Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

An evaluation of the DEXLIFE ‘self-selected’ lifestyle intervention aimed at improving insulin sensitivity in people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Grainne M. O’Donoghue, Aileen Kennedy, Gregers Stig Andersen, Eoin Durkan, Tanja Thybo, Margaret Sinnott, John J. Nolan, Donal J. O’Gorman

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the global escalation of type 2 diabetes and evidence consistently showing that its onset can be prevented or delayed by changing lifestyle behaviours, there is an urgent need to translate practical, affordable and acceptable interventions from the research setting into the real world. One such approach to lifestyle interventions might be the introduction of a programme in which the individual is provided with choice and facilitated to ‘self-select’ an exercise programme. Previous research has shown that this is likely to be less resource intensive, an essential requirement for success outside the controlled research environment, while at the same time promoting positive responses relating to adherence, competence and self-efficacy, essential attributes for long-term success. Through a two-group parallel-randomised controlled trial, this study aims to assess the clinical and psychological impact of the DEXLIFE ‘self-selected’ lifestyle modification programme in adults at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

Methods/design

A total of 360 subjects at risk of developing type 2 diabetes are randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to a control (n = 90) or intervention arm (n = 270). Randomization is stratified by age, sex and body mass index. The control arm receives general information on lifestyle and diabetes risk. The intervention group participate in a 12 week ‘self-selected’ supervised exercise training programme accompanied with dietary advice to improve food choices. Participants are given access to Dublin City University Sport (an on-campus gym) and asked to perform four exercise classes per week. Dublin City University Sport offers over 50 classes per week, many of which are medically supervised. If weight loss is indicated, reduction in total calorie intake by 600 kcal/day is advised. Common to all food plans is <10 % saturated fat intake, as well as a dietary fibre intake of >15 g/1000 kcal.
Insulin sensitivity is the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures include glucose function, fitness, body composition, anthropometrics, heart rate variability, lipid profiles, blood pressure, physical activity levels, dietary intake and quality of life.

Discussion

"Self-selected" lifestyle intervention has not previously been evaluated in type 2 diabetes prevention and if shown to be successful could be implemented in practice immediately.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN66987085.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Diabetes Federation. International Diabetes Federation diabetes atlas. 6th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2013. International Diabetes Federation. International Diabetes Federation diabetes atlas. 6th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2013.
2.
go back to reference Andersen GS, Thybo T, Cederberg H, Oresic M, Esteller M, Zorzano A, et al. The DEXLIFE study methods: identifying novel candidate biomarkers that predict progression to type 2 diabetes in high risk individuals. Diab Res Clin Prac. 2014;106:383–9.CrossRef Andersen GS, Thybo T, Cederberg H, Oresic M, Esteller M, Zorzano A, et al. The DEXLIFE study methods: identifying novel candidate biomarkers that predict progression to type 2 diabetes in high risk individuals. Diab Res Clin Prac. 2014;106:383–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tuomilehto J, Linsdtrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. New Eng J Med. 2001;344:1343–50.CrossRefPubMed Tuomilehto J, Linsdtrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. New Eng J Med. 2001;344:1343–50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The diabetes prevention program (DPP). Description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2165–71.CrossRef Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The diabetes prevention program (DPP). Description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2165–71.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lindström J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Eriksson JG, Hemiö K, et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet. 2006;368:1673–9.CrossRefPubMed Lindström J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Eriksson JG, Hemiö K, et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet. 2006;368:1673–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2009;374:1677–86.PubMedCentralCrossRef Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2009;374:1677–86.PubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ahmad LA, Crandall JP. Type 2 diabetes prevention: a review. Clin Diab. 2010;28:53–9.CrossRef Ahmad LA, Crandall JP. Type 2 diabetes prevention: a review. Clin Diab. 2010;28:53–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Johnson M, Jones R, Freeman C, Woods HB, Gillett M, Goyder E, et al. Can diabetes prevention programmes be translated effectively into real-world settings and still deliver improved outcomes? A synthesis of evidence. Diab Med. 2013;30:3–15.CrossRef Johnson M, Jones R, Freeman C, Woods HB, Gillett M, Goyder E, et al. Can diabetes prevention programmes be translated effectively into real-world settings and still deliver improved outcomes? A synthesis of evidence. Diab Med. 2013;30:3–15.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lindström J, Neumann A, Sheppard KE, Gilis-Januszewska A, Greaves CJ, Handke U, et al. Take action to prevent diabetes – the IMAGE toolkit for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Europe. Horm Metab Res. 2010;42(S1):S37–55.CrossRefPubMed Lindström J, Neumann A, Sheppard KE, Gilis-Januszewska A, Greaves CJ, Handke U, et al. Take action to prevent diabetes – the IMAGE toolkit for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Europe. Horm Metab Res. 2010;42(S1):S37–55.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Paulweber B, Valensi P, Lindström J, Lallic NM, Greaves CJ, McKee M, et al. A European evidence-based guideline for the prevention of type 2 diabetes – IMAGE-Guideline for diabetes prevention. Horm Metab Res. 2010;42(S1):S3–36.CrossRefPubMed Paulweber B, Valensi P, Lindström J, Lallic NM, Greaves CJ, McKee M, et al. A European evidence-based guideline for the prevention of type 2 diabetes – IMAGE-Guideline for diabetes prevention. Horm Metab Res. 2010;42(S1):S3–36.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rose EA, Parfitt G. A quantitative and qualitative explanation of the individual differences in affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities. J Sport Exer Psych. 2007;29:281–309. Rose EA, Parfitt G. A quantitative and qualitative explanation of the individual differences in affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities. J Sport Exer Psych. 2007;29:281–309.
13.
go back to reference Rose EA, Parfitt G. Exercise experience influences affective and motivational outcomes of prescribed and self-selected intensity exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22:265–77.CrossRefPubMed Rose EA, Parfitt G. Exercise experience influences affective and motivational outcomes of prescribed and self-selected intensity exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22:265–77.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ekkekakis P. Let them roam free? Physiological and psychological evidence for the potential of self-selected exercise intensity in public health. Sports Med. 2009;39:857–88.CrossRefPubMed Ekkekakis P. Let them roam free? Physiological and psychological evidence for the potential of self-selected exercise intensity in public health. Sports Med. 2009;39:857–88.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Ciccolo JT. Acute affective response to moderate – intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9:231–45.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Ciccolo JT. Acute affective response to moderate – intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9:231–45.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland DA, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. J Beh Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78.CrossRef Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland DA, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. J Beh Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lind E, Vazou S, Ekkekakis P. The affective impact of exercise intensity that slightly exceeds the preferred level: ‘pain’ for no added ‘gain’. J Health Psychol. 2008;13:464–8.CrossRefPubMed Lind E, Vazou S, Ekkekakis P. The affective impact of exercise intensity that slightly exceeds the preferred level: ‘pain’ for no added ‘gain’. J Health Psychol. 2008;13:464–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Parfitt G, Rose EA, Burgess WM. The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribed and preferred intensity exercise. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11:39–53.CrossRefPubMed Parfitt G, Rose EA, Burgess WM. The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribed and preferred intensity exercise. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11:39–53.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Norris SL, Zhang X, Avenell A, Gregg E, Bowman B, Schmid CH, et al. Long-term effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in adults with pre-diabetes: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:126–39.CrossRefPubMed Norris SL, Zhang X, Avenell A, Gregg E, Bowman B, Schmid CH, et al. Long-term effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in adults with pre-diabetes: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:126–39.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Norris SL, Zhang X, Avenell A, Gregg E, Schmid CH, Lau J. Long-term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with prediabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD005270.PubMed Norris SL, Zhang X, Avenell A, Gregg E, Schmid CH, Lau J. Long-term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with prediabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2:CD005270.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Metz JA, Kris-Etherton PM, Morris CD, Mustad VA, Stern JS, Oparil S, et al. Dietary compliance and cardiovascular risk reduction with a prepared meal plan compared with a self-selected diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:373–85.PubMed Metz JA, Kris-Etherton PM, Morris CD, Mustad VA, Stern JS, Oparil S, et al. Dietary compliance and cardiovascular risk reduction with a prepared meal plan compared with a self-selected diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:373–85.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Delamater A. Improving patient adherence. Clin Diab. 2006;24:271–7. Delamater A. Improving patient adherence. Clin Diab. 2006;24:271–7.
23.
go back to reference Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, Hardeman W, Roden M, Evans PH, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Pub Health. 2011;11:119.CrossRef Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, Hardeman W, Roden M, Evans PH, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Pub Health. 2011;11:119.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabet. 1985;28:412-19. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabet. 1985;28:412-19.
26.
go back to reference Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diab Care. 1999;22:1462–70.CrossRef Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diab Care. 1999;22:1462–70.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An evaluation of the DEXLIFE ‘self-selected’ lifestyle intervention aimed at improving insulin sensitivity in people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Grainne M. O’Donoghue
Aileen Kennedy
Gregers Stig Andersen
Eoin Durkan
Tanja Thybo
Margaret Sinnott
John J. Nolan
Donal J. O’Gorman
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1042-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue