Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Sharon E. Straus, Huda Ashoor, Lesley A. Stewart, Mike Clarke, Andrea C. Tricco

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis is considered the “gold standard” for exploring the effectiveness of interventions in different subgroups of patients. However, obtaining IPD is time-consuming and contact with the researchers responsible for the original trials is usually required. To date, there are no studies evaluating different strategies to optimize the process for retrieval of IPD from such researchers. Our aim is to examine the impact of providing incentives to the researchers responsible for the trials eligible for a meta-analysis to submit their IPD.

Methods/Design

We updated our previously published systematic reviews for type 1 diabetes mellitus comparing long- and intermediate-acting insulin regimens (from January 2013 to June 2015) and for Alzheimer’s dementia comparing cognitive enhancers (from January 2015 to May 2015). Eligible were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilling the eligibility criteria of the systematic reviews. We will randomly allocate authors of the reports of these RCTs into an intervention or control group. Those allocated to the intervention group will be contacted by email, mail, and phone, and will be asked to provide the IPD from their RCT and will be given a financial incentive. Those allocated to the control group will be contacted by email, mail, and phone, but will not receive a financial incentive. Our primary outcome will be the proportion of authors who provide the IPD. The secondary outcomes will be the time to return the dataset (defined as the period between the information request and the authors’ response with the dataset), and completeness of data. We will compare the response rates in the two groups using the odds ratio and the corresponding 95 % confidence interval. We will also use binary logistic regression and cox regression analyses to examine whether different RCT characteristics, such as study size and sponsor information, influence the probability of providing IPD and the time needed to share the data.

Discussion

This study will determine whether a financial incentive affects response rates when seeking IPD from the original researchers. We will disseminate our findings in an open access scientific journal and present results at national and international conferences.

Trial registration

This trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov, ID number NCT02569411. Date of registration 5 October 2015.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
5.
go back to reference Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1385–9.CrossRefPubMed Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1385–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Parekh-Bhurke S, Kwok CS, Pang C, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder JJ, et al. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):349–57. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.022.CrossRefPubMed Parekh-Bhurke S, Kwok CS, Pang C, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder JJ, et al. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):349–57. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2010.​04.​022.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stewart LA, Clarke MJ. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group. Stat Med. 1995;14(19):2057–79.CrossRefPubMed Stewart LA, Clarke MJ. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group. Stat Med. 1995;14(19):2057–79.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Ioannidis JP, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, O’Brien TR. International meta-analysis of HIVHG. Commentary: meta-analysis of individual participants’ data in genetic epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(3):204–10.CrossRefPubMed Ioannidis JP, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, O’Brien TR. International meta-analysis of HIVHG. Commentary: meta-analysis of individual participants’ data in genetic epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(3):204–10.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dillman DA. Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2007. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2007.
22.
go back to reference Church A. Incentives in mail surveys: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 1993;57:62–79.CrossRef Church A. Incentives in mail surveys: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 1993;57:62–79.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jobber D, Saunders J, Mitchell VW. Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response. J Bus Res. 2004;57:21–5.CrossRef Jobber D, Saunders J, Mitchell VW. Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response. J Bus Res. 2004;57:21–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lesser V, Dillman D, Carlson J, Lorenz F, Mason R, Willits F. Quantifying the influence of incentives on mail survey response rates and nonresponse bias. 2001. Lesser V, Dillman D, Carlson J, Lorenz F, Mason R, Willits F. Quantifying the influence of incentives on mail survey response rates and nonresponse bias. 2001.
26.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Ashoor HM, Antony J, Beyene J, Veroniki AA, Isaranuwatchai W, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5459. doi:10.1136/bmj.g5459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tricco AC, Ashoor HM, Antony J, Beyene J, Veroniki AA, Isaranuwatchai W, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5459. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​g5459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Ashoor HM, Rios P, Hamid J, Ivory JD, Khan PA, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of cognitive enhancers for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: a rapidly updated systematic review and network meta-analysis. ODPRN. 2015. Tricco AC, Ashoor HM, Rios P, Hamid J, Ivory JD, Khan PA, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of cognitive enhancers for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: a rapidly updated systematic review and network meta-analysis. ODPRN. 2015.
28.
go back to reference Newton D. Synthesi.SR. Knowledge translation program, St. Michael’s Hospital: Toronto, Canada; 2012. Newton D. Synthesi.SR. Knowledge translation program, St. Michael’s Hospital: Toronto, Canada; 2012.
29.
go back to reference Veroniki AA, Straus SE, Ashoor HM, Hamid JS, Yu C, Tricco AC. Safety and effectiveness of long-acting versus intermediate-acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e010160. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Veroniki AA, Straus SE, Ashoor HM, Hamid JS, Yu C, Tricco AC. Safety and effectiveness of long-acting versus intermediate-acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e010160. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2015-010160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Veroniki A, Straus S, Ashoor H, Hamid J, Hemmelgarn B, Holroyd-Leduc J, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s dementia: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e010251. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Veroniki A, Straus S, Ashoor H, Hamid J, Hemmelgarn B, Holroyd-Leduc J, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s dementia: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e010251. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2015-010251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Middleton LJ, Champaneria R, Daniels JP, Bhattacharya S, Cooper KG, Hilken NH, et al. Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients. BMJ. 2010;341:c3929. doi:10.1136/bmj.c3929.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Middleton LJ, Champaneria R, Daniels JP, Bhattacharya S, Cooper KG, Hilken NH, et al. Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients. BMJ. 2010;341:c3929. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​c3929.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Asch DA, Christakis NA, Ubel PA. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives. Med Care. 1998;36(1):95–9.CrossRefPubMed Asch DA, Christakis NA, Ubel PA. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives. Med Care. 1998;36(1):95–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Everett SA, Price JH, Bedell AW, Telljohann SK. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians. Eval Health Prof. 1997;20(2):207–14.CrossRefPubMed Everett SA, Price JH, Bedell AW, Telljohann SK. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians. Eval Health Prof. 1997;20(2):207–14.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Gibson CA, Bailey BW, Carper MJ, Lecheminant JD, Kirk EP, Huang G, et al. Author contacts for retrieval of data for a meta-analysis on exercise and diet restriction. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):267–70. doi:10.1017/S0266462306051105.CrossRefPubMed Gibson CA, Bailey BW, Carper MJ, Lecheminant JD, Kirk EP, Huang G, et al. Author contacts for retrieval of data for a meta-analysis on exercise and diet restriction. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):267–70. doi:10.​1017/​S026646230605110​5.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Data Collection Checklist. Ottawa, Canada: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (EPOC). 2002. Data Collection Checklist. Ottawa, Canada: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (EPOC). 2002.
43.
go back to reference Higgins J. Green S. The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions; 2011. Higgins J. Green S. The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions; 2011.
44.
go back to reference Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1657–65. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3656.CrossRefPubMed Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1657–65. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2015.​3656.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Berlin JA, Santanna J, Schmid CH, Szczech LA, Feldman HI. Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head. Stat Med. 2002;21(3):371–87.CrossRefPubMed Berlin JA, Santanna J, Schmid CH, Szczech LA, Feldman HI. Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head. Stat Med. 2002;21(3):371–87.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Areti Angeliki Veroniki
Sharon E. Straus
Huda Ashoor
Lesley A. Stewart
Mike Clarke
Andrea C. Tricco
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1238-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Trials 1/2016 Go to the issue