Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ entrance points and superior gluteal artery

Authors: Yong Zhao, Libo You, Wei Lian, Dexin Zou, Shengjie Dong, Tao Sun, Shudong Zhang, Dan Wang, Jingning Li, Wenliang Li, Yuchi Zhao

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To conduct radiologic anatomical study on the relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ entry points and the route of the pelvic outer superior gluteal artery branches with the aim to provide the anatomical basis and technical reference for the avoidance of damage to the superior gluteal artery during the horizontal sacroiliac screw placement.

Methods

Superior gluteal artery CTA (CT angiography) vascular imaging of 74 healthy adults (37 women and 37 men) was done with 128-slice spiral CT (computed tomography). The CT attendant-measuring software was used to portray the “safe bony entrance area” (hereinafter referred to as “Safe Area”) of the S1 segment in the standard lateral pelvic view of three-dimensional reconstruction. The anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ Safe Area and the pelvic outer superior gluteal artery branches was observed and recorded. The number of cases in which artery branches intersected the Safe Area was counted. The cases in which superior gluteal artery branches disjointed from the Safe Area were identified, and the shortest distance between the Safe Area and the superior gluteal artery branch closest to the Safe Area was measured.

Results

Three cases out of the 74 sample cases were excluded from this study as they were found to have no bony space for horizontal screw placement in S1 segment. Among the remaining 71 sample cases, there are 32 cases (45.1%) where the deep superior branch of superior gluteal artery passes through the Safe Area of S1 entrance point. There was no distinguishing feature and rule on how the deep superior branches and the Safe Area overlapped. In the 39 cases in which superior gluteal artery branches disjointed from the Safe Area, the deep superior branches of superior gluteal artery were the branches closest to the Safe Area and the part of the branch closest to the Safe Area was located in front of the widest part of the Safe Area. The shortest distance between the deep superior branch and the Safe Area is 0.86 ± 0.84 cm.

Conclusion

There is a high risk of accidental injury of the deep superior branches of superior gluteal artery in the process of S1 sacroiliac screw placement. Even if the entry points are located in the safe bony entrance area, the absolute secure placement cannot be assured. We suggest that great attention should be paid to make thorough preoperative plans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shuler TE, Boone DC, Gruen GS, Peitzman AB. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation: early treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma. 1995;38(3):453–8.CrossRefPubMed Shuler TE, Boone DC, Gruen GS, Peitzman AB. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation: early treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma. 1995;38(3):453–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Marmor M, Lynch T, Matityahu A. Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement due to aberrant anatomy. Orthopedics. 2010;33(2):117–20.CrossRefPubMed Marmor M, Lynch T, Matityahu A. Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement due to aberrant anatomy. Orthopedics. 2010;33(2):117–20.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Maled I, Velez R, Lopez R, Batalla L, Caja VL. Pseudoaneurysm of the superior gluteal artery during iliosacral screw fixation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73(4):544–7.PubMed Maled I, Velez R, Lopez R, Batalla L, Caja VL. Pseudoaneurysm of the superior gluteal artery during iliosacral screw fixation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73(4):544–7.PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Altman DT, Jones CB, Routt ML Jr. Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(3):220–7.CrossRefPubMed Altman DT, Jones CB, Routt ML Jr. Superior gluteal artery injury during iliosacral screw placement. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(3):220–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Stephen DJG. Pseudoaneurysm of the superior gluteal arterial system: an unusual cause of pain after pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 1997;43(1):146–9.CrossRefPubMed Stephen DJG. Pseudoaneurysm of the superior gluteal arterial system: an unusual cause of pain after pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 1997;43(1):146–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Carlson DA, Scheid DK, Maar DC, Baele JR, Kaehr DM. Safe placement of S1 and S2 iliosacral screws: the “vestibule” concept. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(4):264–9.CrossRefPubMed Carlson DA, Scheid DK, Maar DC, Baele JR, Kaehr DM. Safe placement of S1 and S2 iliosacral screws: the “vestibule” concept. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(4):264–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Day CS, Prayson MJ, Shuler TE, Towers J, Gruen GS. Transsacral versus modified pelvic and marks for percutaneous iliosacral screw placement—a computed tomographic analysis and cadaveric study. Am J Orthop. 2000;29(9 suppl):16–21.PubMed Day CS, Prayson MJ, Shuler TE, Towers J, Gruen GS. Transsacral versus modified pelvic and marks for percutaneous iliosacral screw placement—a computed tomographic analysis and cadaveric study. Am J Orthop. 2000;29(9 suppl):16–21.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Zhao Y, Li J, Wang D, Liu Y, Tan J, Zhang S. Comparison of stability of two kinds of sacro-iliac screws in the fixation of bilateral sacral fractures in a finite element model. Injury. 2012;43(4):490–4.CrossRefPubMed Zhao Y, Li J, Wang D, Liu Y, Tan J, Zhang S. Comparison of stability of two kinds of sacro-iliac screws in the fixation of bilateral sacral fractures in a finite element model. Injury. 2012;43(4):490–4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zhao Y, Zhang S, Sun T, Wang D. Mechanical comparison between lengthened and short sacroiliac screws in sacral fracture fixation: a finite element analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:601–6.CrossRefPubMed Zhao Y, Zhang S, Sun T, Wang D. Mechanical comparison between lengthened and short sacroiliac screws in sacral fracture fixation: a finite element analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:601–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fu S, Zhao Y, Lian W, Zou D, Sun T, Zhao Y, Tan J, Zhang S, Wang D. Comparison of the risk of breakage of two kinds of sacroiliac screws in the treatment of bilateral sacral fractures. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1558–67.CrossRefPubMed Fu S, Zhao Y, Lian W, Zou D, Sun T, Zhao Y, Tan J, Zhang S, Wang D. Comparison of the risk of breakage of two kinds of sacroiliac screws in the treatment of bilateral sacral fractures. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1558–67.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Collinge C, Coons D, Aschenbrenner J. Risks to the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle during percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion: an anatomical cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(2):96–101.CrossRefPubMed Collinge C, Coons D, Aschenbrenner J. Risks to the superior gluteal neurovascular bundle during percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion: an anatomical cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(2):96–101.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ entrance points and superior gluteal artery
Authors
Yong Zhao
Libo You
Wei Lian
Dexin Zou
Shengjie Dong
Tao Sun
Shudong Zhang
Dan Wang
Jingning Li
Wenliang Li
Yuchi Zhao
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0713-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018 Go to the issue