Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Knowledge evaluation in dementia care networks: a mixed-methods analysis of knowledge evaluation strategies and the success of informing family caregivers about dementia support services

Authors: Steffen Heinrich, Franziska Laporte Uribe, Markus Wübbeler, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Martina Roes

Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In general, most people with dementia living in the community are served by family caregivers at home. A similar situation is found in Germany. One primary goal of dementia care networks is to provide information on support services available to these caregiving relatives of people with dementia via knowledge management. The evaluation of knowledge management tools and processes for dementia care networks is relevant to their performance in successfully achieving information goals. One goal of this paper was the analysis of knowledge evaluation in dementia care networks, including potential barriers and facilitators, across Germany within the DemNet-D study. Additionally, the impact of highly formalized and less formalized knowledge management performed in dementia care networks was analyzed relative to family caregivers’ feelings of being informed about dementia support services.

Methods

Qualitative data were collected through interviews with and semi-standardized questionnaires administered to key persons from 13 dementia care networks between 2013 and 2014. Quantitative data were collected using standardized questionnaires. A structured content analysis and a mixed-methods analysis were conducted.

Results

The analyses indicated that the development of knowledge goals is important for a systematic knowledge evaluation process. Feedback from family caregivers was found to be beneficial for the target-oriented evaluation of dementia care network services. Surveys and special conferences, such as quality circles, were used in certain networks to solicit this feedback. Limited resources can hinder the development of formalized knowledge evaluation processes. More formalized knowledge management processes in dementia care networks can lead to a higher level of knowledge among family caregivers.

Conclusions

The studied tools, processes and potential barriers related to knowledge evaluation contribute to the development and optimization of knowledge evaluation strategies for use in dementia care networks. Furthermore, the mixed-methods results indicate that highly formalized dementia care networks are especially successful in providing information to family members caring for people with dementia via knowledge management.
Literature
2.
go back to reference WHO WHO: Dementia—a public health priority. 2012. WHO WHO: Dementia—a public health priority. 2012.
3.
go back to reference Wubbeler M, Thyrian JR, Michalowsky B, Hertel J, Laporte Uribe F, Wolf-Ostermann K, Schafer-Walkmann S, Hoffmann W. Nonpharmacological therapies and provision of aids in outpatient dementia networks in Germany: utilization rates and associated factors. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:229–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wubbeler M, Thyrian JR, Michalowsky B, Hertel J, Laporte Uribe F, Wolf-Ostermann K, Schafer-Walkmann S, Hoffmann W. Nonpharmacological therapies and provision of aids in outpatient dementia networks in Germany: utilization rates and associated factors. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:229–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Heinrich S, Laporte Uribe F, Roes M, Hoffmann W, Thyrian JR, Wolf-Ostermann K, Holle B. Knowledge management in dementia care networks: a qualitative analysis of successful information and support strategies for people with dementia living at home and their family caregivers. Public Health. 2016;131:40–8.CrossRefPubMed Heinrich S, Laporte Uribe F, Roes M, Hoffmann W, Thyrian JR, Wolf-Ostermann K, Holle B. Knowledge management in dementia care networks: a qualitative analysis of successful information and support strategies for people with dementia living at home and their family caregivers. Public Health. 2016;131:40–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Graske J, Meyer S, Schmidt A, Schmidt S, Laporte Uribe F, Thyrian JR, Schafer-Walkmann S, Wolf-Ostermann K. Regional Dementia Care Networks in Germany–results from the DemNet-D-Study regarding the quality of life of their users. Pflege. 2016;29:93–101.CrossRefPubMed Graske J, Meyer S, Schmidt A, Schmidt S, Laporte Uribe F, Thyrian JR, Schafer-Walkmann S, Wolf-Ostermann K. Regional Dementia Care Networks in Germany–results from the DemNet-D-Study regarding the quality of life of their users. Pflege. 2016;29:93–101.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wubbeler M, Wucherer D, Hertel J, Michalowsky B, Heinrich S, Meyer S, Schaefer-Walkmann S, Hoffmann W, Thyrian JR. Antidementia drug treatment in dementia networks in Germany: use rates and factors associated with treatment use. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wubbeler M, Wucherer D, Hertel J, Michalowsky B, Heinrich S, Meyer S, Schaefer-Walkmann S, Hoffmann W, Thyrian JR. Antidementia drug treatment in dementia networks in Germany: use rates and factors associated with treatment use. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Wubbeler M, Thyrian JR, Michalowsky B, Erdmann P, Hertel J, Holle B, Graske J, Schafer-Walkmann S, Hoffmann W. How do people with dementia utilise primary care physicians and specialists within dementia networks? Results of the Dementia Networks in Germany (DemNet-D) study. Health Soc Care Community. 2016. doi:10.1111/hsc.12315.PubMed Wubbeler M, Thyrian JR, Michalowsky B, Erdmann P, Hertel J, Holle B, Graske J, Schafer-Walkmann S, Hoffmann W. How do people with dementia utilise primary care physicians and specialists within dementia networks? Results of the Dementia Networks in Germany (DemNet-D) study. Health Soc Care Community. 2016. doi:10.​1111/​hsc.​12315.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Grant K: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation. 2011. Grant K: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation. 2011.
10.
go back to reference Probst G, Raub S, Romhardt K. Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2012. Probst G, Raub S, Romhardt K. Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2012.
11.
go back to reference Berends H. Exploring knowledge sharing: moves, problem solving and justification. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2005;3:97–105.CrossRef Berends H. Exploring knowledge sharing: moves, problem solving and justification. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2005;3:97–105.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Paulin D, Suneson K. Knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers—three blurry terms in KM. Electron J Knowl Manag 2012;10:81–91. Paulin D, Suneson K. Knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers—three blurry terms in KM. Electron J Knowl Manag 2012;10:81–91.
13.
go back to reference Yates-Mercer P, Bawden D. Managing the paradox: the valuation of knowledge and knowledge management. J Inf Sci. 2002;28:19–29.CrossRef Yates-Mercer P, Bawden D. Managing the paradox: the valuation of knowledge and knowledge management. J Inf Sci. 2002;28:19–29.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rasmussen HS, Haggerty N. Knowledge appraisal and knowledge management systems: judging what we know. J Organ End User Comput. 2008;20:17–34.CrossRef Rasmussen HS, Haggerty N. Knowledge appraisal and knowledge management systems: judging what we know. J Organ End User Comput. 2008;20:17–34.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Geiger D, Schreyögg G. Narratives in knowledge sharing: challenging validity. J Knowl Manag. 2012;16:97–113.CrossRef Geiger D, Schreyögg G. Narratives in knowledge sharing: challenging validity. J Knowl Manag. 2012;16:97–113.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wolf-Ostermann K, Meyer S, Schmidt A, Schritz A, Holle B, Wubbeler M, Schafer-Walkmann S, Graske J. Users of regional dementia care networks in Germany: First results of the evaluation study DemNet-D. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2016. doi:10.1007/s00391-015-1006-9. Wolf-Ostermann K, Meyer S, Schmidt A, Schritz A, Holle B, Wubbeler M, Schafer-Walkmann S, Graske J. Users of regional dementia care networks in Germany: First results of the evaluation study DemNet-D. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2016. doi:10.​1007/​s00391-015-1006-9.
17.
go back to reference LaporteUribe F, Heinrich S, Wolf-Ostermann K, Schmidt S, Thyrian JR, Schafer-Walkmann S, Holle B. Caregiver burden assessed in dementia care networks in Germany: findings from the DemNet-D study baseline. Aging Ment Health. 2016;12:1–12. doi:10.1080/13607863.2016.1181713.CrossRef LaporteUribe F, Heinrich S, Wolf-Ostermann K, Schmidt S, Thyrian JR, Schafer-Walkmann S, Holle B. Caregiver burden assessed in dementia care networks in Germany: findings from the DemNet-D study baseline. Aging Ment Health. 2016;12:1–12. doi:10.​1080/​13607863.​2016.​1181713.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I. Qualitative forschung: ein handbuch. Reinbek: Rowohlt; 2005. Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I. Qualitative forschung: ein handbuch. Reinbek: Rowohlt; 2005.
19.
go back to reference Gräske J, Meyer S, Schmidt A, Schmidt S, Uribe FL, Thyrian JR, Schäfer-Walkmann S, Wolf-Ostermann K. Regionale Demenznetzwerke in Deutschland. Pflege. 2016;29:93–101.CrossRefPubMed Gräske J, Meyer S, Schmidt A, Schmidt S, Uribe FL, Thyrian JR, Schäfer-Walkmann S, Wolf-Ostermann K. Regionale Demenznetzwerke in Deutschland. Pflege. 2016;29:93–101.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zank S, Schacke C, Leipold B. Berliner Inventar zur Angehörigenbelastung—Demenz (BIZA-D): Kurzbeschreibung und grundlegende Kennwerte. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin; 2004. Zank S, Schacke C, Leipold B. Berliner Inventar zur Angehörigenbelastung—Demenz (BIZA-D): Kurzbeschreibung und grundlegende Kennwerte. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin; 2004.
21.
go back to reference Kutzleben M, Reuther S, Dortmann O, Holle B. Care arrangements for community-dwelling people with dementia in Germany as perceived by informal carers—a cross-sectional pilot survey in a provincial–rural setting. Health Soc Care Community. 2015. doi:10.1111/hsc.12202. Kutzleben M, Reuther S, Dortmann O, Holle B. Care arrangements for community-dwelling people with dementia in Germany as perceived by informal carers—a cross-sectional pilot survey in a provincial–rural setting. Health Soc Care Community. 2015. doi:10.​1111/​hsc.​12202.
22.
go back to reference Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag; 2000. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag; 2000.
23.
go back to reference Probst G. Practical knowledge management: A model that works. Prism 1998, 2. Probst G. Practical knowledge management: A model that works. Prism 1998, 2.
24.
go back to reference Karagiannis D, Reimer U. Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management. Berlin: Springer; 2004.CrossRef Karagiannis D, Reimer U. Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management. Berlin: Springer; 2004.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lewins A, Silver C. Using software in qualitative research: a step-by-step guide. London: Sage Publications; 2007.CrossRef Lewins A, Silver C. Using software in qualitative research: a step-by-step guide. London: Sage Publications; 2007.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Washington D.C.: Sage Publications; 2006. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Washington D.C.: Sage Publications; 2006.
27.
go back to reference Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 1998. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 1998.
28.
go back to reference Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19. London: Routledge; 2011. Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19. London: Routledge; 2011.
29.
go back to reference Denscombe M. The good research guide for small scale social research projects. 3rd ed. New York: Open Up; 2007. Denscombe M. The good research guide for small scale social research projects. 3rd ed. New York: Open Up; 2007.
30.
go back to reference Alissi AS: Perspectives on social group work practice: Free Press; 1980. Alissi AS: Perspectives on social group work practice: Free Press; 1980.
31.
go back to reference Cousins JB, Bourgeois I. Organizational capacity to do and use evaluation. New York: Wiley; 2014. Cousins JB, Bourgeois I. Organizational capacity to do and use evaluation. New York: Wiley; 2014.
32.
go back to reference Michalowsky B, Wubbeler M, Thyrian JR, Holle B, Graske J, Schafer-Walkmann S, Flessa S, Hoffmann W. Financing regional dementia networks in Germany: determinants of sustainable healthcare networks. Gesundheitswesen 2016. doi:10.1055/s-0042-102344. Michalowsky B, Wubbeler M, Thyrian JR, Holle B, Graske J, Schafer-Walkmann S, Flessa S, Hoffmann W. Financing regional dementia networks in Germany: determinants of sustainable healthcare networks. Gesundheitswesen 2016. doi:10.​1055/​s-0042-102344.
33.
go back to reference Campbell JA. Creating customer knowledge competence: managing customer relationship management programs strategically. Ind Mark Manage. 2003;32:375–83.CrossRef Campbell JA. Creating customer knowledge competence: managing customer relationship management programs strategically. Ind Mark Manage. 2003;32:375–83.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Gupte MA. Success of University spin-offs; Network activities and moderating effects of internal communication and Adhocracy. Wiesbaden: DUV-publishing; 2007. Gupte MA. Success of University spin-offs; Network activities and moderating effects of internal communication and Adhocracy. Wiesbaden: DUV-publishing; 2007.
35.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SDM, Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.CrossRefPubMed Terwee CB, Bot SDM, Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Singh MD, Kant R. Knowledge management barriers: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag. 2008;3:142–50. Singh MD, Kant R. Knowledge management barriers: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag. 2008;3:142–50.
37.
go back to reference Riege A. Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. J Knowl Manag. 2005;9:18–35.CrossRef Riege A. Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. J Knowl Manag. 2005;9:18–35.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lemieux-Charles L, Chambers LW, Cockerill R, Jaglal S, Brazil K, Cohen C, LeClair K, Dalziel B, Schulmann B. Evaluating the effectiveness of community-based dementia care networks: the Dementia Care Networks’ Study. Gerontologist. 2005;45:456–64.CrossRefPubMed Lemieux-Charles L, Chambers LW, Cockerill R, Jaglal S, Brazil K, Cohen C, LeClair K, Dalziel B, Schulmann B. Evaluating the effectiveness of community-based dementia care networks: the Dementia Care Networks’ Study. Gerontologist. 2005;45:456–64.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Aquinas PG. Organizational Behavior—concepts, realities, applications and challenges. New Delhi: Excel Books; 2006. Aquinas PG. Organizational Behavior—concepts, realities, applications and challenges. New Delhi: Excel Books; 2006.
40.
go back to reference Hensen G, Hensen P. Gesundheitswesen und Sozialstaat. Gesundheitsförderung zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2008.CrossRef Hensen G, Hensen P. Gesundheitswesen und Sozialstaat. Gesundheitsförderung zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2008.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Macmillan P. People, work and organisations. Hampshire: Macmillan Publishers; 2014. Macmillan P. People, work and organisations. Hampshire: Macmillan Publishers; 2014.
Metadata
Title
Knowledge evaluation in dementia care networks: a mixed-methods analysis of knowledge evaluation strategies and the success of informing family caregivers about dementia support services
Authors
Steffen Heinrich
Franziska Laporte Uribe
Markus Wübbeler
Wolfgang Hoffmann
Martina Roes
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1752-4458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-016-0100-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2016 Go to the issue