Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012

Authors: Kim Pauwels, Isabelle Huys, Minne Casteels, Kristina Larsson, Caroline Voltz, Karri Penttila, Thomas Morel, Steven Simoens

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Orphan designated medicinal products benefit from regulatory and economic incentives for orphan drug development. Approximately 40% of orphan designations target rare neoplastic disorders, referring to rare cancers. In order to provide more insights in drugs for rare neoplastic disorders that are under development and to better understand the role of orphan designation in the development of oncology drugs, this study investigates the characteristics of the product, the indication and the applicants as well as the stage of development of products with an orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders and compares them with products with an orphan designation for other rare indications. Therefore, orphan designation application files and annual reports submitted by the applicant were reviewed at the premises of the European Medicines Agency.

Results

At the time of application, 41.6% of products with orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders were in pre-clinical phase; this was 65.1% for other rare conditions (p < 0.05). Thirty percent of orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders had reached phase 1; compared to 19.3% of orphan designations targeting other rare conditions (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed for the stage of development at the time of the latest annual report. Significant benefit was more often considered for orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders compared to orphan designations for other rare conditions.

Conclusion

Orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders involve products that are in a more advanced stages of development compared to orphan designations for other (non-oncology) rare conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, Siesling S, Dei Tos AP, Kunkler I, et al. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(17):2493–511.CrossRefPubMed Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, Siesling S, Dei Tos AP, Kunkler I, et al. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(17):2493–511.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 847/2000 of 27 April 2000 laying down the provisions for implementation of the criteria for designation of a medicinal product as an orphan medicinal product and definitions of the concepts ‘similar medicinal product’ and ‘clinical superiority’. 28-4-2000. Ref Type: Statute. COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 847/2000 of 27 April 2000 laying down the provisions for implementation of the criteria for designation of a medicinal product as an orphan medicinal product and definitions of the concepts ‘similar medicinal product’ and ‘clinical superiority’. 28-4-2000. Ref Type: Statute.
4.
go back to reference Morel T, Lhoir A, Picavet E, Mariz S, Sepodes B, Llinares J, et al. Regulatory watch: the orphan drug pipeline in Europe. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(6):376.CrossRefPubMed Morel T, Lhoir A, Picavet E, Mariz S, Sepodes B, Llinares J, et al. Regulatory watch: the orphan drug pipeline in Europe. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(6):376.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(12):921–9.CrossRefPubMed Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(12):921–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mariz S, Reese JH, Westermark K, Greene L, Goto T, Hoshino T, et al. Worldwide collaboration for orphan drug designation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(6):440–1.CrossRefPubMed Mariz S, Reese JH, Westermark K, Greene L, Goto T, Hoshino T, et al. Worldwide collaboration for orphan drug designation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(6):440–1.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ashley D, Thomas D, Gore L, Carter R, Zalcberg JR, Otmar R, et al. Accepting risk in the acceleration of drug development for rare cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):e190–4.CrossRefPubMed Ashley D, Thomas D, Gore L, Carter R, Zalcberg JR, Otmar R, et al. Accepting risk in the acceleration of drug development for rare cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):e190–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
Authors
Kim Pauwels
Isabelle Huys
Minne Casteels
Kristina Larsson
Caroline Voltz
Karri Penttila
Thomas Morel
Steven Simoens
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0578-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2017 Go to the issue