Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

The work, goals, challenges, achievements, and recommendations of orphan medicinal product organizations in India: an interview-based study

Authors: Mohua Chakraborty Choudhury, Gayatri Saberwal

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Orphan medicinal products (OMPs) are intended for the diagnosis, prevention, management or treatment of rare diseases (RDs). Each RD affects only a small fraction of the population, and therefore, historically, industry hesitated to undertake relevant research and development (R&D). In response, the governments of many countries came up with orphan drug policies and RD policies which were hugely successful in incentivizing companies to do so. In India, in the absence of any such policy until recently, there are very few organizations involved in RD R&D.

Objectives

We wished to understand (i) the OMP Organizations’ (OMPOs’) areas of work and the nature of their work, (ii) their goals, (iii) the challenges they faced and how they were overcoming them, (iv) their achievements, and (v) their recommendations to the government to help their R&D, their success as commercial entities (where applicable), and patients’ access to their products or services.

Results

Ten of the 14 OMPOs are companies, whereas four are not-for-profit organizations. Almost all of the OMPOs are heavily into R&D. Six have already made their products or services available to patients. Four plan to out-license their products after the pre-clinical phase or phase 1 trials, eight plan to cater to patients directly and two of the OMPOs have been established only recently and thus do not yet have any product or service to offer patients. Nine OMPOs import about 90% of the components in the production process, which comprises either capital or recurrent expenditure. For most, locally manufactured alternatives are not available or are of inadequate quality. Most of the OMPOs have had productive collaborations with local or foreign academics or hospitals for R&D, animal efficacy studies, clinical trials or providing services to patients. The main challenges for the OMPOs are the lack of adequate funding, supportive government policies, and a conducive ecosystem.

Conclusions

These OMPOs are pioneers in their respective fields in India, and despite the challenges, have achieved new levels of innovation. With suitable government policies, they could scale up and provide relevant products and services to the large number of RD patients in the country whose medical needs are largely unmet.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Haffner ME. Orphan drug product regulation--United States. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;40:84–8.PubMedCrossRef Haffner ME. Orphan drug product regulation--United States. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;40:84–8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Haffner ME. History of orphan drug regulation-United States and beyond. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100:342–3.PubMedCrossRef Haffner ME. History of orphan drug regulation-United States and beyond. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100:342–3.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scott DL, Alder S, Usui E, Lui K. Orphan drug programs/policies in Australia, Japan, and Canada. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1–16.CrossRef Scott DL, Alder S, Usui E, Lui K. Orphan drug programs/policies in Australia, Japan, and Canada. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1–16.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products and the European Medicines Agency Scientific Secretariat. European regulation on orphan medicinal products: 10 years of experience and future perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:341–9.CrossRef The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products and the European Medicines Agency Scientific Secretariat. European regulation on orphan medicinal products: 10 years of experience and future perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:341–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Attwood MM, Rask-Andersen M, Schiöth HB. Orphan Drugs and their impact on pharmaceutical development. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018;39:525–35.PubMedCrossRef Attwood MM, Rask-Andersen M, Schiöth HB. Orphan Drugs and their impact on pharmaceutical development. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018;39:525–35.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Heemstra HE, van Weely S, Büller HA, Leufkens HGM, de Vrueh RLA. Translation of rare disease research into orphan drug development: disease matters. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14:1166–73.PubMedCrossRef Heemstra HE, van Weely S, Büller HA, Leufkens HGM, de Vrueh RLA. Translation of rare disease research into orphan drug development: disease matters. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14:1166–73.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wellman-Labadie O, Zhou Y. The US orphan drug act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? Health Policy. 2010;95:216–28.PubMedCrossRef Wellman-Labadie O, Zhou Y. The US orphan drug act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity? Health Policy. 2010;95:216–28.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Galati F, Bigliardi B. The unintended effect of the orphan drug act on the adoption of open innovation. Sci Public Policy. 2016;43:840–8. Galati F, Bigliardi B. The unintended effect of the orphan drug act on the adoption of open innovation. Sci Public Policy. 2016;43:840–8.
12.
go back to reference Holtzclaw WP. Policy framework for rare disease health disparities. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2011;12:114–8.CrossRef Holtzclaw WP. Policy framework for rare disease health disparities. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2011;12:114–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gammie T, Lu CY, Babar ZU-D. Access to orphan Drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 countries. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140002.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gammie T, Lu CY, Babar ZU-D. Access to orphan Drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 countries. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140002.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rajasimha HK, Shirol PB, Ramamoorthy P, Hegde M, Barde S, Chandru V, et al. Organization for rare diseases India (ORDI) - addressing the challenges and opportunities for the Indian rare diseases’ community. Genet Res. 2014;96:e009.CrossRef Rajasimha HK, Shirol PB, Ramamoorthy P, Hegde M, Barde S, Chandru V, et al. Organization for rare diseases India (ORDI) - addressing the challenges and opportunities for the Indian rare diseases’ community. Genet Res. 2014;96:e009.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Choudhury MC, Saberwal G. The role of patient organizations in the rare disease ecosystem in India: an interview based study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14:117.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Choudhury MC, Saberwal G. The role of patient organizations in the rare disease ecosystem in India: an interview based study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14:117.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ramamoorthy A, Pacanowski MA, Bull J, Zhang L. Racial/ethnic differences in drug disposition and response: review of recently approved drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97:263–73.PubMedCrossRef Ramamoorthy A, Pacanowski MA, Bull J, Zhang L. Racial/ethnic differences in drug disposition and response: review of recently approved drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97:263–73.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference De Sanctis V, Kattamis C, Canatan D, Soliman AT, Elsedfy H, Karimi M, et al. β-Thalassemia distribution in the Old World: an ancient disease seen from a historical standpoint. Mediterr J Hematol. Infect Dis. 2017;9:e2017018. De Sanctis V, Kattamis C, Canatan D, Soliman AT, Elsedfy H, Karimi M, et al. β-Thalassemia distribution in the Old World: an ancient disease seen from a historical standpoint. Mediterr J Hematol. Infect Dis. 2017;9:e2017018.
20.
go back to reference Rawson NSB. Health technology assessment of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: impact of disease prevalence and cost. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rawson NSB. Health technology assessment of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: impact of disease prevalence and cost. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guan X, Zhang J, Man C, Ni B, Shi L. How far have we come? Challenges to orphan drug access in China, 2011-2017. J Pharm Sci. 2019;108:2199–205.PubMedCrossRef Guan X, Zhang J, Man C, Ni B, Shi L. How far have we come? Challenges to orphan drug access in China, 2011-2017. J Pharm Sci. 2019;108:2199–205.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference McIntosh J, Alonso A, MacLure K, Stewart D, Kempen T, Mair A, et al. A case study of polypharmacy management in nine European countries: implications for change management and implementation. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195232.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McIntosh J, Alonso A, MacLure K, Stewart D, Kempen T, Mair A, et al. A case study of polypharmacy management in nine European countries: implications for change management and implementation. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195232.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jarosławski S, Saberwal G. Case studies of innovative medical device companies from India: barriers and enablers to development. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:199.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jarosławski S, Saberwal G. Case studies of innovative medical device companies from India: barriers and enablers to development. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:199.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jarosławski S, Saberwal G. In eHealth in India today, the nature of work, the challenges and the finances: an interview-based study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jarosławski S, Saberwal G. In eHealth in India today, the nature of work, the challenges and the finances: an interview-based study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chaudhuri S. The pharmaceutical industry in India after TRIPS. In: Löfgren H, Williams OD, editors. The new political economy of pharmaceuticals: production, innovation and TRIPS in the global south. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2013. p. 111–33.CrossRef Chaudhuri S. The pharmaceutical industry in India after TRIPS. In: Löfgren H, Williams OD, editors. The new political economy of pharmaceuticals: production, innovation and TRIPS in the global south. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2013. p. 111–33.CrossRef
27.
31.
go back to reference Agrawal R. The first approved agent in the Glitazar’s class: Saroglitazar. Curr Drug Targets. 2014;15:151–5.PubMedCrossRef Agrawal R. The first approved agent in the Glitazar’s class: Saroglitazar. Curr Drug Targets. 2014;15:151–5.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Xu K, Coté TR. Database identifies FDA-approved drugs with potential to be repurposed for treatment of orphan diseases. Brief Bioinform. 2011;12:341–5.PubMedCrossRef Xu K, Coté TR. Database identifies FDA-approved drugs with potential to be repurposed for treatment of orphan diseases. Brief Bioinform. 2011;12:341–5.PubMedCrossRef
37.
42.
go back to reference Petrova E. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the process of drug discovery and development. In: Ding M, Eliashberg J, Stremersch S, editors. Innovation and Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry. International series in quantitative marketing, vol 20. New York: Springer; 2014. Petrova E. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the process of drug discovery and development. In: Ding M, Eliashberg J, Stremersch S, editors. Innovation and Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry. International series in quantitative marketing, vol 20. New York: Springer; 2014.
44.
go back to reference Van Norman GA. Drugs, devices, and the FDA: part 2: an overview of approval processes: FDA approval of medical devices. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016;1:277–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Van Norman GA. Drugs, devices, and the FDA: part 2: an overview of approval processes: FDA approval of medical devices. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016;1:277–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Thomas S, Caplan A. The orphan drug act revisited. JAMA. 2019;15:151–5. Thomas S, Caplan A. The orphan drug act revisited. JAMA. 2019;15:151–5.
46.
go back to reference Ahmad A, Khan MU, Patel I. Drug pricing policies in one of the largest drug manufacturing nations in the world: are affordability and access a cause for concern? Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2015;4:1–3. Ahmad A, Khan MU, Patel I. Drug pricing policies in one of the largest drug manufacturing nations in the world: are affordability and access a cause for concern? Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2015;4:1–3.
50.
go back to reference Jarosławski S, Toumi M. Non-profit drug research and development: the case study of Genethon. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019;7:1545514.PubMedCrossRef Jarosławski S, Toumi M. Non-profit drug research and development: the case study of Genethon. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019;7:1545514.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Kesselheim AS, Tan YT, Avorn J. The roles of academia, rare diseases, and repurposing in the development of the most transformative drugs. Health Aff. 2015;34:286–93.CrossRef Kesselheim AS, Tan YT, Avorn J. The roles of academia, rare diseases, and repurposing in the development of the most transformative drugs. Health Aff. 2015;34:286–93.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Padmanaban G, Swarup R. Biomedical research in India: paradigm shift to translation. Curr Sci. 2016;111:239–40. Padmanaban G, Swarup R. Biomedical research in India: paradigm shift to translation. Curr Sci. 2016;111:239–40.
53.
go back to reference Dash SP, Saberwal G. The bio-incubation boom in India. Curr Sci. 2018;115:228–33.CrossRef Dash SP, Saberwal G. The bio-incubation boom in India. Curr Sci. 2018;115:228–33.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Thomas CJ, McKew JC. Playing well with others! Initiating and sustaining successful collaborations between industry, academia and government. Curr Top Med Chem. 2014;14:291–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Thomas CJ, McKew JC. Playing well with others! Initiating and sustaining successful collaborations between industry, academia and government. Curr Top Med Chem. 2014;14:291–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Birnkrant DJ, Bushby K, Bann CM, Alman BA, Apkon SD, Blackwell A, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 2: respiratory, cardiac, bone health, and orthopaedic management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:347–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Birnkrant DJ, Bushby K, Bann CM, Alman BA, Apkon SD, Blackwell A, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 2: respiratory, cardiac, bone health, and orthopaedic management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:347–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Ferrara G, Luppi F, Birring SS, Cerri S, Caminati A, Sköld M, et al. Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27(147).PubMedCrossRef Ferrara G, Luppi F, Birring SS, Cerri S, Caminati A, Sköld M, et al. Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27(147).PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Edwards GC. Implementing public policy; 1980. Edwards GC. Implementing public policy; 1980.
58.
go back to reference Micallef J, Boutouyrie P, Blin O. Pharmacology and drug development in rare diseases: the attractiveness and expertise of the French medical pharmacology. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2017;31:685–94.PubMed Micallef J, Boutouyrie P, Blin O. Pharmacology and drug development in rare diseases: the attractiveness and expertise of the French medical pharmacology. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2017;31:685–94.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The work, goals, challenges, achievements, and recommendations of orphan medicinal product organizations in India: an interview-based study
Authors
Mohua Chakraborty Choudhury
Gayatri Saberwal
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1224-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2019 Go to the issue