Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Thrombosis | Research Letter

Machine learning to predict hemorrhage and thrombosis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Authors: Adeel Abbasi, Yasmin Karasu, Cindy Li, Neel R. Sodha, Carsten Eickhoff, Corey E. Ventetuolo

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Hemorrhage and thrombosis are major causes of morbidity and mortality during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Even in a controlled setting, bleeding occurs frequently—almost half (46%) of the patients randomized to ECMO in the EOLIA trial had hemorrhage requiring transfusion [1]. The pathophysiology of these complications during ECMO is complex, dynamic and not fully understood [2]. This may explain why standard approaches to monitor coagulation are imperfect and studies that employ traditional biostatistical methods do not consistently identify common risk factors. We applied machine learning to an ECMO dataset to predict hemorrhage and thrombosis. Our hypothesis was that machine learning would accurately predict these events and identify novel factors not anticipated clinically or identified by traditional biostatistical methods. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoue S, Guervilly C, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1965–75.CrossRef Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoue S, Guervilly C, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1965–75.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Annich GM. Extracorporeal life support: the precarious balance of hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13 Suppl 1:S336–42.CrossRef Annich GM. Extracorporeal life support: the precarious balance of hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13 Suppl 1:S336–42.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chu DC, Abu-Samra AG, Baird GL, Devers C, Sweeney J, Levy MM, et al. Quantitative measurement of heparin in comparison with conventional anticoagulation monitoring and the risk of thrombotic events in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(2):369–70.CrossRef Chu DC, Abu-Samra AG, Baird GL, Devers C, Sweeney J, Levy MM, et al. Quantitative measurement of heparin in comparison with conventional anticoagulation monitoring and the risk of thrombotic events in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(2):369–70.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM. Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(15):3301–7.CrossRef Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM. Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(15):3301–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fawcett C, Hoos HH. Analysing differences between algorithm configurations through ablation. J Heuristics. 2013;22:431–58.CrossRef Fawcett C, Hoos HH. Analysing differences between algorithm configurations through ablation. J Heuristics. 2013;22:431–58.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Machine learning to predict hemorrhage and thrombosis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Authors
Adeel Abbasi
Yasmin Karasu
Cindy Li
Neel R. Sodha
Carsten Eickhoff
Corey E. Ventetuolo
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03403-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Critical Care 1/2020 Go to the issue