Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Validity of upfront surgery for patients with unsuspected lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a propensity scoring matching study

Authors: Jae Kil Park, Jae Jun Kim, Seok Whan Moon, Deog Gon Cho

Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy is well-established as being superior to upfront esophagectomy when locoregional lymph node (LN) metastasis is present in esophageal cancer, upfront esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy may be performed in patients with LN metastasis due to unreliable preoperative evaluations. However, outcomes in this setting remain unclear. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether upfront esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy in patients with unsuspected lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer is appropriate.

Methods

We included 215 squamous cell esophageal cancer patients who met the study criteria. Inclusion criteria included complete (R0) and curative surgery cases, intra-thoracic esophageal cancer, preoperative biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma, and cases without LN metastasis (WL, cN0 and pN0) or with unsuspected LN metastasis (UL, cN0 and pN1). Exclusion criteria were palliation or salvage cases, other uncured previous or current primary cancers, complete remission cases, and operative mortalities (defined as patients who died during hospitalization or within one month after surgery). We compared 5-year disease- free survival (DFS) between WL and UL. In addition, we investigated the influence of neoadjuvant therapy in UL. To overcome heterogeneity in baseline characteristics between the groups, a propensity matched-analysis based on propensity scores was then carried out to create a cohort of WL with clinical characteristics similar to those in UL.

Results

The incidence of UL among preoperative N0 patients was 25.6% and the incidence of UL cases who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy was 47.2%. All subjects were stratified into either WL (160 patients) or UL (55 patients). Twenty nine of 55 patients in UL received neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy and all patients with LN metastasis received adjuvant therapy after esophagectomy. There was no significant difference in DFS between WL and UL (p = 0.242). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in DFS between cases that received and did not receive neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.769).

Conclusions

Upfront surgery without neoadjuvant therapy in UL is appropriate for patients who can tolerate adjuvant therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peng J, Wang WP, Dong T, Cai J, Ni PZ, Chen LQ. Refining the nodal staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on lymph node stations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(1):280–6.CrossRefPubMed Peng J, Wang WP, Dong T, Cai J, Ni PZ, Chen LQ. Refining the nodal staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on lymph node stations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(1):280–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannova R, Arnold D. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v50–7.CrossRefPubMed Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannova R, Arnold D. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v50–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Xu Y, Yu X, Chen Q, Mao W. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment: which one is better for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xu Y, Yu X, Chen Q, Mao W. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment: which one is better for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Berry MF. Esophageal cancer: staging system and guidelines for staging and treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 3):S289–97.PubMedPubMedCentral Berry MF. Esophageal cancer: staging system and guidelines for staging and treatment. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 3):S289–97.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Matsuda S, Tsubosa Y, Sato H, Takebayashi K, Kawamorita K, Mori K, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(2):1–8.CrossRef Matsuda S, Tsubosa Y, Sato H, Takebayashi K, Kawamorita K, Mori K, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(2):1–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ozis SE, Soydal C, Akyol C, Can N, Kucuk ON, Yagcı C, et al. The role of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the primary staging of rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ozis SE, Soydal C, Akyol C, Can N, Kucuk ON, Yagcı C, et al. The role of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the primary staging of rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Sasaki K, Uchikado Y, Okumura H, Omoto I, Kita Y, Arigami T, et al. Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(2):859–64.CrossRefPubMed Sasaki K, Uchikado Y, Okumura H, Omoto I, Kita Y, Arigami T, et al. Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(2):859–64.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yasuda T, Yano M, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Higuchi I, Takiguchi S, et al. Systemic control and evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with (1)(8)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-positive lymph nodes. Surg Today. 2015;45(3):335–45.CrossRefPubMed Yasuda T, Yano M, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Higuchi I, Takiguchi S, et al. Systemic control and evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with (1)(8)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-positive lymph nodes. Surg Today. 2015;45(3):335–45.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Song IH, Cho S, Yang HC, Jheon S. The role of maximum standardized uptake value in PET/CT as a prognostic factor in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:335–40.CrossRefPubMed Song IH, Cho S, Yang HC, Jheon S. The role of maximum standardized uptake value in PET/CT as a prognostic factor in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:335–40.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stiles BM, Mirza F, Coppolino A, Port JL, Lee PC, Paul S, et al. Clinical T2-T3N0M0 esophageal cancer: the risk of node positive disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92(2):491–6; discussion 6–8. Stiles BM, Mirza F, Coppolino A, Port JL, Lee PC, Paul S, et al. Clinical T2-T3N0M0 esophageal cancer: the risk of node positive disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92(2):491–6; discussion 6–8.
12.
go back to reference Park JK, Kim JJ, Moon SW. A study about different findings of PET-CT between neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy: SUVmax is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(5):784–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park JK, Kim JJ, Moon SW. A study about different findings of PET-CT between neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy: SUVmax is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(5):784–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Rice TW, Mason DP, Murthy SC, Zuccaro G Jr, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, et al. T2N0M0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(2):317–24.CrossRefPubMed Rice TW, Mason DP, Murthy SC, Zuccaro G Jr, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, et al. T2N0M0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(2):317–24.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Talsma K, Wijnhoven B, van Lanschot J, van Berge Henegouwen M. Impact of neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on lymph node status in esophageal Cancer: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;266(6):e52–3.CrossRef Talsma K, Wijnhoven B, van Lanschot J, van Berge Henegouwen M. Impact of neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on lymph node status in esophageal Cancer: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;266(6):e52–3.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090–8.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Okumura H, Uchikado Y, Omoto I, Kita Y, Sasaki K, Arigami T, et al. The usefulness of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer with multiple lymph-node metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):2845–9.CrossRefPubMed Okumura H, Uchikado Y, Omoto I, Kita Y, Sasaki K, Arigami T, et al. The usefulness of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer with multiple lymph-node metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):2845–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Klevebro F, Alexandersson von Döbeln G, Wang N, Johnsen G, Jacobsen AB, Friesland S, et al. A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(4):660–7.CrossRefPubMed Klevebro F, Alexandersson von Döbeln G, Wang N, Johnsen G, Jacobsen AB, Friesland S, et al. A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(4):660–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Koen Talsma A, Shapiro J, Looman CW, van Hagen P, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, et al. Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival. Ann Surg 2014;260(5):786–792; discussion 92–93. Koen Talsma A, Shapiro J, Looman CW, van Hagen P, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, et al. Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival. Ann Surg 2014;260(5):786–792; discussion 92–93.
19.
go back to reference de Heer EC, Hulshoff JB, Klerk D, Burgerhof JGM, de Groot DJA, Plukker JTM, et al. Effect of extending the original eligibility criteria for the CROSS neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on toxicity and survival in esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):1811–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Heer EC, Hulshoff JB, Klerk D, Burgerhof JGM, de Groot DJA, Plukker JTM, et al. Effect of extending the original eligibility criteria for the CROSS neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on toxicity and survival in esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):1811–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference De Giacomo T, Trentino P, Venuta F, Tsagkaropoulos S, Berloco PB, Diso D, et al. Surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent: analysis of a single center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;8:52.CrossRef De Giacomo T, Trentino P, Venuta F, Tsagkaropoulos S, Berloco PB, Diso D, et al. Surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent: analysis of a single center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;8:52.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validity of upfront surgery for patients with unsuspected lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a propensity scoring matching study
Authors
Jae Kil Park
Jae Jun Kim
Seok Whan Moon
Deog Gon Cho
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1749-8090
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0757-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue