Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Breast Cancer | Research article

Landscape of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results from the Austrian AGMT_MBC-Registry

Authors: Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Christoph Tinchon, Andreas Petzer, Marija Balic, Sonja Heibl, Clemens Schmitt, August Felix Zabernigg, Daniel Egle, Margit Sandholzer, Christian Fridolin Singer, Florian Roitner, Christopher Hager, Johannes Andel, Michael Hubalek, Michael Knauer, Richard Greil

Published in: Breast Cancer Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

About 50% of all primary breast cancers show a low-level expression of HER2 (HER2-low), defined as immunohistochemically 1+ or 2+ and lack of HER2 gene amplification measured by in situ hybridization. This low HER2 expression is a promising new target for antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) currently under investigation. Until now, little is known about the frequency and the prognostic value of low HER2-expression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and methods

The MBC-Registry of the Austrian Study Group of Medical Tumor Therapy (AGMT) is a multicenter nationwide ongoing registry for MBC patients in Austria. Unadjusted, univariate survival probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios were estimated by Cox regression models. In this analysis, only patients with known HER2 status and available survival data were included.

Results

As of 11/15/2020, 1,973 patients were included in the AGMT-MBC-Registry. Out of 1,729 evaluable patients, 351 (20.3%) were HER2-positive, 608 (35.2%) were HER2-low and 770 (44.5%) were completely HER2-negative (HER2-0). Low HER2-expression was markedly more frequent in the hormone-receptor(HR)+ subgroup compared to the triple-negative subgroup (40% vs. 23%). In multivariable analysis, low HER2 expression did not significantly influence OS neither in the HR+ (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.74–1.05; P = 0.171) nor in the triple-negative subgroup (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.68–1.25; P = 0.585), when compared to completely HER2-negative disease. Similar results were observed when HER2 IHC 2+ patients were compared to IHC 1+ or 0 patients.

Conclusion

Low-HER2 expression did not have any impact on prognosis of metastatic breast cancer in this real-world population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hwang KT, et al. Impact of breast cancer subtypes on prognosis of women with operable invasive breast cancer: a population-based study using SEER database. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(6):1970–9.PubMed Hwang KT, et al. Impact of breast cancer subtypes on prognosis of women with operable invasive breast cancer: a population-based study using SEER database. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(6):1970–9.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kobayashi K, et al. Impact of immunohistological subtypes on the long-term prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Surg Today. 2016;46(7):821–6.CrossRef Kobayashi K, et al. Impact of immunohistological subtypes on the long-term prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Surg Today. 2016;46(7):821–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wolff AC, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(20):2105–22.CrossRef Wolff AC, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(20):2105–22.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schalper KA, et al. A retrospective population-based comparison of HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinomas: impact of 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(2):213–9.CrossRef Schalper KA, et al. A retrospective population-based comparison of HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinomas: impact of 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(2):213–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fehrenbacher L, et al. NSABP B-47/NRG Oncology phase III randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in high-risk invasive breast cancer negative for HER2 by FISH and with IHC 1+ or 2. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(5):444–53.CrossRef Fehrenbacher L, et al. NSABP B-47/NRG Oncology phase III randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in high-risk invasive breast cancer negative for HER2 by FISH and with IHC 1+ or 2. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(5):444–53.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ogitani Y, et al. DS-8201a, a novel HER2-targeting ADC with a novel DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, demonstrates a promising antitumor efficacy with differentiation from T-DM1. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(20):5097–108.CrossRef Ogitani Y, et al. DS-8201a, a novel HER2-targeting ADC with a novel DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, demonstrates a promising antitumor efficacy with differentiation from T-DM1. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(20):5097–108.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Domenyuk V, et al. Poly-ligand profiling differentiates trastuzumab-treated breast cancer patients according to their outcomes. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1219.CrossRef Domenyuk V, et al. Poly-ligand profiling differentiates trastuzumab-treated breast cancer patients according to their outcomes. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1219.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Staudacher AH, Brown MP. Antibody drug conjugates and bystander killing: is antigen-dependent internalisation required? Br J Cancer. 2017;117(12):1736–42.CrossRef Staudacher AH, Brown MP. Antibody drug conjugates and bystander killing: is antigen-dependent internalisation required? Br J Cancer. 2017;117(12):1736–42.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beck A, et al. Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(5):315–37.CrossRef Beck A, et al. Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(5):315–37.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Modi S, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low-expressing advanced breast cancer: results from a phase Ib study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1887–96.CrossRef Modi S, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low-expressing advanced breast cancer: results from a phase Ib study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1887–96.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Banerji U, et al. Trastuzumab duocarmazine in locally advanced and metastatic solid tumours and HER2-expressing breast cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(8):1124–35.CrossRef Banerji U, et al. Trastuzumab duocarmazine in locally advanced and metastatic solid tumours and HER2-expressing breast cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(8):1124–35.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tarantino P, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: pathological and clinical landscape. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1951–62.CrossRef Tarantino P, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: pathological and clinical landscape. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1951–62.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Birner P, et al. Evaluation of the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring and test system of HER-2 protein expression in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(6):1669–75.PubMed Birner P, et al. Evaluation of the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring and test system of HER-2 protein expression in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(6):1669–75.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Camp RL, et al. Quantitative analysis of breast cancer tissue microarrays shows that both high and normal levels of HER2 expression are associated with poor outcome. Cancer Res. 2003;63(7):1445–8.PubMed Camp RL, et al. Quantitative analysis of breast cancer tissue microarrays shows that both high and normal levels of HER2 expression are associated with poor outcome. Cancer Res. 2003;63(7):1445–8.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Eggemann H, et al. Moderate HER2 expression as a prognostic factor in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(5):725–33.CrossRef Eggemann H, et al. Moderate HER2 expression as a prognostic factor in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(5):725–33.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gilcrease MZ, et al. Even low-level HER2 expression may be associated with worse outcome in node-positive breast cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(5):759–67.CrossRef Gilcrease MZ, et al. Even low-level HER2 expression may be associated with worse outcome in node-positive breast cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(5):759–67.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ménard S, et al. Biology, prognosis and response to therapy of breast carcinomas according to HER2 score. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(10):1706–12.CrossRef Ménard S, et al. Biology, prognosis and response to therapy of breast carcinomas according to HER2 score. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(10):1706–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rossi V, et al. Moderate immunohistochemical expression of HER-2 (2+) without HER-2 gene amplification is a negative prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17(11):1418–25.CrossRef Rossi V, et al. Moderate immunohistochemical expression of HER-2 (2+) without HER-2 gene amplification is a negative prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17(11):1418–25.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kim MH, et al. Intermediate HER2 expression is associated with poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;179(3):687–97.CrossRef Kim MH, et al. Intermediate HER2 expression is associated with poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;179(3):687–97.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hein A, et al. Prognostic effect of low-level HER2 expression in patients with clinically negative HER2 status. Eur J Cancer. 2021;155:1–12.CrossRef Hein A, et al. Prognostic effect of low-level HER2 expression in patients with clinically negative HER2 status. Eur J Cancer. 2021;155:1–12.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schettini F, et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1):1.CrossRef Schettini F, et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1):1.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Paul MR, et al. Genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer identifies preferentially dysregulated pathways and targets. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(8):4252–65.PubMedPubMedCentral Paul MR, et al. Genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer identifies preferentially dysregulated pathways and targets. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(8):4252–65.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Bozovic-Spasojevic I, et al. The prognostic role of androgen receptor in patients with early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and gene expression data. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):2702–12.CrossRef Bozovic-Spasojevic I, et al. The prognostic role of androgen receptor in patients with early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and gene expression data. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):2702–12.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bronte G, et al. Androgen receptor in advanced breast cancer: is it useful to predict the efficacy of anti-estrogen therapy? BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):348.CrossRef Bronte G, et al. Androgen receptor in advanced breast cancer: is it useful to predict the efficacy of anti-estrogen therapy? BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):348.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Thomson TA, et al. HER-2/neu in breast cancer: interobserver variability and performance of immunohistochemistry with 4 antibodies compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(11):1079–86.CrossRef Thomson TA, et al. HER-2/neu in breast cancer: interobserver variability and performance of immunohistochemistry with 4 antibodies compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(11):1079–86.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Landscape of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results from the Austrian AGMT_MBC-Registry
Authors
Simon Peter Gampenrieder
Gabriel Rinnerthaler
Christoph Tinchon
Andreas Petzer
Marija Balic
Sonja Heibl
Clemens Schmitt
August Felix Zabernigg
Daniel Egle
Margit Sandholzer
Christian Fridolin Singer
Florian Roitner
Christopher Hager
Johannes Andel
Michael Hubalek
Michael Knauer
Richard Greil
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Breast Cancer Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-021-01492-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Breast Cancer Research 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine