Published in:
Open Access
01-12-2019 | Thoracic Trauma | Research article
Surgical management versus non-surgical management of rib fractures in chest trauma:a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors:
Xin Liu, Kai Xiong
Published in:
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
|
Issue 1/2019
Login to get access
Abstract
Objective
Rib fractures are common injuries sustained by patients who experience high-impact chest trauma, and they result in severe respiratory compromise because of the altered mechanics of respiration. Several studies have shown that the ventilation requirements and incidence of pulmonary complications may be decreased with operative intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical fixation treatments for rib fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
A literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases for information from February 1958 to April 2018. Studies comparing the benefits of surgical management with that of non-surgical management of rib fractures were included. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated by the X2 test with the significance set to P < 0.10 or I2 > 50%.
Results
Fourteen studies consisting of 839 patients were included (407 patients in the surgical management group; 432 patients in the non-surgical management group). The results showed that the surgical management group experienced a significant decrease in hospitalization time, intensive care time, mechanical ventilation time, mortality rate, pulmonary infection rate and tracheotomy rate compared with the non-surgical management group. However, the surgical management group incurred extra costs, and there was no significant difference in the duration of antibiotic use between the two groups.
Conclusions
Compared with non-surgical management, surgical management methods are of great value in the treatment of rib fractures despite the added expense.