Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Torsion bottle, a very simple, reliable, and cheap tool for a basic scoliosis screening

Authors: Michele Romano, Matteo Mastrantonio

Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One of the reasons that make scoliosis a disease that scares so much the parents is its specific characteristic of being difficult to detect on its onset.
The aim of this paper is to check the possible usefulness of a simple tool (the torsion bottle) that has been developed with the aim to offer an instrument for home use by parents but also for screening purposes in the low-income countries.

Methods

Study design: retrospective analysis to evaluate intra-operator reliability of the tools and inter-operator repeatability using the torsion bottle.
For the first and the second part of the study, 35 subjects were measured.
The goal of the first experiment was to evaluate the reliability of the torsion bottle to identify all individuals who experienced a thoracic or lumbar prominence equal or greater than 7°.
The secondary aim was to verify the reliability of blinded inter-operator assessments, performed with the torsion bottle by two physiotherapists on the same patients.

Results

The reliability of the assessments of the torsion bottle has been performed with the Kappa statistic to evaluate the measurement agreement.
The results have shown that the intra-operator reliability of the tool is very high between the measurements collected with the scoliometer® and those collected with the torsion bottle (kappa = 0.9278; standard error = 0.7094).
The data of the second part of the study show that the inter-operator reliability is good (kappa = 0.7988; standard error 0.1368).

Conclusion

The collected data showed that the torsion bottle revealed itself as an efficient tool to execute a basic screening to identify the presence of a prominence in a significant group of adolescents.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Negrini S, et al. Italian guidelines on rehabilitation treatment of adolescents with scoliosis or other spinal deformities. Eura Medicophys. 2005;41(2):183–201.PubMed Negrini S, et al. Italian guidelines on rehabilitation treatment of adolescents with scoliosis or other spinal deformities. Eura Medicophys. 2005;41(2):183–201.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Zaina F, et al. Clinical evaluation of scoliosis during growth: description and reliability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:125–38.PubMed Zaina F, et al. Clinical evaluation of scoliosis during growth: description and reliability. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:125–38.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Parent EC, et al. Identifying the best surface topography parameters for detecting idiopathic scoliosis curve progression. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;158:78–82.PubMed Parent EC, et al. Identifying the best surface topography parameters for detecting idiopathic scoliosis curve progression. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;158:78–82.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Aulisa AG, et al. Correlation between hump dimensions and curve severity in idiopathic scoliosis before and after conservative treatment Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(2):114-119. Aulisa AG, et al. Correlation between hump dimensions and curve severity in idiopathic scoliosis before and after conservative treatment Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(2):114-119.
7.
go back to reference Ferraro C, et al. Hump height in idiopathic scoliosis measured using a humpmeter in growing subjects: relationship between the hump height and the Cobb angle and the effect of age on the hump height. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(3):377-389. Ferraro C, et al. Hump height in idiopathic scoliosis measured using a humpmeter in growing subjects: relationship between the hump height and the Cobb angle and the effect of age on the hump height. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(3):377-389.
8.
go back to reference Amendt LE, et al. Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer®. Phys Ther. 1990;70(2):108–17.CrossRefPubMed Amendt LE, et al. Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer®. Phys Ther. 1990;70(2):108–17.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Murrell GA, et al. An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer®. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(6):709–12.CrossRef Murrell GA, et al. An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer®. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(6):709–12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Côté P, Kreitz B, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the scoliometer® and Adam’s forward bend test. Spine 1998; 1;23(7):796-802. Côté P, Kreitz B, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the scoliometer® and Adam’s forward bend test. Spine 1998; 1;23(7):796-802.
Metadata
Title
Torsion bottle, a very simple, reliable, and cheap tool for a basic scoliosis screening
Authors
Michele Romano
Matteo Mastrantonio
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2397-1789
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-018-0150-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 1/2018 Go to the issue