Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research Article

Breast Tissue Organisation and its Association with Breast Cancer Risk

Authors: Maya Alsheh Ali, Kamila Czene, Louise Eriksson, Per Hall, Keith Humphreys

Published in: Breast Cancer Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mammographic percentage density is an established and important risk factor for breast cancer. In this paper, we investigate the role of the spatial organisation of (dense vs. fatty) regions of the breast defined from mammographic images in terms of breast cancer risk.

Methods

We present a novel approach that provides a thorough description of the spatial organisation of different types of tissue in the breast. Each mammogram is first segmented into four regions (fatty, semi-fatty, semi-dense and dense tissue). The spatial relations between each pair of regions is described using so-called forces histograms (FHs) and summarised using functional principal component analysis. In our main analysis, association with case–control status is assessed using a Swedish population-based case–control study (1,170 cases and 1283 controls), for which digitised mammograms were available. We also carried out a small validation study based on digital images.

Results

For our main analysis, we obtained a global p value of 2×10−7 indicating a significant association between the spatial relations of the four segmented regions and breast cancer status after adjustment for percentage density and other important breast cancer risk factors. Our (spatial relations) score had a per standard deviation odds ratio 1.29, after accounting for overfitting (percentage density had a per standard deviation odds ratio of 1.34). The spatial relations between the fatty and semi-fatty tissue and the spatial relations between the fatty and dense tissue were the most significant. The spatial relations between the fatty and semi-fatty tissue were associated with parity and age at first birth (p=6×10−4). Using digital images, we were able to verify that the same characteristics of tissue organisation can be identified and we validated the association for the spatial relations between the fatty and semi-fatty tissue.

Conclusions

Our findings are consistent with the notion that fibroglandular and adipose tissue plays a role in breast cancer risk and, more specifically, they suggest that fatty tissue in the lower quadrants and the absence of density in the retromammary space, as shown in mediolateral oblique images, are protective against breast cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al.Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(3):227–36.CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al.Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(3):227–36.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lokate M, Peeters PH, Peelen LM, Haars G, Veldhuis WrB, van Gils CH. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: the role of the fat surrounding the fibroglandular tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13(5):1–8.CrossRef Lokate M, Peeters PH, Peelen LM, Haars G, Veldhuis WrB, van Gils CH. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: the role of the fat surrounding the fibroglandular tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13(5):1–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pettersson A, Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Tamimi RM. Nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13(5):1–10.CrossRef Pettersson A, Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Tamimi RM. Nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13(5):1–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Duewer F, Fan B, Wang J, et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20(7):1473–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Duewer F, Fan B, Wang J, et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20(7):1473–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Keller BM, Conant EF, Oh H, Kontos D. Breast cancer risk prediction via area and volumetric estimates of breast density. In: Breast imaging: 11th International Workshop. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2012. p. 236–43. Keller BM, Conant EF, Oh H, Kontos D. Breast cancer risk prediction via area and volumetric estimates of breast density. In: Breast imaging: 11th International Workshop. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2012. p. 236–43.
6.
go back to reference Nielsen M, Vachon CM, Scott CG, Chernoff K, Karemore G, Karssemeijer N, et al. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014; 16:R37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nielsen M, Vachon CM, Scott CG, Chernoff K, Karemore G, Karssemeijer N, et al. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014; 16:R37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Haberle L, Wagner F, Fasching PA, Jud SM, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, et al. Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features. Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14(2):R59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haberle L, Wagner F, Fasching PA, Jud SM, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, et al. Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features. Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14(2):R59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Wei J, Chan HP, Wu YT, Zhou C, Helvie MA, Tsodikov A, et al. Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case–control study. Radiology. 2011; 260(1):42–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wei J, Chan HP, Wu YT, Zhou C, Helvie MA, Tsodikov A, et al. Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case–control study. Radiology. 2011; 260(1):42–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Manduca A, Carston MJ, Heine JJ, Scott CG, Pankratz VS, Brandt KR, et al. Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18(3):837–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Manduca A, Carston MJ, Heine JJ, Scott CG, Pankratz VS, Brandt KR, et al. Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18(3):837–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Pereira SMP, McCormack VA, Moss SM, dos Santos Silva I. The spatial distribution of radiodense breast tissue: a longitudinal study. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11(3):1–12. Pereira SMP, McCormack VA, Moss SM, dos Santos Silva I. The spatial distribution of radiodense breast tissue: a longitudinal study. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11(3):1–12.
11.
go back to reference Matsakis P. Understanding the spatial organization of image regions by means of force histograms: a guided tour In: Matsakis S, editor. Applying soft computing in defining spatial relations. Heidelberg: Springer. Physica-Verlag: 2002. p. 99–122.CrossRef Matsakis P. Understanding the spatial organization of image regions by means of force histograms: a guided tour In: Matsakis S, editor. Applying soft computing in defining spatial relations. Heidelberg: Springer. Physica-Verlag: 2002. p. 99–122.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shyu CR, Matsakis P. Spatial lesion indexing for medical image databases using force histograms. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition IEEE, vol. 2. IEEE: 2001. p. 603–608. Shyu CR, Matsakis P. Spatial lesion indexing for medical image databases using force histograms. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition IEEE, vol. 2. IEEE: 2001. p. 603–608.
13.
go back to reference Garnier M, Alsheh Ali M, Seguin J, Mignet N, Hurtut T, Wendling L. Grading cancer from liver histology images using inter and intra region spatial relations. In: International conference image analysis and recognition. Portugal: Springer: 2014. p. 247–254. Garnier M, Alsheh Ali M, Seguin J, Mignet N, Hurtut T, Wendling L. Grading cancer from liver histology images using inter and intra region spatial relations. In: International conference image analysis and recognition. Portugal: Springer: 2014. p. 247–254.
14.
go back to reference Alsheh Ali M, Garnier M, Humphreys K. Spatial relations of mammographic density regions and their association with breast cancer risk. Procedia Comput Sci. 2016; 90:169–74.CrossRef Alsheh Ali M, Garnier M, Humphreys K. Spatial relations of mammographic density regions and their association with breast cancer risk. Procedia Comput Sci. 2016; 90:169–74.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg L, Humphreys K, Hall P. The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(2):859–66.CrossRefPubMed Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg L, Humphreys K, Hall P. The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134(2):859–66.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gabrielson M, Eriksson M, Hammarström M, Borgquist S, Leifland K, Czene K, et al. Cohort profile: The Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA). Int J Epidemiol. 2017. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw357. Gabrielson M, Eriksson M, Hammarström M, Borgquist S, Leifland K, Czene K, et al. Cohort profile: The Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA). Int J Epidemiol. 2017. doi:10.​1093/​ije/​dyw357.
17.
go back to reference Bertrand KA, Tamimi RM, Scott CG, Jensen MR, Pankratz VS, Visscher D, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res. 2013; 15(6):R104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bertrand KA, Tamimi RM, Scott CG, Jensen MR, Pankratz VS, Visscher D, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res. 2013; 15(6):R104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, et al. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(2):418–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, et al. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(2):418–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Byng JW, Boyd N, Fishell E, Jong R, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994; 39(10):1629.CrossRefPubMed Byng JW, Boyd N, Fishell E, Jong R, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994; 39(10):1629.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cheddad A, Czene K, Eriksson Ml, Li J, Easton D, Hall P, et al. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer. PloS ONE. 2014; 9(10):e110690.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheddad A, Czene K, Eriksson Ml, Li J, Easton D, Hall P, et al. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer. PloS ONE. 2014; 9(10):e110690.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Bora VB, Kothari AG, Keskar AG. Robust automatic pectoral muscle segmentation from mammograms using texture gradient and Euclidean distance regression. J Digit Imaging. 2016; 29(1):115–25.CrossRefPubMed Bora VB, Kothari AG, Keskar AG. Robust automatic pectoral muscle segmentation from mammograms using texture gradient and Euclidean distance regression. J Digit Imaging. 2016; 29(1):115–25.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 1976; 126(6):1130–7.CrossRef Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 1976; 126(6):1130–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gong YC, Brady M, Petroudi S. Texture based mammogram classification and segmentation. In: Digital mammography: 8th International Workshop. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2006. p. 616–25. Gong YC, Brady M, Petroudi S. Texture based mammogram classification and segmentation. In: Digital mammography: 8th International Workshop. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2006. p. 616–25.
25.
go back to reference Shang HL. A survey of functional principal component analysis. AStA Adv Stat Anal. 2014; 98(2):121–42.CrossRef Shang HL. A survey of functional principal component analysis. AStA Adv Stat Anal. 2014; 98(2):121–42.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yao F, Müller HG, Wang JL. Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2005; 100(470):577–90.CrossRef Yao F, Müller HG, Wang JL. Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2005; 100(470):577–90.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Tutorial in biostatistics multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15:361–87.CrossRefPubMed Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Tutorial in biostatistics multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15:361–87.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM. Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44:837–45.CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, DeLong DM. Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44:837–45.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Jones MC, Rice JA. Displaying the important features of large collections of similar curves. Am Stat. 1992; 46(2):140–5. Jones MC, Rice JA. Displaying the important features of large collections of similar curves. Am Stat. 1992; 46(2):140–5.
Metadata
Title
Breast Tissue Organisation and its Association with Breast Cancer Risk
Authors
Maya Alsheh Ali
Kamila Czene
Louise Eriksson
Per Hall
Keith Humphreys
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Breast Cancer Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0894-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Breast Cancer Research 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine