Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

The reliability and validity for Japanese type 2 diabetes patients of the Japanese version of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire

Authors: Junichi Saito, Wataru Shoji, Hiroaki Kumano

Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to determing which psychological traits of Japanese type 2 diabetes patients would provide reliability and validity to the Japanese version of the Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire (AADQ-J).

Methods

Various questionnaires were administered to type 2 diabetes patients who were registered on the database of the research service provider; data from a total of 600 patients (mean ± SD age was 57.50 ± 9.87 years, female 21.83%) were analyzed.

Results

Three items were excluded because of psychometric concerns related to the original 11-item AADQ. Confirmation factor analyses revealed that the eight-item version demonstrated the best indicators of a goodness of fit. The questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency. The questionnaire demonstrated high measurement accuracy in broad trait values by the test information function of Item Response Theory. The questionnaire showed stronger positive correlations with self-care activities and HbA1c than with diabetes distress and depressive mood.

Conclusions

The eight-item Japanese version of AADQ has reliability and validity for type 2 diabetes patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ali S, Stone MA, Peters JL, et al. The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011;23:1165–73.CrossRef Ali S, Stone MA, Peters JL, et al. The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011;23:1165–73.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, et al. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159–71.CrossRefPubMed Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, et al. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159–71.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rubin R, Napora J. Behavior change. In: Marion KPJF, Polonsky WH, Yarborough P, Zamudio V, editors. A Core curriculum for diabetes education. Chicago: American Association of Diabetes Educators; 2001. Rubin R, Napora J. Behavior change. In: Marion KPJF, Polonsky WH, Yarborough P, Zamudio V, editors. A Core curriculum for diabetes education. Chicago: American Association of Diabetes Educators; 2001.
6.
go back to reference Gregg JA, Callaghan GM, Hayes SC, et al. Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: a randomized controlled trial. JCCP. 2007;75:336. Gregg JA, Callaghan GM, Hayes SC, et al. Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: a randomized controlled trial. JCCP. 2007;75:336.
7.
go back to reference Fall E, Roche B, Izaute M, et al. A brief psychological intervention to improve adherence in type 2 diabetes. Diabete Metab. 2013;39:432–8.CrossRefPubMed Fall E, Roche B, Izaute M, et al. A brief psychological intervention to improve adherence in type 2 diabetes. Diabete Metab. 2013;39:432–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
9.
go back to reference O’Donohue W, Snipes C, et al. A case study of overselling psychotherapy: an ACT intervention for diabetes management. J Contemp Psychother. 2016;46:15–25.CrossRef O’Donohue W, Snipes C, et al. A case study of overselling psychotherapy: an ACT intervention for diabetes management. J Contemp Psychother. 2016;46:15–25.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schmitt A, Reimer A, Kulzer B, et al. Assessment of diabetes acceptance can help identify patients with ineffective diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control. Diabet Med. 2014;31:1446–51.CrossRefPubMed Schmitt A, Reimer A, Kulzer B, et al. Assessment of diabetes acceptance can help identify patients with ineffective diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control. Diabet Med. 2014;31:1446–51.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, et al. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:943–50.CrossRefPubMed Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, et al. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:943–50.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Daitoku M, Honda I, Okumiya A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Japanese translated “the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure”. J Japan Diab Soc. 2006;49:1–9. Daitoku M, Honda I, Okumiya A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Japanese translated “the summary of diabetes self-care activities measure”. J Japan Diab Soc. 2006;49:1–9.
13.
go back to reference Polonsky H, Anderson J, Loherer A, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:754–60.CrossRefPubMed Polonsky H, Anderson J, Loherer A, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:754–60.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ishii H, Welch GH, Jacobson A, et al. The Japanese version of the problem area in diabetes scale: a clinical and research tool for the assessment of emotional functioning among diabetic patients. Diabetes. 1999;48:1397. Ishii H, Welch GH, Jacobson A, et al. The Japanese version of the problem area in diabetes scale: a clinical and research tool for the assessment of emotional functioning among diabetic patients. Diabetes. 1999;48:1397.
15.
go back to reference Ware J, Kline GS. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 health survey, vol. 15. Lincoln RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2001. p. 5. Ware J, Kline GS. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 health survey, vol. 15. Lincoln RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2001. p. 5.
16.
go back to reference Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Manual of the SF-8 Japanese version. Kyoto: Institute for Health Outcomes and Process Evaluation Research; 2004. Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Manual of the SF-8 Japanese version. Kyoto: Institute for Health Outcomes and Process Evaluation Research; 2004.
17.
go back to reference Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1972;1:385–401.CrossRef Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1972;1:385–401.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shima S, Shikano T, Kitamura T, et al. A new self-report depression scale. Psychiatry. 1985;27:717–23. Shima S, Shikano T, Kitamura T, et al. A new self-report depression scale. Psychiatry. 1985;27:717–23.
19.
go back to reference Baker F. The basics of item response theory. ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation. MD: University of Maryland college park; 2001. Baker F. The basics of item response theory. ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation. MD: University of Maryland college park; 2001.
20.
go back to reference Fisher L, Polonsky WH, Hessler DM, et al. Understanding the sources of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2015;29(4):572–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fisher L, Polonsky WH, Hessler DM, et al. Understanding the sources of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2015;29(4):572–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Petrak F, Herpertz S, Albus C, et al. Psychosocial factors and diabetes mellitus: evidence-based treatment guidelines. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2005;1:255–70.CrossRefPubMed Petrak F, Herpertz S, Albus C, et al. Psychosocial factors and diabetes mellitus: evidence-based treatment guidelines. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2005;1:255–70.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The reliability and validity for Japanese type 2 diabetes patients of the Japanese version of the acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire
Authors
Junichi Saito
Wataru Shoji
Hiroaki Kumano
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1751-0759
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-018-0129-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue