Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Biomechanical properties of 3D-printed bone scaffolds are improved by treatment with CRFP

Authors: Carlos G. Helguero, Vamiq M. Mustahsan, Sunjit Parmar, Sahana Pentyala, John L. Pfail, Imin Kao, David E. Komatsu, Srinivas Pentyala

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One of the major challenges in orthopedics is to develop implants that overcome current postoperative problems such as osteointegration, proper load bearing, and stress shielding. Current implant techniques such as allografts or endoprostheses never reach full bone integration, and the risk of fracture due to stress shielding is a major concern. To overcome this, a novel technique of reverse engineering to create artificial scaffolds was designed and tested. The purpose of the study is to create a new generation of implants that are both biocompatible and biomimetic.

Methods

3D-printed scaffolds based on physiological trabecular bone patterning were printed. MC3T3 cells were cultured on these scaffolds in osteogenic media, with and without the addition of Calcitonin Receptor Fragment Peptide (CRFP) in order to assess bone formation on the surfaces of the scaffolds. Integrity of these cell-seeded bone-coated scaffolds was tested for their mechanical strength.

Results

The results show that cellular proliferation and bone matrix formation are both supported by our 3D-printed scaffolds. The mechanical strength of the scaffolds was enhanced by trabecular patterning in the order of 20% for compression strength and 60% for compressive modulus. Furthermore, cell-seeded trabecular scaffolds modulus increased fourfold when treated with CRFP.

Conclusion

Upon mineralization, the cell-seeded trabecular implants treated with osteo-inductive agents and pretreated with CRFP showed a significant increase in the compressive modulus. This work will lead to creating 3D structures that can be used in the replacement of not only bone segments, but entire bones.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today. 2013;16(12):496–504.CrossRef Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today. 2013;16(12):496–504.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Leukers B, et al. Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16(12):1121–4.CrossRefPubMed Leukers B, et al. Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16(12):1121–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wang MO, et al. Evaluating 3D-printed biomaterials as scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue engineering. Adv Mater. 2015;27(1):138–44.CrossRefPubMed Wang MO, et al. Evaluating 3D-printed biomaterials as scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue engineering. Adv Mater. 2015;27(1):138–44.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chen C, et al. Biodegradable composite scaffolds of bioactive glass/chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose for hemostatic and bone regeneration. Biotechnol Lett. 2015;37(2):457–65.CrossRefPubMed Chen C, et al. Biodegradable composite scaffolds of bioactive glass/chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose for hemostatic and bone regeneration. Biotechnol Lett. 2015;37(2):457–65.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Khan Y, et al. Tissue engineering of bone: material and matrix considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 1):36–42.CrossRefPubMed Khan Y, et al. Tissue engineering of bone: material and matrix considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 1):36–42.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Orcel P, et al. Multiple domains interacting with Gs in the porcine calcitonin receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14(1):170–82.CrossRefPubMed Orcel P, et al. Multiple domains interacting with Gs in the porcine calcitonin receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14(1):170–82.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pentyala, S., Polypeptides derived from Calcitonin recetors and methods of use. U.S.Patent: 9,518,105; Issued on December 13, 2016. Pentyala, S., Polypeptides derived from Calcitonin recetors and methods of use. U.S.Patent: 9,518,105; Issued on December 13, 2016.
9.
go back to reference Tenenbaum HC, Torontali M, Sukhu B. Effects of bisphosphonates and inorganic pyrophosphate on osteogenesis in vitro. Bone. 1992;13(3):249–55.CrossRefPubMed Tenenbaum HC, Torontali M, Sukhu B. Effects of bisphosphonates and inorganic pyrophosphate on osteogenesis in vitro. Bone. 1992;13(3):249–55.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Franceschi RT, Iyer BS, Cui Y. Effects of ascorbic acid on collagen matrix formation and osteoblast differentiation in murine MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(6):843–54.CrossRefPubMed Franceschi RT, Iyer BS, Cui Y. Effects of ascorbic acid on collagen matrix formation and osteoblast differentiation in murine MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(6):843–54.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cowin SC, Doty SB. Tissue mechanics. New York: Springer; 2007. p. xvi–682.CrossRef Cowin SC, Doty SB. Tissue mechanics. New York: Springer; 2007. p. xvi–682.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference ISO 604:2002 - Plastics-Determination of Compressive Properties, International Organization of Standardization, 2002. ISO 604:2002 - Plastics-Determination of Compressive Properties, International Organization of Standardization, 2002.
13.
go back to reference Wu SL, et al. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science & Engineering R-Reports. 2014;80:1–36.CrossRef Wu SL, et al. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science & Engineering R-Reports. 2014;80:1–36.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hoyer B, et al. Biomimetically mineralized salmon collagen scaffolds for application in bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(4):1059–66.CrossRefPubMed Hoyer B, et al. Biomimetically mineralized salmon collagen scaffolds for application in bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(4):1059–66.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wlodarski KH, Wlodarski PK, Galus R. Bioactive composites for bone regeneration. Review Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2008;10(3):201–10.PubMed Wlodarski KH, Wlodarski PK, Galus R. Bioactive composites for bone regeneration. Review Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2008;10(3):201–10.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Biomechanical properties of 3D-printed bone scaffolds are improved by treatment with CRFP
Authors
Carlos G. Helguero
Vamiq M. Mustahsan
Sunjit Parmar
Sahana Pentyala
John L. Pfail
Imin Kao
David E. Komatsu
Srinivas Pentyala
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0700-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2017 Go to the issue