Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Letter to the Editor

Arterial blood pressure differences between AutoPulse™ and Lucas2™during mechanic cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Authors: Manuel Frey, Stefan Lötscher, Lorenz Theiler, Roland Albrecht

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

We present a 39-year-old patient under constant mechanical CPR with an arterial line in place. The use of AutoPulse™ resulted in higher arterial pressures than the use of LUCAS2™.
Literature
1.
2.
Westfall M, Krantz S, Mullin C, Kaufman C. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;41(7):1782–9.CrossRef
3.
Halperin H, Paradis N, Ornato J, Zviman M, LaCorte J, Lardo A, Kern K. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;44(11):2214–20.CrossRef
4.
Timerman S, Cardoso L, Ramires J, Halperin H. Improved hemodynamic performance with a novel chest compression device during treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2004;61:273–80.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Li H, Wang D, Yu Y, Zhao X, Jing X. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Koga Y, Fujita M, Yagia T, Nakahara T, Miyauchi T, Kaneda K. Effects of mechanical chest compression device with a load-distributing band on post-resuscitation injuries identified by post-mortem computed tomography. Resuscitation. 2015;96:226–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation. 2015;95:1–80.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Arterial blood pressure differences between AutoPulse™ and Lucas2™during mechanic cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Authors
Manuel Frey
Stefan Lötscher
Lorenz Theiler
Roland Albrecht
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0253-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue

Original research

Elevations in growth hormone and glucagon-like peptide-2 levels on admission are associated with increased mortality in trauma patients

Original research

Obese motorcycle riders have a different injury pattern and longer hospital length of stay than the normal-weight patients

Original research

Heel pressure ulcer, prevention and predictors during the care delivery chain – when and where to take action? A descriptive and explorative study

Letter to the Editor

Mechanical chest compressions in the coronary catheterization laboratory – do not hesitate to go step further!

Original research

Predictors of early versus late mortality in pelvic trauma patients

Letter to the Editor

Possibly preventable cardiac arrest in a morbidly obese patient - a comment on the 2015 ERC guidelines