Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research

Routine whole body CT of high energy trauma patients leads to excessive radiation exposure

Authors: Fredrik Linder, Kevin Mani, Claes Juhlin, Hampus Eklöf

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Whole body computed tomography (WBCT) is an important adjunct in trauma care, which is often part of standard protocol in initial management of trauma patients. However, WBCT exposes patients to a significant dose of radiation. The use of WBCT was assessed in a modern trauma cohort in Sweden.

Methods

A two-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All consecutive trauma alert patients at a university hospital (July-December 2008), and a rural county hospital (January 2009- December 2010) were included. Patients were stratified into three groups (high, intermediate and low risk) based on documented suspected injuries at primary survey at the site of accident or at the emergency department. Injury severity score (ISS) was calculated. Case records were reviewed for clinical and radiological findings at the time of trauma, and during a ≥36 months of follow-up period to identify possible missed injuries.

Results

A total of 523 patients were included in the study (university hospital n = 273; rural county hospital n = 250), out of which 475 patients (91.0 %) underwent radiological examinations, 290 patients (55.4 %) underwent WBCT, which identified trauma related findings in 125 patients (43.1 % of those examined). The high-risk group (n = 62) had a mean age of 38.5 years (21.1 SD). Mean ISS was 16.48 (18.14 SD). In this group, WBCT resulted in a positive finding in 38 (74.5 %) patients. In the intermediate-risk group (n = 322; mean age 37.66, 20.24 SD) ISS was 4.42 (6.30 SD). A positive finding on WBCT was found in 87 of the intermediate group patients (44.8 %). The low-risk group (n = 139; mean age 32.5 years; 21.4 SD) had a mean ISS of 0.84 (1.57 SD) with no positive findings on WBCT and no missed injuries in medical records at ≥36 months.

Discussion

The risk of developing radiation induced cancer is significant for young people if exposed to relatively high dose radiation as is the case in WBCT. WBCT in high-energy trauma is important for planning of treatment in severely injured patients while it can be questioned in the seemingly not injured where it is used mainly to permit early discharge from the ED.

Conclusions

Risk stratification criteria could in this retrospective study identify high energy trauma patients not in need of radiological imaging. WBCT in high-energy trauma does not affect patient care if the patient is mentally alert, not intoxicated nor shows signs of other than minor injuries when evaluated by a trauma-team. The risk of missing important traumatic findings in these patients is very low. Observation of the patient with reexamination instead of imaging may be considered in this group of often young patients where radiation dose is an issue.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons Comittee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support Student Course Manual. 2008. American College of Surgeons Comittee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support Student Course Manual. 2008.
3.
go back to reference Baker SP ONB, Haddon Jr W, Long WB. The Injury severity score - a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96.CrossRefPubMed Baker SP ONB, Haddon Jr W, Long WB. The Injury severity score - a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Leidner B, Adiels M, Aspelin P, Gullstrand P, Wallen S. Standardized CT examination of the multitraumatized patient. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1630–8.CrossRefPubMed Leidner B, Adiels M, Aspelin P, Gullstrand P, Wallen S. Standardized CT examination of the multitraumatized patient. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1630–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Leidner B, Adiels M, Aspelin P. [Computer tomography. Life-threatening injuries of the skull, thorax, abdomen and pelvis are diagnosed in 15 minutes]. Lakartidningen. 1994;91(12):1191. 4–6.PubMed Leidner B, Adiels M, Aspelin P. [Computer tomography. Life-threatening injuries of the skull, thorax, abdomen and pelvis are diagnosed in 15 minutes]. Lakartidningen. 1994;91(12):1191. 4–6.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hessmann MH, Hofmann A, Kreitner KF, Lott C, Rommens PM. The benefit of multislice CT in the emergency room management of polytraumatized patients. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106(5):500–7.PubMed Hessmann MH, Hofmann A, Kreitner KF, Lott C, Rommens PM. The benefit of multislice CT in the emergency room management of polytraumatized patients. Acta Chir Belg. 2006;106(5):500–7.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Laack TA, Thompson KM, Kofler JM, Bellolio MF, Sawyer MD, Laack NN. Comparison of trauma mortality and estimated cancer mortality from computed tomography during initial evaluation of intermediate-risk trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011;70(6):1362–5. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e1707f.CrossRefPubMed Laack TA, Thompson KM, Kofler JM, Bellolio MF, Sawyer MD, Laack NN. Comparison of trauma mortality and estimated cancer mortality from computed tomography during initial evaluation of intermediate-risk trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011;70(6):1362–5. doi:10.​1097/​TA.​0b013e3181e1707f​.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Corwin MT, Sheen L, Kuramoto A, Lamba R, Parthasarathy S, Holmes JF. Utilization of a clinical prediction rule for abdominal-pelvic CT scans in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21(6):571–6. doi:10.1007/s10140-014-1233-1.CrossRefPubMed Corwin MT, Sheen L, Kuramoto A, Lamba R, Parthasarathy S, Holmes JF. Utilization of a clinical prediction rule for abdominal-pelvic CT scans in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21(6):571–6. doi:10.​1007/​s10140-014-1233-1.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mahoney E, Agarwal S, Li B, Dechert T, Abbensetts J, Glantz A, et al. Evidence-based guidelines are equivalent to a liberal computed tomography scan protocol for initial patient evaluation but are associated with decreased computed tomography scan use, cost, and radiation exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):573–8. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cb95. discussion 8–9.CrossRefPubMed Mahoney E, Agarwal S, Li B, Dechert T, Abbensetts J, Glantz A, et al. Evidence-based guidelines are equivalent to a liberal computed tomography scan protocol for initial patient evaluation but are associated with decreased computed tomography scan use, cost, and radiation exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):573–8. doi:10.​1097/​TA.​0b013e318265cb95​. discussion 8–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fantus RJ, Nance ML. NTDB data points: Annual Report 2014: How severe is it? Bull Am Coll Surg. 2015;100(1):61–2.PubMed Fantus RJ, Nance ML. NTDB data points: Annual Report 2014: How severe is it? Bull Am Coll Surg. 2015;100(1):61–2.PubMed
14.
go back to reference OECD. Road Safety Annual Report 2014. International Transport Forum: IRTAD Annual Report. Paris; 2014.CrossRef OECD. Road Safety Annual Report 2014. International Transport Forum: IRTAD Annual Report. Paris; 2014.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference WHO. Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. Luxembourg 2013. WHO. Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. Luxembourg 2013.
17.
go back to reference Anell A, Glenngard AH, Merkur S. Sweden health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1–159.PubMed Anell A, Glenngard AH, Merkur S. Sweden health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1–159.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Routine whole body CT of high energy trauma patients leads to excessive radiation exposure
Authors
Fredrik Linder
Kevin Mani
Claes Juhlin
Hampus Eklöf
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0199-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue