Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Ovarian Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Ovarian thecoma-fibroma groups: clinical and sonographic features with pathological comparison

Authors: Hui Chen, Yan Liu, Li-fei Shen, Mei-jiao Jiang, Zhi-fang Yang, Guo-ping Fang

Published in: Journal of Ovarian Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ovarian thecoma-fibroma groups (OTFG) are uncommon sex cord-stromal neoplasms. The objective of the study was to demonstrate clinical and sonographic features of OTFG and compare with surgical histopathology.

Methods

A total of 61 patients with surgically proven OTFG were enrolled in this retrospective study to demonstrate its clinical and sonographic features and to compare with pathological findings. Gray scale and color Doppler sonography were performed presurgically with either transabdominal or transvaginal approach to image pelvic structures and lesions. The clinical findings and sonographic appearances were compared with the types of the OTFG tumors based on the histopathological diagnosis.

Results

The mean patient age was 53.57 (range, 26–86) years. There were 63.93% (39/61) patients in postmenopausal and 63.93% (39/61) patients with no clinical symptoms. Ultrasound findings of OTFG revealed as solid tumors with a typical feature of well-demarcated hypoechoic masses in 70.49% (43/61), among which 74.41% (32/43) tumors were smaller than 5 cm in diameter. There were 17 mixed echogenic masses with calcification, hemorrhage, or cyst, among which 70.59% (12/17) lesions were larger than 5 cm in diameter. Acoustic attenuation of the tumor was presented in 44.26% (27/61) of the cases. Doppler flow signals within the tumors were found in 20 cases (32.79%), in which 80% (16/20) had minimal or moderate flow signals. Ascites was detected in 32.79% (20/61) of the cases, Megi’s syndrome was found in 1 case. Final pathology revealed 41 (67.21%) thecoma-fibromas, 15 (24.59%) fibromas, 4 (6.56%) thecomas and 1 (1.64%) fibrosarcoma. There were 58 patients underwent cancer antigen 125 (CA125) test, and 20.69% (12/58) showed an elevated level. The diameter of tumors was found to be significantly correlated with CA125 level (p < 0.01) and the amount of ascites fluid (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The typical sonographic features of OTFG include adnexal hypoechoic masses with clear border and acoustic attenuation as well as minimal Doppler flow signals. All the aforementioned features could make ultrasound imaging as a assistent tool improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Numanoglu C, Kuru O, Sakinci M, Akbayir O, Ulker V. Ovarian fibroma/fibrothecoma: retrospective cohort study shows limited value of risk of malignancy index score. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(3):287–92.CrossRefPubMed Numanoglu C, Kuru O, Sakinci M, Akbayir O, Ulker V. Ovarian fibroma/fibrothecoma: retrospective cohort study shows limited value of risk of malignancy index score. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(3):287–92.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Athey PA, Malone RS. Sonography of ovarian fibromas/thecomas. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6(8):431–6.PubMed Athey PA, Malone RS. Sonography of ovarian fibromas/thecomas. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6(8):431–6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sivanesaratnam V, Dutta R, Jayalakshmi P. Ovarian fibroma--clinical and histopathological characteristics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;33(3):243–7.CrossRefPubMed Sivanesaratnam V, Dutta R, Jayalakshmi P. Ovarian fibroma--clinical and histopathological characteristics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;33(3):243–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Foti PV, Attina G, Spadola S, Caltabiano R, Farina R, Palmucci S, Zarbo G, Zarbo R, D'Arrigo M, Milone P, et al. MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(1):21–41.CrossRefPubMed Foti PV, Attina G, Spadola S, Caltabiano R, Farina R, Palmucci S, Zarbo G, Zarbo R, D'Arrigo M, Milone P, et al. MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(1):21–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Paladini D, Testa A, Van Holsbeke C, Mancari R, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Imaging in gynecological disease (5): clinical and ultrasound characteristics in fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(2):188–95.CrossRefPubMed Paladini D, Testa A, Van Holsbeke C, Mancari R, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Imaging in gynecological disease (5): clinical and ultrasound characteristics in fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(2):188–95.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Genc M, Solak A, Genc B, Sivrikoz ON, Kurtulmus S, Turan A, Sahin N, Gur EB. A diagnostic dilemma for solid ovarian masses: the clinical and radiological aspects with differential diagnosis of 23 cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015;36(2):186–91.PubMed Genc M, Solak A, Genc B, Sivrikoz ON, Kurtulmus S, Turan A, Sahin N, Gur EB. A diagnostic dilemma for solid ovarian masses: the clinical and radiological aspects with differential diagnosis of 23 cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015;36(2):186–91.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Brown DL, Dudiak KM, Laing FC. Adnexal masses: US characterization and reporting. Radiology. 2010;254(2):342–54.CrossRefPubMed Brown DL, Dudiak KM, Laing FC. Adnexal masses: US characterization and reporting. Radiology. 2010;254(2):342–54.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Sugimura K. Usual and unusual MRI findings of ovarian fibroma: correlation with pathologic findings. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(1):43–8.CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Sugimura K. Usual and unusual MRI findings of ovarian fibroma: correlation with pathologic findings. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(1):43–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chechia A, Attia L, Temime RB, Makhlouf T, Koubaa A. Incidence, clinical analysis, and management of ovarian fibromas and fibrothecomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(5):23.CrossRef Chechia A, Attia L, Temime RB, Makhlouf T, Koubaa A. Incidence, clinical analysis, and management of ovarian fibromas and fibrothecomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(5):23.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li X, Zhang W, Zhu G, Sun C, Liu Q, Shen Y. Imaging features and pathologic characteristics of ovarian thecoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36(1):46–53.CrossRefPubMed Li X, Zhang W, Zhu G, Sun C, Liu Q, Shen Y. Imaging features and pathologic characteristics of ovarian thecoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36(1):46–53.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Wu Y, Gao J. CT diagnosis in the thecoma-fibroma group of the ovarian stromal tumors. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;71(2):937–43.CrossRefPubMed Zhang Z, Wu Y, Gao J. CT diagnosis in the thecoma-fibroma group of the ovarian stromal tumors. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;71(2):937–43.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zhang H, Zhang GF, Wang TP. Value of 3.0T diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating thecoma and fibrothecoma from other adnexal solid masses. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6(1):1757–2215. Zhang H, Zhang GF, Wang TP. Value of 3.0T diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating thecoma and fibrothecoma from other adnexal solid masses. J Ovarian Res. 2013;6(1):1757–2215.
13.
go back to reference Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(5):500–5.CrossRefPubMed Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(5):500–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Burandt E, Young RH. Thecoma of the ovary: a report of 70 cases emphasizing aspects of its histopathology different from those often portrayed and its differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(8):1023–32.PubMed Burandt E, Young RH. Thecoma of the ovary: a report of 70 cases emphasizing aspects of its histopathology different from those often portrayed and its differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(8):1023–32.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Talerman A, Dunton C. Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7(3):465–71.CrossRefPubMed Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Talerman A, Dunton C. Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7(3):465–71.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yen P, Khong K, Lamba R, Corwin MT, Gerscovich EO. Ovarian fibromas and fibrothecomas: sonographic correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a 5-year single-institution experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(1):13–8.PubMed Yen P, Khong K, Lamba R, Corwin MT, Gerscovich EO. Ovarian fibromas and fibrothecomas: sonographic correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a 5-year single-institution experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(1):13–8.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Abad A, Cazorla E, Ruiz F, Aznar I, Asins E, Llixiona J. Meigs' syndrome with elevated CA125: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;82(1):97–9.CrossRefPubMed Abad A, Cazorla E, Ruiz F, Aznar I, Asins E, Llixiona J. Meigs' syndrome with elevated CA125: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;82(1):97–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chung BM, Park SB, Lee JB, Park HJ, Kim YS, Oh YJ. Magnetic resonance imaging features of ovarian fibroma, fibrothecoma, and thecoma. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(5):1263–72.CrossRefPubMed Chung BM, Park SB, Lee JB, Park HJ, Kim YS, Oh YJ. Magnetic resonance imaging features of ovarian fibroma, fibrothecoma, and thecoma. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(5):1263–72.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Conte M, Guariglia L, Benedetti Panici P, Scambia G, Rabitti C, Capelli A, Mancuso S. Ovarian fibrothecoma: sonographic and histologic findings. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;32(1):51–4.CrossRefPubMed Conte M, Guariglia L, Benedetti Panici P, Scambia G, Rabitti C, Capelli A, Mancuso S. Ovarian fibrothecoma: sonographic and histologic findings. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;32(1):51–4.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF, Cosgrove DO, Gilja OH, Bachmann Nielsen M, Albrecht T, Barozzi L, Bertolotto M, Catalano O, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33(1):33–59.CrossRefPubMed Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF, Cosgrove DO, Gilja OH, Bachmann Nielsen M, Albrecht T, Barozzi L, Bertolotto M, Catalano O, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33(1):33–59.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zhang X-l, He X-q, Zheng R-q, Mao Y-j, Huang Z-p, Zheng Z-j, Huang D-m. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis of subseroas myoma and ovarian fibroma. Chin J Ultrasonogr. 2013;22(3):239–42. Zhang X-l, He X-q, Zheng R-q, Mao Y-j, Huang Z-p, Zheng Z-j, Huang D-m. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis of subseroas myoma and ovarian fibroma. Chin J Ultrasonogr. 2013;22(3):239–42.
22.
go back to reference Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S. Simple ultrasound‐based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):681–90.CrossRefPubMed Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S. Simple ultrasound‐based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):681–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8794–801.CrossRefPubMed Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8794–801.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ovarian thecoma-fibroma groups: clinical and sonographic features with pathological comparison
Authors
Hui Chen
Yan Liu
Li-fei Shen
Mei-jiao Jiang
Zhi-fang Yang
Guo-ping Fang
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Ovarian Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1757-2215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-016-0291-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Ovarian Research 1/2016 Go to the issue