Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Quality of radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials of prostate cancer

Authors: Yu Yang Soon, Desiree Chen, Teng Hwee Tan, Jeremy Tey

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Good radiotherapy reporting in clinical trials of prostate radiotherapy is important because it will allow accurate reproducibility of radiotherapy treatment and minimize treatment variations that can affect patient outcomes. The aim of our study is to assess the quality of prostate radiotherapy (RT) treatment reporting in randomized controlled trials in prostate cancer.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE for randomized trials of prostate cancer, published from 1996 to 2016 and included prostate RT as one of the intervention arms. We assessed if the investigators reported the ten criteria adequately in the trial reports: RT dose prescription method; RT dose-planning procedures; organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints; target volume definition, simulation procedures; treatment verification procedures; total RT dose; fractionation schedule; conduct of quality assurance (QA) as well as presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery. We performed multivariate logistic regression to determine the factors that may influence the quality of reporting.

Results

We found 59 eligible trials. There was significant variability in the quality of reporting. Target volume definition, total RT dose and fractionation schedule were reported adequately in 97% of included trials. OAR constraints, simulation procedures and presence or absence of deviations in RT treatment planning and delivery were reported adequately in 30% of included trials. Twenty-four trials (40%) reported seven criteria or more adequately. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that trials that published their quality assurance results and cooperative group trials were more likely to have adequate quality in reporting in at least seven criteria.

Conclusion

There is significant variability in the quality of reporting on prostate radiotherapy treatment in randomized trials of prostate cancer. We need to have consensus guidelines to standardize the reporting of radiotherapy treatment in randomized trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr, Blackburn B, et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials. 1981;2:31–49.CrossRefPubMed Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr, Blackburn B, et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials. 1981;2:31–49.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Albert JM, Das P. Quality indicators in radiation oncology. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85(4):904e911. Albert JM, Das P. Quality indicators in radiation oncology. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85(4):904e911.
4.
go back to reference Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637–9.CrossRefPubMed Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Biagioli MC, Hoffe SE. Emerging technologies in prostate cancer radiation therapy: improving the therapeutic window. Cancer Control. 2010;17(4):223–32.CrossRefPubMed Biagioli MC, Hoffe SE. Emerging technologies in prostate cancer radiation therapy: improving the therapeutic window. Cancer Control. 2010;17(4):223–32.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bekelman JE, Yahalom J. Quality of Radiotherapy Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2009;73(2):492–8. [cited 22 Feb 2017]CrossRef Bekelman JE, Yahalom J. Quality of Radiotherapy Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2009;73(2):492–8. [cited 22 Feb 2017]CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Perez CA, Gardner P, Glasgow GP. Radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984;10(Suppl 1):119–25.CrossRefPubMed Perez CA, Gardner P, Glasgow GP. Radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984;10(Suppl 1):119–25.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ohri N, Shen X, Dicker AP, Doyle LA, Harrison AS, Showalter TN. Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst [Internet]. 2013;105(6):387–93. Oxford University Press. [cited 2017 Feb 22]CrossRef Ohri N, Shen X, Dicker AP, Doyle LA, Harrison AS, Showalter TN. Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst [Internet]. 2013;105(6):387–93. Oxford University Press. [cited 2017 Feb 22]CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weiner MA, Leventhal B, Brecher ML, Marcus RB, Cantor A, Gieser PW, Ternberg JL, Behm FG, Wharam MD Jr, Chauvenet AR. Randomized study of intensive MOPP-ABVD with or without low-dose total-nodal radiation therapy in the treatment of stages IIB, IIIA2, IIIB, and IV Hodgkin's disease in pediatric patients: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(8):2769–79. Weiner MA, Leventhal B, Brecher ML, Marcus RB, Cantor A, Gieser PW, Ternberg JL, Behm FG, Wharam MD Jr, Chauvenet AR. Randomized study of intensive MOPP-ABVD with or without low-dose total-nodal radiation therapy in the treatment of stages IIB, IIIA2, IIIB, and IV Hodgkin's disease in pediatric patients: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(8):2769–79.
14.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–4.CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bucci M, k, Bevan A, Roach M III. Advances in radiation therapy: conventional to 3D, to IMRT and to 4D, and Beyond. CA: A Cancer J for clinicians. 2005;55(2):117–34. Bucci M, k, Bevan A, Roach M III. Advances in radiation therapy: conventional to 3D, to IMRT and to 4D, and Beyond. CA: A Cancer J for clinicians. 2005;55(2):117–34.
17.
go back to reference Bentzen SM. Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1998;46:5–18.CrossRefPubMed Bentzen SM. Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1998;46:5–18.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Prescribe, Recording, and Reporting Intensity Modulated Photon-Beam Therapy (IMRT). (ICRU report 83). Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. 2010;10(1). Prescribe, Recording, and Reporting Intensity Modulated Photon-Beam Therapy (IMRT). (ICRU report 83). Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. 2010;10(1).
Metadata
Title
Quality of radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials of prostate cancer
Authors
Yu Yang Soon
Desiree Chen
Teng Hwee Tan
Jeremy Tey
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1053-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Radiation Oncology 1/2018 Go to the issue