Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures

Authors: Xiang Salim, Peter D’Alessandro, James Little, Kulvir Mudhar, Kevin Murray, Richard Carey Smith, Piers Yates

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The most appropriate treatment of pathological fractures from metastatic disease depends on several factors, one of the most important being predicted life expectancy. The aim of this study was to identify the variables that influence prognosis and utilise these to develop a novel scoring system to better predict life expectancy post-pathological fracture.

Methods

The records of all patients that presented with metastatic pathological fractures over a 10-year period from the only tertiary orthopaedic departments in Western Australia were retrospectively examined. Variables assessed were primary cancer type, fracture site, fixation method, cement augmentation, pre-morbid level of physical functioning, complication rate, treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy and appendicular, spinal and visceral metastatic load.

Results

A total of 233 patients were included. Median survival from fracture to death was 4.1 months. Median time from cancer diagnosis to pathological fracture was 14.2 months. There was a statistically significant association between patient survival and primary cancer type, physical functional score, spinal metastatic burden and use of chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Conclusion

A novel scoring system has been developed that offers a survival probability based on patient’s individual circumstances. This can guide specialist management and offer patients a more accurate expectation of functional outcome and survival time.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Santini D, Tampellini M, Vincenzi B, et al. Natural history of bone metastasis in colorectal cancer: final results of a large Italian bone metastases study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2072–7.CrossRefPubMed Santini D, Tampellini M, Vincenzi B, et al. Natural history of bone metastasis in colorectal cancer: final results of a large Italian bone metastases study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2072–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Böhm P, Huber J. The surgical treament of bony metastases of the spine and limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:521–9.CrossRefPubMed Böhm P, Huber J. The surgical treament of bony metastases of the spine and limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:521–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Casadei R, et al. Protocol of surgical treatment of long bone pathological fractures. Injury. 2010;41:1161–7.CrossRefPubMed Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Casadei R, et al. Protocol of surgical treatment of long bone pathological fractures. Injury. 2010;41:1161–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sorensen MS, Gregersen KG, Gum-Schwensen T, et al. Patient and implant survival following joint replacement because of metastatic bone disease. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:301–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sorensen MS, Gregersen KG, Gum-Schwensen T, et al. Patient and implant survival following joint replacement because of metastatic bone disease. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:301–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Harvey N, Ahlmann ER, Allison DC, et al. Endoprosthesis last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:684–91.CrossRefPubMed Harvey N, Ahlmann ER, Allison DC, et al. Endoprosthesis last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:684–91.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hansen BH, Keller J, Laitinen M, et al. The Scandanavian sarcoma group skeletal metastasis register survival after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2004;75:11–5.CrossRefPubMed Hansen BH, Keller J, Laitinen M, et al. The Scandanavian sarcoma group skeletal metastasis register survival after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2004;75:11–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wedin R, Hansen BH, Laitinen M, et al. Complications and survival after surgical treatment of 214 metastatic lesions of the humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21:1049–55.CrossRef Wedin R, Hansen BH, Laitinen M, et al. Complications and survival after surgical treatment of 214 metastatic lesions of the humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21:1049–55.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bauer HC, Wedin R. Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases: prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop. 1995;66(2):143–6.CrossRef Bauer HC, Wedin R. Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases: prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop. 1995;66(2):143–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nathan SS, Healey JH, Mellano D, et al. Survival in patients operated on for pathological fracture: implications for end-of-life orthopaedic care. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6072–82.CrossRefPubMed Nathan SS, Healey JH, Mellano D, et al. Survival in patients operated on for pathological fracture: implications for end-of-life orthopaedic care. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6072–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S. Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumour prognosis. Spine. 1990;15(11):1110–3.CrossRefPubMed Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Toriyama S. Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumour prognosis. Spine. 1990;15(11):1110–3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hill T, D'Alessandro P, Murray K, et al. Prognostic factors following pathological fractures. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:159–63.CrossRefPubMed Hill T, D'Alessandro P, Murray K, et al. Prognostic factors following pathological fractures. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:159–63.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–55.CrossRefPubMed Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–55.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Forsberg JA, Eberhardt J, Boland PJ, et al. Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a bayesian belief network. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19956.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forsberg JA, Eberhardt J, Boland PJ, et al. Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a bayesian belief network. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19956.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6243s–9s.CrossRefPubMed Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6243s–9s.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Wakai K, et al. Prognostic factors and a scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87-B:698–703.CrossRef Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Wakai K, et al. Prognostic factors and a scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87-B:698–703.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, et al. Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(11):1488–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, et al. Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(11):1488–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Dardic M, Wibmer C, Berhold A, et al. Evaluation of prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases in 196 patients treated during 2005-2010. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(10):2133–41.CrossRefPubMed Dardic M, Wibmer C, Berhold A, et al. Evaluation of prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases in 196 patients treated during 2005-2010. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(10):2133–41.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A novel scoring system to guide prognosis in patients with pathological fractures
Authors
Xiang Salim
Peter D’Alessandro
James Little
Kulvir Mudhar
Kevin Murray
Richard Carey Smith
Piers Yates
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0931-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018 Go to the issue