Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Letter to the Editor

Supplementary Addendum to “Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” Winner in Imaging Research”

Authors: Steve C. N. Hui, Winnie C. W. Chu

Published in: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Regarding the publication entitle “Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” Winner in Imaging Research” in Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, we would like to provide more details to readers about the dose calculated by simulation using PCXMC 2.0. In this study, the data and results are correct based on the given parameters and calculation provided in the manuscript. In the simulation of EOS micro-dose, only a 0.1 mm copper filter was applied. We agree with the suggestion from Dr. Pedersen and colleagues that the inclusion of a 1.5 mm aluminum filter together with the 0.1 mm copper reflects more realistic representation of X-ray filtration which would improve the accuracy of the simulation. We believe that this supplementary addendum would be beneficial to other researchers who are planning to conduct a similar study.
Metadata
Title
Supplementary Addendum to “Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” Winner in Imaging Research”
Authors
Steve C. N. Hui
Winnie C. W. Chu
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2397-1789
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0148-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 1/2018 Go to the issue