Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Monitoring of mechanical errors and their dosimetric impact throughout the course of non-coplanar continuous volumetric-modulated arc therapy

Authors: Hideaki Hirashima, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Yuki Miyabe, Megumi Uto, Kiyonao Nakamura, Takashi Mizowaki

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Volumetric-modulated Dynamic WaveArc therapy (VMDWAT) is a non-coplanar continuous volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) delivery technique. Here, we monitored mechanical errors and their impact on dose distributions in VMDWAT using logfiles throughout the course of treatment.

Methods

Fifteen patients were enrolled (2 skull base tumor patients and 13 prostate cancer patients). VMDWAT plans were created for the enrolled patients. The prescribed dose for the skull base tumor was set as 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction, and that for the prostate cancer was set as 72 to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. We acquired logfiles to monitor mechanical errors and their impact on dose distribution in each fraction. The root mean square error (RMSE) in the multi-leaf collimator (MLC), gantry angle, O-ring angle and monitor unit (MU) were calculated using logfiles throughout the course of VMDWAT for each patient. The dosimetric impact of mechanical errors throughout the course of VMDWAT was verified using a logfile-based dose reconstruction method. Dosimetric errors between the reconstructed plans and the original plans were assessed.

Results

A total of 517 datasets, including 55 datasets for the 2 skull base tumor patients and 462 datasets for the 13 prostate cancer patients, were acquired. The RMSE values were less than 0.1 mm, 0.2°, 0.1°, and 0.4 MU for MLC position, gantry angle, O-ring angle, and MU, respectively. For the skull base tumors, the absolute mean dosimetric errors and two standard deviations throughout the course of treatment were less than 1.4% and 1.1%, respectively. For prostate cancer, these absolute values were less than 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively. The largest dosimetric error of 2.5% was observed in a skull base tumor patient. The resultant dosimetric error in the accumulated daily delivered dose distribution, in the patient with the largest error, was up to 1.6% for all dose-volumetric parameters relative to the planned dose distribution.

Conclusions

MLC position, gantry rotation, O-ring rotation and MU were highly accurate and stable throughout the course of treatment. The daily dosimetric errors due to mechanical errors were small. VMDWAT provided high delivery accuracy and stability throughout the course of treatment.

Trial registration

UMIN000023870. Registered: 1 October 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wild E, Bangert M, Nill S, Oelfke U. Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: plan quality versus treatment time. Med Phys. 2015;42:2157–68.CrossRefPubMed Wild E, Bangert M, Nill S, Oelfke U. Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: plan quality versus treatment time. Med Phys. 2015;42:2157–68.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mizowaki T, Takayama K, Nagano K, Miyabe Y, Matsuo Y, Kaneko S, et al. Feasibility evaluation of a new irradiation technique: three-dimensional unicursal irradiation with the Vero4DRT (MHI-TM2000). J Radiat Res. 2013;54:330–6.CrossRefPubMed Mizowaki T, Takayama K, Nagano K, Miyabe Y, Matsuo Y, Kaneko S, et al. Feasibility evaluation of a new irradiation technique: three-dimensional unicursal irradiation with the Vero4DRT (MHI-TM2000). J Radiat Res. 2013;54:330–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Burghelea M, Verellen D, Poels K, Hung C, Nakamura M, Dhont J, et al. Initial characterization, dosimetric benchmark and performance validation of dynamic wave arc. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:1–10.CrossRef Burghelea M, Verellen D, Poels K, Hung C, Nakamura M, Dhont J, et al. Initial characterization, dosimetric benchmark and performance validation of dynamic wave arc. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:1–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Burghelea M, Verellen D, Dhont J, Hung C, Gevaert T, Van den Begin R, et al. Treating patients with dynamic wave arc: first clinical experience. Radiother Oncol. 2017;122:347–51.CrossRefPubMed Burghelea M, Verellen D, Dhont J, Hung C, Gevaert T, Van den Begin R, et al. Treating patients with dynamic wave arc: first clinical experience. Radiother Oncol. 2017;122:347–51.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Uto M, Mizowaki T, Ogura K, Miyabe Y, Nakamura M, Mukumoto N, et al. Volumetric modulated dynamic WaveArc therapy reduces the dose to the hippocampus in patients with pituitary adenomas and craniopharyngiomas. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017;7:382–7.CrossRefPubMed Uto M, Mizowaki T, Ogura K, Miyabe Y, Nakamura M, Mukumoto N, et al. Volumetric modulated dynamic WaveArc therapy reduces the dose to the hippocampus in patients with pituitary adenomas and craniopharyngiomas. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017;7:382–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sato S, Miyabe Y, Takahashi K, Yamada M, Nakamura M, Ishihara Y, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of dynamic WaveArc irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16:73–86.CrossRef Sato S, Miyabe Y, Takahashi K, Yamada M, Nakamura M, Ishihara Y, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of dynamic WaveArc irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16:73–86.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Burghelea M, Verellen D, Poels K, Gevaert T, Depuydt T, Tournel K, et al. Geometric verification of dynamic wave arc delivery with the vero system using orthogonal x-ray fluoroscopic imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:754–61.CrossRefPubMed Burghelea M, Verellen D, Poels K, Gevaert T, Depuydt T, Tournel K, et al. Geometric verification of dynamic wave arc delivery with the vero system using orthogonal x-ray fluoroscopic imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:754–61.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hirashima H, Nakamura M, Miyabe Y, Mukumoto N, Uto M, Nakamura K, et al. Geometric and dosimetric quality assurance using logfiles and a 3D helical diode detector for dynamic WaveArc. Phys Med. 2017;43:107–13.CrossRefPubMed Hirashima H, Nakamura M, Miyabe Y, Mukumoto N, Uto M, Nakamura K, et al. Geometric and dosimetric quality assurance using logfiles and a 3D helical diode detector for dynamic WaveArc. Phys Med. 2017;43:107–13.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Scaggion A, Negri A, Rossato MA, Roggio A, Simonato F, Bacco S, et al. Delivering RapidArc®: a comprehensive study on accuracy and long term stability. Phys Med. 2016;32:866–73.CrossRefPubMed Scaggion A, Negri A, Rossato MA, Roggio A, Simonato F, Bacco S, et al. Delivering RapidArc®: a comprehensive study on accuracy and long term stability. Phys Med. 2016;32:866–73.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Olasolo-Alonso J, Vazquez-Galinanes A, Pellejero-Pellejero S, Perez-Azorin JF. Evaluation of MLC performance in VMAT and dynamic IMRT by log file analysis. Phys Med. 2017;33:87–94.CrossRefPubMed Olasolo-Alonso J, Vazquez-Galinanes A, Pellejero-Pellejero S, Perez-Azorin JF. Evaluation of MLC performance in VMAT and dynamic IMRT by log file analysis. Phys Med. 2017;33:87–94.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Rozendaal R, Van Oers RFM, Mijnheer B, Mans A. Virtual patient 3D dose reconstruction using in air EPID measurements and a back-projection algorithm for IMRT and VMAT treatments. Phys Med. 2017;37:49–57.CrossRefPubMed Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Rozendaal R, Van Oers RFM, Mijnheer B, Mans A. Virtual patient 3D dose reconstruction using in air EPID measurements and a back-projection algorithm for IMRT and VMAT treatments. Phys Med. 2017;37:49–57.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Neal B, Ahmed M, Kathuria K, Watkins T, Wijesooriya K, Siebers J. A clinically observed discrepancy between image-based and log-based MLC positions. Med Phys. 2016;43:2933–5.CrossRefPubMed Neal B, Ahmed M, Kathuria K, Watkins T, Wijesooriya K, Siebers J. A clinically observed discrepancy between image-based and log-based MLC positions. Med Phys. 2016;43:2933–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hirashima H, Miyabe Y, Yokota K, Nakamura M, Mukumoto N, Mizowaki T, et al. SU-F-T-230: a simple method to assess accuracy of dynamic wave arc irradiation using an electronic portal imaging device and log files. Med Phys. 2016;43:3515.CrossRef Hirashima H, Miyabe Y, Yokota K, Nakamura M, Mukumoto N, Mizowaki T, et al. SU-F-T-230: a simple method to assess accuracy of dynamic wave arc irradiation using an electronic portal imaging device and log files. Med Phys. 2016;43:3515.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference D’Amico A, Whittington R, Malkowicz S, Schultz D, Silver B, Henry L, et al. Clinical utility of percent-positive prostate biopsies in. Predicting biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Mol Urol. 2000;4:171–5.PubMed D’Amico A, Whittington R, Malkowicz S, Schultz D, Silver B, Henry L, et al. Clinical utility of percent-positive prostate biopsies in. Predicting biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Mol Urol. 2000;4:171–5.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Oliver M, Bush K, Zavgorodni S, Ansbacher W, Beckham WA. Understanding the impact of RapidArc therapy delivery errors for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:32–43.CrossRef Oliver M, Bush K, Zavgorodni S, Ansbacher W, Beckham WA. Understanding the impact of RapidArc therapy delivery errors for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:32–43.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Katsuta Y, Kadoya N, Fujita Y, Shimizu E, Matsunaga K, Matsushita H, et al. Quantification of residual dose estimation error on log file-based patient dose calculation. Phys Med. 2016;32:701–5.CrossRefPubMed Katsuta Y, Kadoya N, Fujita Y, Shimizu E, Matsunaga K, Matsushita H, et al. Quantification of residual dose estimation error on log file-based patient dose calculation. Phys Med. 2016;32:701–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tyagi N, Yang K, Gersten D, Yan D. A real time dose monitoring and dose reconstruction tool for patients specific VMAT QA and delivery. Med Phys. 2012;39:7194–204.CrossRefPubMed Tyagi N, Yang K, Gersten D, Yan D. A real time dose monitoring and dose reconstruction tool for patients specific VMAT QA and delivery. Med Phys. 2012;39:7194–204.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wahl M, Descovich M, Shugard E, Pinnaduwage D, Sudhyadhom A, Chang A, et al. Interfraction anatomical variability can lead to significantly increased rectal dose for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16:178–87.CrossRefPubMed Wahl M, Descovich M, Shugard E, Pinnaduwage D, Sudhyadhom A, Chang A, et al. Interfraction anatomical variability can lead to significantly increased rectal dose for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16:178–87.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Terashima K, Nakamura K, Shioyama Y, Sasaki T, Ohga S, Nonoshita T, et al. Can a belly board reduce respiratory-induced prostate motion in the prone position? — assessed by cine-magnetic resonance imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013;12:447–53.CrossRefPubMed Terashima K, Nakamura K, Shioyama Y, Sasaki T, Ohga S, Nonoshita T, et al. Can a belly board reduce respiratory-induced prostate motion in the prone position? — assessed by cine-magnetic resonance imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013;12:447–53.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Brock KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR, Li H, Kessler ML. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 132. Med Phys. 2017;44:e43–76.CrossRefPubMed Brock KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR, Li H, Kessler ML. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 132. Med Phys. 2017;44:e43–76.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Monitoring of mechanical errors and their dosimetric impact throughout the course of non-coplanar continuous volumetric-modulated arc therapy
Authors
Hideaki Hirashima
Mitsuhiro Nakamura
Yuki Miyabe
Megumi Uto
Kiyonao Nakamura
Takashi Mizowaki
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-0972-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Radiation Oncology 1/2018 Go to the issue