Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Objective measures of outcome ensure reliable decisions with regard to treatment planning. Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is one of the common outcome measures used for assessing quality of life of patients with elbow disorders. OES consists of three domains: pain, elbow function and social/psychological. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the OES.

Methods

The study’s sample includes 82 patients with elbow problems. The original version of the OES was translated into Turkish using the Isis Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Process. The construct validity of the Turkish version of the OES was tested using a confirmatory factor analysis. For internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated. A Pearson correlation and a dependent sample t test were utilised for reproducibility of the OES. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients were calculated between the domains of the OES and Short Form 36 (SF36). An independent sample t test was calculated to determine if there was a significant difference between the scores of the participants from the upper and lower groups.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicates that the three-factor structure of the OES was confirmed. Most of the fit indices are at the expected level, except for a root mean square error of approximation and an adjusted goodness of fit index. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.91 for the whole scale. The results showed that there are positive and high correlations between the first and follow-up assessments (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). The Turkish OES version and its dimensions have moderate and significant correlations with domains of SF36 in general. The test results indicated that the mean of each item on three domains of the OES was higher for the upper 27 %, and this difference was significant at the 0.01 level.

Conclusions

The Turkish version of the OES is a reliable, valid, reproducible and practical tool. It can be used for patients with elbow disorders and is recommended for clinician use.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I: applications and issues in assessment. BMJ. 1992;305(6861):1074–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I: applications and issues in assessment. BMJ. 1992;305(6861):1074–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(13):835–40.CrossRefPubMed Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(13):835–40.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Patrick D, Guyatt G, Acquadro C. Patient-reported outcomes. In: Higgens J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 2008. p. 531–45.CrossRef Patrick D, Guyatt G, Acquadro C. Patient-reported outcomes. In: Higgens J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 2008. p. 531–45.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull. 2008;87(1):131–61.CrossRefPubMed Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull. 2008;87(1):131–61.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference The B, Reininga IHF, Moumni ME, Eygendaal D. Elbow-specific clinical rating systems: extent of established validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(10):1380–94.CrossRef The B, Reininga IHF, Moumni ME, Eygendaal D. Elbow-specific clinical rating systems: extent of established validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(10):1380–94.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dawons J, Doll H, Boller J, Fitzpatrick R, Little C, Rees J, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The development and validation of a patient reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90-B:466–73.CrossRef Dawons J, Doll H, Boller J, Fitzpatrick R, Little C, Rees J, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The development and validation of a patient reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90-B:466–73.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Haan J, Goei H, Schep NW, Tuinebreijer WE, Patka P, Hartog D. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6(1):39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haan J, Goei H, Schep NW, Tuinebreijer WE, Patka P, Hartog D. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6(1):39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Plaschke HC, Jørgensen A, Thillemann TM, Brorson S, Olsen BS. Validation of the Danish version of the Oxford Elbow Score. Danish Med J. 2013;60(10):4714. Plaschke HC, Jørgensen A, Thillemann TM, Brorson S, Olsen BS. Validation of the Danish version of the Oxford Elbow Score. Danish Med J. 2013;60(10):4714.
9.
go back to reference Barrett P, Kline P. The observation to variable ratio in factor analysis. J Pers Group Behav. 1981;1:23–33. Barrett P, Kline P. The observation to variable ratio in factor analysis. J Pers Group Behav. 1981;1:23–33.
10.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne DC. The MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF 36). Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Sherbourne DC. The MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF 36). Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pınar R. Sağlık araştırmalarında yeni bir kavram: Yaşam kalitesi, bir yaşam kalitesi ölçeğinin kronik hastalarda geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin sınanması. Hemşirelik Bülteni. 1995;9:85–95. Pınar R. Sağlık araştırmalarında yeni bir kavram: Yaşam kalitesi, bir yaşam kalitesi ölçeğinin kronik hastalarda geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin sınanması. Hemşirelik Bülteni. 1995;9:85–95.
12.
go back to reference Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publication; 2005. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publication; 2005.
13.
go back to reference Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Pstchometrika. 1974;39:31–6.CrossRef Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Pstchometrika. 1974;39:31–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. California: Pearson; 2001. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. California: Pearson; 2001.
15.
go back to reference Sümer N. Yapısal eşitlik modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2000;3(6):49–74. Sümer N. Yapısal eşitlik modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2000;3(6):49–74.
16.
go back to reference Hooper D, Coughan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60. Hooper D, Coughan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60.
17.
go back to reference Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015.
Metadata
Title
The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
Publication date
01-12-2016
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2016 Go to the issue