Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Lung Cancer | Research

The impact of quantitative CT-based tumor volumetric features on the outcomes of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

Authors: Sophia C. Kamran, Thibaud Coroller, Nastaran Milani, Vishesh Agrawal, Elizabeth H. Baldini, Aileen B. Chen, Bruce E. Johnson, David Kozono, Idalid Franco, Nitish Chopra, Roman Zeleznik, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, Raymond Mak

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) has a poor prognosis. Additional prognostic markers are needed for risk-stratification and treatment intensification. This study compares quantitative CT-based volumetric tumor measurements versus International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) TNM staging to predict outcomes.

Materials & methods

A cohort of 105 patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC and treated with chemoradiation (CRT) from 2000 to 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were staged by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM Classification, 8th edition. Tumor volumes and diameters were extracted from radiation planning CT imaging. Univariable and multivariable models were used to analyze relationships between CT features and overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), in-field LRR, any progression, and distant metastasis (DM).

Results

Median follow-up was 21.3 months. Two-year outcomes were as follows: 38% LRR, 31% in-field LRR, 52% DM, 62% any progression, and 47% OS (median survival 16.5 months).
On univariable analysis, UICC T-stage and N-stage were not associated with any clinical outcome. UICC overall stage was only statistically associated with in-field LRR. One imaging feature (3D maximum tumor diameter) was found to be significantly associated with LRR (HR 1.10, p = 0.003), in-field LRR (HR 1.10, p = 0.007), DM (HR 1.10, p = 0.02), any progression (HR 1.10, p = 0.008), and OS (HR 1.10, p = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, this feature remained significantly associated with all outcomes.

Conclusion

For LS-SCLC, quantitative CT-based volumetric tumor measurements were significantly associated with outcomes after CRT and may be better predictors of outcome than TNM stage.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018.
3.
go back to reference Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2439–4544. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2439–4544.
4.
go back to reference Rutter CE, Park HS, Corso CD, et al. Comparison of survival outcomes among standard radiotherapy regimens in limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation. Lung Cancer. 2015;90:243–8.CrossRef Rutter CE, Park HS, Corso CD, et al. Comparison of survival outcomes among standard radiotherapy regimens in limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation. Lung Cancer. 2015;90:243–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Janne PA, Freidlin B, Saxman S, et al. Twenty-five years of clinical research for patients with limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma in North America. Cancer. 2002;95:1528–38.CrossRef Janne PA, Freidlin B, Saxman S, et al. Twenty-five years of clinical research for patients with limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma in North America. Cancer. 2002;95:1528–38.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jackman DM, Johnson BE. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2005;366:1385–96.CrossRef Jackman DM, Johnson BE. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2005;366:1385–96.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gaspar LE, Gay EG, Crawford J, Putnam JB, Herbst RS, Bonner JA. Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (stages I-III): observations from the national cancer data base. Clin Lung Cancer. 2005;6:355–60.CrossRef Gaspar LE, Gay EG, Crawford J, Putnam JB, Herbst RS, Bonner JA. Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (stages I-III): observations from the national cancer data base. Clin Lung Cancer. 2005;6:355–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sculier JP, Chansky K, Crowley JJ, Van Meerbeeck J, Goldstraw P. International Staging Committee and Participating Institutions. The impact of additional prognostic factors on survival and their relationship with the anatomical extent of disease expressed by the 6th edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumors and the proposals for the 7th edition. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:457–66.CrossRef Sculier JP, Chansky K, Crowley JJ, Van Meerbeeck J, Goldstraw P. International Staging Committee and Participating Institutions. The impact of additional prognostic factors on survival and their relationship with the anatomical extent of disease expressed by the 6th edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumors and the proposals for the 7th edition. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:457–66.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stahel R, Ginsberg R, Havemann K, et al. Staging and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: a consensus report. Lung Cancer. 1989;5:119–26.CrossRef Stahel R, Ginsberg R, Havemann K, et al. Staging and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: a consensus report. Lung Cancer. 1989;5:119–26.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shepherd FA, Crowsley J, Van Houtte P, et al. The international association for the study of lung cancer lung cancer staging project: proposals regarding the clinical staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:1067–77.CrossRef Shepherd FA, Crowsley J, Van Houtte P, et al. The international association for the study of lung cancer lung cancer staging project: proposals regarding the clinical staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:1067–77.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ignatius Ou SH, Zell JA. The applicability of the proposed IASLC staging revisions to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with comparison to the current UICC 6th TNM edition. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:300–10.CrossRef Ignatius Ou SH, Zell JA. The applicability of the proposed IASLC staging revisions to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with comparison to the current UICC 6th TNM edition. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:300–10.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jhun BW, Lee KJ, Jeon K, et al. Clinical applicability of staging small cell lung cancer according to the seventh edition of the TNM staging system. Lung Cancer. 2013;81:65–70.CrossRef Jhun BW, Lee KJ, Jeon K, et al. Clinical applicability of staging small cell lung cancer according to the seventh edition of the TNM staging system. Lung Cancer. 2013;81:65–70.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Su XD, Xie HJ, Liu QW, Mo YX, Long H, Rong TH. The prognostic impact of tumor volume on stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;104:91–7.CrossRef Su XD, Xie HJ, Liu QW, Mo YX, Long H, Rong TH. The prognostic impact of tumor volume on stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;104:91–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zhao B, Oxnard GR, Moskowitz CS, et al. A pilot study of volume measurement as a method of tumor response evaluation to aid biomarker development. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4647–53.CrossRef Zhao B, Oxnard GR, Moskowitz CS, et al. A pilot study of volume measurement as a method of tumor response evaluation to aid biomarker development. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4647–53.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mozley PD, Bendtsen C, Zhao B, et al. Measurement of tumor volumes improves RECIST-based response assessments in advanced lung cancer. Transl Oncol. 2012;5:19–25.CrossRef Mozley PD, Bendtsen C, Zhao B, et al. Measurement of tumor volumes improves RECIST-based response assessments in advanced lung cancer. Transl Oncol. 2012;5:19–25.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koo TR, Moon SH, Lim YJ, et al. The effect of tumor volume and its change on survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:283.CrossRef Koo TR, Moon SH, Lim YJ, et al. The effect of tumor volume and its change on survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:283.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ball DL, Fisher R, Burmeister B, et al. Stage is not a reliable indicator of tumor volume in non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary analysis of the trans-Tasman radiation oncology group 99-05 database. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:667–72.CrossRef Ball DL, Fisher R, Burmeister B, et al. Stage is not a reliable indicator of tumor volume in non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary analysis of the trans-Tasman radiation oncology group 99-05 database. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:667–72.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nishino M, Guo M, Jackman DMM, et al. CT tumor volume measurement in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: performance characteristics of an emerging clinical tool. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:54–62.CrossRef Nishino M, Guo M, Jackman DMM, et al. CT tumor volume measurement in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: performance characteristics of an emerging clinical tool. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:54–62.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Agrawal V, Coroller TP, Hou Y, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of response to chemoradiation in resectable locally advanced NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2016;102:1–8.CrossRef Agrawal V, Coroller TP, Hou Y, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of response to chemoradiation in resectable locally advanced NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2016;102:1–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference de Antonio DF, Alfageme F, Gamez P, et al. Results of surgery in small cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer. 2006;52:299–304.CrossRef de Antonio DF, Alfageme F, Gamez P, et al. Results of surgery in small cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer. 2006;52:299–304.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lim E, Yap YK, Des Stayola BL, Nicholson AG, Goldstraw P. The impact of stage and cell type on the prognosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:969–72.CrossRef Lim E, Yap YK, Des Stayola BL, Nicholson AG, Goldstraw P. The impact of stage and cell type on the prognosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:969–72.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Inoue M, Miyoshi S, Yasumitsu T, et al. Surgical results for small cell lung cancer based on the new TNM staging system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1615–9.CrossRef Inoue M, Miyoshi S, Yasumitsu T, et al. Surgical results for small cell lung cancer based on the new TNM staging system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1615–9.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Agrawal V, Coroller TP, Hou Y, et al. Lymph node volume predicts survival but not nodal clearance in stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0174268.CrossRef Agrawal V, Coroller TP, Hou Y, et al. Lymph node volume predicts survival but not nodal clearance in stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0174268.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of quantitative CT-based tumor volumetric features on the outcomes of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer
Authors
Sophia C. Kamran
Thibaud Coroller
Nastaran Milani
Vishesh Agrawal
Elizabeth H. Baldini
Aileen B. Chen
Bruce E. Johnson
David Kozono
Idalid Franco
Nitish Chopra
Roman Zeleznik
Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
Raymond Mak
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1460-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Radiation Oncology 1/2020 Go to the issue