Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Helen Rodgers, Lisa Shaw, Robin Cant, Avril Drummond, Gary A Ford, Anne Forster, Katie Hills, Denise Howel, Anne-Marie Laverty, Christopher McKevitt, Peter McMeekin, Christopher Price

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Development of longer term stroke rehabilitation services is limited by lack of evidence of effectiveness for specific interventions and service models. We describe the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial which is evaluating an extended stroke rehabilitation service. The extended service commences when routine ‘organised stroke care’ (stroke unit and early supported discharge (ESD)) ends.

Methods/design

This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with health economic and process evaluations. It is set within NHS stroke services which provide ESD. Participants are adults who have experienced a new stroke (and carer if appropriate), discharged from hospital under the care of an ESD team.
The intervention group receives an extended stroke rehabilitation service provided for 18 months following completion of ESD. The extended rehabilitation service involves regular contact with a senior ESD team member who leads and coordinates further rehabilitation. Contact is usually by telephone. The control group receives usual stroke care post-ESD. Usual care may involve referral of patients to a range of rehabilitation services upon completion of ESD in accordance with local clinical practice. Randomisation is via a central independent web-based service.
The primary outcome is extended activities of daily living (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale) at 24 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes (at 12 and 24 months post-randomisation) are health status, quality of life, mood and experience of services for patients, and quality of life, experience of services and carer stress for carers. Resource use and adverse events are also collected. Outcomes are undertaken by a blinded assessor.
Implementation and delivery of the extended stroke rehabilitation service will also be described. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subsample of participants and staff to gain insight into perceptions and experiences of rehabilitation services delivered or received.
Allowing for 25% attrition, 510 participants are needed to provide 90% power to detect a difference in mean Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale score of 6 with a 5% significance level.

Discussion

The provision of longer term support for stroke survivors is currently limited. The results from this trial will inform future stroke service planning and configuration.

Trial registration

This trial was registered with ISRCTN (identifier: ISRCTN45203373) on 9 August 2012.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Audit Office. Reducing brain damage: faster access to better stroke care. London: National Audit Office; 2005. National Audit Office. Reducing brain damage: faster access to better stroke care. London: National Audit Office; 2005.
2.
go back to reference McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Wolfe C. UK stroke survivor needs survey. London: The Stroke Association; 2010. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Wolfe C. UK stroke survivor needs survey. London: The Stroke Association; 2010.
3.
go back to reference Early Supported Discharge Trialists. Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD000443. Early Supported Discharge Trialists. Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD000443.
4.
go back to reference Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD000197. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD000197.
5.
go back to reference Fisher R, Gaynor K, Kerr M, Langhorne P, Anderson C, Bautz-Holter E, et al. A consensus on stroke early supported discharge. Stroke. 2011;42:1392–7.CrossRefPubMed Fisher R, Gaynor K, Kerr M, Langhorne P, Anderson C, Bautz-Holter E, et al. A consensus on stroke early supported discharge. Stroke. 2011;42:1392–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
7.
go back to reference National Audit Office. Progress in improving stroke care. London: National Audit Office; 2010. National Audit Office. Progress in improving stroke care. London: National Audit Office; 2010.
8.
go back to reference Aziz NA, Leonardi-Bee J, Phillips M, Gladman JRF, Legg L, Walker MF: Therapy-based rehabilitation services for patients living at home more than one year after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD005952. Aziz NA, Leonardi-Bee J, Phillips M, Gladman JRF, Legg L, Walker MF: Therapy-based rehabilitation services for patients living at home more than one year after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD005952.
9.
go back to reference Outpatient Service Trialists. Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:CD002925. Outpatient Service Trialists. Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:CD002925.
10.
go back to reference Department of Health. National stroke strategy. London: Department of Health; 2007. Department of Health. National stroke strategy. London: Department of Health; 2007.
11.
go back to reference Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:301–5.CrossRef Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:301–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Warlow CP, Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989;20:828.CrossRefPubMed Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Warlow CP, Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989;20:828.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Brott T, Adams Jr HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–70.CrossRefPubMed Brott T, Adams Jr HP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–70.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, editor. Measuring mental health needs. 2nd ed. London: Gaskel; 2001. Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, editor. Measuring mental health needs. 2nd ed. London: Gaskel; 2001.
16.
go back to reference Forster A, Dickerson J, Young J, Patel A, Kalra L, Nixon J, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a structured training programme for caregivers of inpatients after stroke: the TRACS trial. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forster A, Dickerson J, Young J, Patel A, Kalra L, Nixon J, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a structured training programme for caregivers of inpatients after stroke: the TRACS trial. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1–216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing. 1972;1:233–8.CrossRefPubMed Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing. 1972;1:233–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Al-Khawaja I, Wade DT, Collin CF. Bedside screening for aphasia: a comparison of two methods. J Neurol. 1996;243:201–4.CrossRefPubMed Al-Khawaja I, Wade DT, Collin CF. Bedside screening for aphasia: a comparison of two methods. J Neurol. 1996;243:201–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Williams A. The EuroQol instrument. In: Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R, editors. EQ-5D concepts and methods. The Netherlands: Springer; 2005. Williams A. The EuroQol instrument. In: Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R, editors. EQ-5D concepts and methods. The Netherlands: Springer; 2005.
20.
go back to reference Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefPubMed Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. Care after stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Information for patients and their carers. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. Care after stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Information for patients and their carers. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
23.
go back to reference Robinson L, Iliffe S, Brayne C, Goodman C, Rait G, Manthorpe J, et al. Primary care and dementia: 2. long term care at home: psychological interventions, information provision, carer support and case management. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2010;25:657–64.CrossRef Robinson L, Iliffe S, Brayne C, Goodman C, Rait G, Manthorpe J, et al. Primary care and dementia: 2. long term care at home: psychological interventions, information provision, carer support and case management. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2010;25:657–64.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M. Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:756–72.CrossRefPubMed Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M. Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:756–72.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Drummond AE, Dewey ME, Lincoln NB, Barer D, et al. A multicentre randomized controlled trial of leisure therapy and conventional occupational therapy after stroke. TOTAL study group. Trial of occupational therapy and leisure. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:42–52.CrossRefPubMed Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Drummond AE, Dewey ME, Lincoln NB, Barer D, et al. A multicentre randomized controlled trial of leisure therapy and conventional occupational therapy after stroke. TOTAL study group. Trial of occupational therapy and leisure. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:42–52.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Methods for the economic evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Methods for the economic evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
27.
go back to reference Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:1339–41.CrossRefPubMed Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:1339–41.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Fenwick E, Byford S. A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:106–8.CrossRefPubMed Fenwick E, Byford S. A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:106–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2007. Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2007.
30.
go back to reference Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T, Gold L. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:788–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T, Gold L. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:788–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: Medical Research Council; 2008. Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: Medical Research Council; 2008.
32.
go back to reference McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2004;35:1499–505.CrossRefPubMed McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2004;35:1499–505.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Mold F, Wolfe C, McKevitt C. Falling through the net of stroke care. Health Soc Care Community. 2006;14:349–56.CrossRefPubMed Mold F, Wolfe C, McKevitt C. Falling through the net of stroke care. Health Soc Care Community. 2006;14:349–56.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Murray J, Ashworth R, Forster A, Young J. Developing a primary care-based stroke service: a review of the qualitative literature. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:137–42.PubMedPubMedCentral Murray J, Ashworth R, Forster A, Young J. Developing a primary care-based stroke service: a review of the qualitative literature. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:137–42.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Social and practical strategies described by people living at home with stroke. Health Soc Care Community. 1999;7:120–8.CrossRefPubMed Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Social and practical strategies described by people living at home with stroke. Health Soc Care Community. 1999;7:120–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage Publications; 2004. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage Publications; 2004.
37.
go back to reference Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, Silverman D. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications; 2004.CrossRef Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, Silverman D. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications; 2004.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Silverman D. Validity and credibility in qualitative research. In: Miller G, Dingwall R, editors. Context and method in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications; 1997. Silverman D. Validity and credibility in qualitative research. In: Miller G, Dingwall R, editors. Context and method in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
39.
go back to reference Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. 2nd ed. London: Department of Health; 2005. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. 2nd ed. London: Department of Health; 2005.
Metadata
Title
Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Helen Rodgers
Lisa Shaw
Robin Cant
Avril Drummond
Gary A Ford
Anne Forster
Katie Hills
Denise Howel
Anne-Marie Laverty
Christopher McKevitt
Peter McMeekin
Christopher Price
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0704-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue