Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Feasibility and acceptability of two incentive-based implementation strategies for mental health therapists implementing cognitive-behavioral therapy: a pilot study to inform a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Rinad S. Beidas, Emily M. Becker-Haimes, Danielle R. Adams, Laura Skriner, Rebecca E. Stewart, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Alison M. Buttenheim, Nathaniel J. Williams, Patricia Inacker, Elizabeth Richey, Steven C. Marcus

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Informed by our prior work indicating that therapists do not feel recognized or rewarded for implementation of evidence-based practices, we tested the feasibility and acceptability of two incentive-based implementation strategies that seek to improve therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth, an evidence-based practice.

Methods

This study was conducted over 6 weeks in two community mental health agencies with therapists (n = 11) and leaders (n = 4). Therapists were randomized to receive either a financial or social incentive if they achieved a predetermined criterion on adherence to cognitive-behavioral therapy. In the first intervention period (block 1; 2 weeks), therapists received the reward they were initially randomized to if they achieved criterion. In the second intervention period (block 2; 2 weeks), therapists received both rewards if they achieved criterion. Therapists recorded 41 sessions across 15 unique clients over the project period. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility was assessed quantitatively. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with therapists and leaders to assess acceptability. Difference in therapist adherence by condition was examined as an exploratory outcome. Adherence ratings were ascertained using an established and validated observational coding system of cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Results

Both implementation strategies were feasible and acceptable—however, modifications to study design for the larger trial will be necessary based on participant feedback. With respect to our exploratory analysis, we found a trend suggesting the financial reward may have had a more robust effect on therapist adherence than the social reward.

Conclusions

Incentive-based implementation strategies can be feasibly administered in community mental health agencies with good acceptability, although iterative pilot work is essential. Larger, fully powered trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of implementation strategies to incentivize and enhance therapists’ adherence to evidence-based practices such as cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
10.
go back to reference Beidas RS, Stewart RE, Adams DR, Fernandez T, Lustbader S, Powell BJ, et al. A multi-level examination of stakeholder perspectives of implementation of evidence-based practices in a large urban publicly-funded mental health system. Adm Policy Ment Hlth. 2016;43(6):893–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0705-2.CrossRef Beidas RS, Stewart RE, Adams DR, Fernandez T, Lustbader S, Powell BJ, et al. A multi-level examination of stakeholder perspectives of implementation of evidence-based practices in a large urban publicly-funded mental health system. Adm Policy Ment Hlth. 2016;43(6):893–908. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10488-015-0705-2.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Emanuel EJ, Ubel PA, Kessler JB, Meyer G, Muller RW, Navathe AS, et al. Using behavioral economics to design physician incentives that deliver high-value care behavioral economics, physician incentives, and high-value care. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(2):114–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1330.CrossRefPubMed Emanuel EJ, Ubel PA, Kessler JB, Meyer G, Muller RW, Navathe AS, et al. Using behavioral economics to design physician incentives that deliver high-value care behavioral economics, physician incentives, and high-value care. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(2):114–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​M15-1330.CrossRefPubMed
20.
22.
26.
go back to reference Navathe AS, Sen AP, Rosenthal MB, Pearl RM, Ubel PA, Emanuel EJ, et al. New strategies for aligning physicians with health system incentives. Am J Manag C. 2016;22(9):610. Navathe AS, Sen AP, Rosenthal MB, Pearl RM, Ubel PA, Emanuel EJ, et al. New strategies for aligning physicians with health system incentives. Am J Manag C. 2016;22(9):610.
31.
go back to reference Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Eckshtain D, Ugueto AM, Vaughn-Coaxum R, et al: What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: a multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. Am Psychol 2017;2(72). doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040360. Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Eckshtain D, Ugueto AM, Vaughn-Coaxum R, et al: What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: a multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. Am Psychol 2017;2(72). doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0040360.
34.
go back to reference Read D, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, Keren G, Laibson D. Choice bracketing. In: Fischhoff B, Manski CF, editors. Elicitation of preferences. Norwell, MA: Springer; 1999. p. 171–202.CrossRef Read D, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, Keren G, Laibson D. Choice bracketing. In: Fischhoff B, Manski CF, editors. Elicitation of preferences. Norwell, MA: Springer; 1999. p. 171–202.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference McLeod BD, Smith MM, Southam-Gerow MA, Weisz JR, Kendall PC. Measuring treatment differentiation for implementation research: The Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies scale. Psychol Assessment. 2015;27(1):314. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000037.CrossRef McLeod BD, Smith MM, Southam-Gerow MA, Weisz JR, Kendall PC. Measuring treatment differentiation for implementation research: The Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies scale. Psychol Assessment. 2015;27(1):314. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​pas0000037.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Eisenberg D, Druss BG. Time preferences, mental health and treatment utilization. J Ment Health Policy. 2015;18(3):125–36. Eisenberg D, Druss BG. Time preferences, mental health and treatment utilization. J Ment Health Policy. 2015;18(3):125–36.
46.
go back to reference Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68.CrossRefPubMed Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Williams NJ, Glisson C. The role of organizational culture and climate in the dissemination and implementation of empirically supported treatments for youth. In: Beidas RS, Kendall PC, editors. Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices in child and adolescent mental health; 2014. p. 61–81. Williams NJ, Glisson C. The role of organizational culture and climate in the dissemination and implementation of empirically supported treatments for youth. In: Beidas RS, Kendall PC, editors. Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices in child and adolescent mental health; 2014. p. 61–81.
65.
go back to reference Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350–83.CrossRef Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350–83.CrossRef
66.
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and acceptability of two incentive-based implementation strategies for mental health therapists implementing cognitive-behavioral therapy: a pilot study to inform a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Rinad S. Beidas
Emily M. Becker-Haimes
Danielle R. Adams
Laura Skriner
Rebecca E. Stewart
Courtney Benjamin Wolk
Alison M. Buttenheim
Nathaniel J. Williams
Patricia Inacker
Elizabeth Richey
Steven C. Marcus
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0684-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Implementation Science 1/2017 Go to the issue