS Med. 2015;12(4):e1001819.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Pipelle for Pregnancy (PIP): study protocols for three randomised controlled trials
Authors
Sarah Lensen
Wellington Martins
Carolina Nastri
Lynn Sadler
Cindy Farquhar
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1301-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Comparison of exenatide with biphasic insulin aspart 30 on glucose variability in type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Commentary

Can “realist” randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?

Study protocol

Statistical design and analysis plan for an impact evaluation of an HIV treatment and prevention intervention for female sex workers in Zimbabwe: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

Polypharmacy in chronic diseases–Reduction of Inappropriate Medication and Adverse drug events in older populations by electronic Decision Support (PRIMA-eDS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Research

Appraising the uptake and use of recommendations for a common outcome data set for clinical trials: a case study in fall injury prevention

Study protocol

Melatonin in Youth: N-of-1 trials in a stimulant-treated ADHD Population (MYNAP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial