Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Systematic review

The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review

Authors: Dylan Kneale, Antonio Rojas-García, Rosalind Raine, James Thomas

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the “health” boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers’ evidence needs is essential.

Methods

We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data.

Results

From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability.

Conclusions

There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201.CrossRefPubMed Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Office of Tobacco Control. Guidance for Employers and Managers: Public Health (Tobacco) Acts 2002 and 2004 Section 47 - Smoking Prohibitions. Clane, Co Kildare: Office of Tobacco Control; 2004. Office of Tobacco Control. Guidance for Employers and Managers: Public Health (Tobacco) Acts 2002 and 2004 Section 47 - Smoking Prohibitions. Clane, Co Kildare: Office of Tobacco Control; 2004.
4.
go back to reference Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D, Hastings G, McNeill A, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15 suppl 3:iii51–iii8.PubMedPubMedCentral Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D, Hastings G, McNeill A, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15 suppl 3:iii51–iii8.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Allwright S, McLaughlin P, Murphy D. A report on the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the workplace, Health and Safety Authority, Office of Tobacco Control, Ireland 2002. Allwright S, McLaughlin P, Murphy D. A report on the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the workplace, Health and Safety Authority, Office of Tobacco Control, Ireland 2002.
6.
go back to reference Bonell C, Jamal F, Melendez-Torres GJ, Cummins S. “Dark logic”: theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;69(1):95–8.CrossRefPubMed Bonell C, Jamal F, Melendez-Torres GJ, Cummins S. “Dark logic”: theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;69(1):95–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lorenc T, Oliver K. Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;68(38):288–90. Lorenc T, Oliver K. Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;68(38):288–90.
8.
9.
go back to reference Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(2):119–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(2):119–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Pentland D, Forsyth K, Maciver D, Walsh M, Murray R, Irvine L, et al. Key characteristics of knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare: integrative literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(7):1408–25.CrossRefPubMed Pentland D, Forsyth K, Maciver D, Walsh M, Murray R, Irvine L, et al. Key characteristics of knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare: integrative literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(7):1408–25.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.CrossRefPubMed Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Department of Health. Public Health in Local Government: Commissioning Responsibilities. London: Department of Health; 2011. Department of Health. Public Health in Local Government: Commissioning Responsibilities. London: Department of Health; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Buck D, Gregory S. Improving the public’s health: A resource for local authorities. London: The King's Fund; 2013. Buck D, Gregory S. Improving the public’s health: A resource for local authorities. London: The King's Fund; 2013.
14.
go back to reference Marks L, Hunter D, Scalabrini S, Gray J, McCafferty S, Payne N, et al. The return of public health to local government in England: changing the parameters of the public health prioritization debate? Public Health. 2015;129(9):1194–203.CrossRefPubMed Marks L, Hunter D, Scalabrini S, Gray J, McCafferty S, Payne N, et al. The return of public health to local government in England: changing the parameters of the public health prioritization debate? Public Health. 2015;129(9):1194–203.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Public Health England. Immunisation & Screening National Delivery Framework & Local Operating Model. London: Public Health England/NHS England; 2013. Public Health England. Immunisation & Screening National Delivery Framework & Local Operating Model. London: Public Health England/NHS England; 2013.
16.
go back to reference Royal Society for Public Health. The Views of Public Health Teams Working in Local Authorities Year 1. London: Royal Society for Public Health; 2014. Royal Society for Public Health. The Views of Public Health Teams Working in Local Authorities Year 1. London: Royal Society for Public Health; 2014.
17.
go back to reference House of Commons. The Balance of Power: Central and Local Government. London: House of Commons; 2009. House of Commons. The Balance of Power: Central and Local Government. London: House of Commons; 2009.
18.
go back to reference Beenstock J, Sowden S, Hunter DJ, White M. Are health and well-being strategies in England fit for purpose? A thematic content analysis. J Public Health. 2014;37(3):461–9. Beenstock J, Sowden S, Hunter DJ, White M. Are health and well-being strategies in England fit for purpose? A thematic content analysis. J Public Health. 2014;37(3):461–9.
19.
go back to reference The King's Fund. House of Commons Health Committee inquiry on public health post-2013: structures, organisation, funding and delivery. London: The King's Fund; 2015. The King's Fund. House of Commons Health Committee inquiry on public health post-2013: structures, organisation, funding and delivery. London: The King's Fund; 2015.
20.
go back to reference Lambert MF, Sowden S. Revisiting the risks associated with health and healthcare reform in England: perspective of Faculty of Public Health members. J Public Health. 2016;38(4):e438–e445. Lambert MF, Sowden S. Revisiting the risks associated with health and healthcare reform in England: perspective of Faculty of Public Health members. J Public Health. 2016;38(4):e438–e445.
21.
go back to reference Gorsky M, Lock K, Hogarth S. Public health and English local government: historical perspectives on the impact of ‘returning home’. J Public Health. 2014;36(4):546–51.CrossRef Gorsky M, Lock K, Hogarth S. Public health and English local government: historical perspectives on the impact of ‘returning home’. J Public Health. 2014;36(4):546–51.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lorenc T, Tyner EF, Petticrew M, Duffy S, Martineau FP, Phillips G, et al. Cultures of evidence across policy sectors: systematic review of qualitative evidence. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(6):1041–7.CrossRefPubMed Lorenc T, Tyner EF, Petticrew M, Duffy S, Martineau FP, Phillips G, et al. Cultures of evidence across policy sectors: systematic review of qualitative evidence. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(6):1041–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference de Leeuw E. From research to policy and practice in public health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Public Health: Local and Global Perspectives. Port Melbourne, Australia; Cambridge University Press. 2016. p. 213. de Leeuw E. From research to policy and practice in public health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Public Health: Local and Global Perspectives. Port Melbourne, Australia; Cambridge University Press. 2016. p. 213.
27.
go back to reference Fafard P. Beyond the usual suspects: Using political science to enhance public health policy making. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(11):1129–32. Fafard P. Beyond the usual suspects: Using political science to enhance public health policy making. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(11):1129–32.
28.
go back to reference Smith K. Beyond evidence based policy in public health: The interplay of ideas. Basingstoke, Hampshire UK: PalgraveMacmillan; 2013. Smith K. Beyond evidence based policy in public health: The interplay of ideas. Basingstoke, Hampshire UK: PalgraveMacmillan; 2013.
29.
go back to reference Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Katikireddi SV, Bond L, Hilton S. Perspectives on econometric modelling to inform policy: a UK qualitative case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24:490–5. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt206. Epub 2013 Dec 23.CrossRefPubMed Katikireddi SV, Bond L, Hilton S. Perspectives on econometric modelling to inform policy: a UK qualitative case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24:490–5. doi:10.​1093/​eurpub/​ckt206. Epub 2013 Dec 23.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Katikireddi SV, Higgins M, Bond L, Bonell C, Macintyre S. How evidence based is English public health policy? Br Med J. 2011;343:d7310.CrossRef Katikireddi SV, Higgins M, Bond L, Bonell C, Macintyre S. How evidence based is English public health policy? Br Med J. 2011;343:d7310.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S. EPPI-Reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. London: Institute of Education; 2010. Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S. EPPI-Reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. London: Institute of Education; 2010.
34.
go back to reference McGill E, Egan M, Petticrew M, Mountford L, Milton S, Whitehead M, et al. Trading quality for relevance: Non-health decision-makers' use of evidence on the social determinants of health. BMJ Open. 2015;5. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007053. McGill E, Egan M, Petticrew M, Mountford L, Milton S, Whitehead M, et al. Trading quality for relevance: Non-health decision-makers' use of evidence on the social determinants of health. BMJ Open. 2015;5. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007053.
35.
go back to reference Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1.CrossRef Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):1.CrossRef Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):1.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Snilstveit B, Oliver S, Vojtkova M. Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice. J Dev Effect. 2012;4(3):409–29.CrossRef Snilstveit B, Oliver S, Vojtkova M. Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice. J Dev Effect. 2012;4(3):409–29.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):1.CrossRef Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):1.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Wye L, Brangan E, Cameron A, Gabbay J, Klein J, Pope C. Knowledge exchange in health-care commissioning. Knowledge exchange in health-care commissioning: case studies of the use of commercial, not-for-profit and public sector agencies, 2011-14. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015. Wye L, Brangan E, Cameron A, Gabbay J, Klein J, Pope C. Knowledge exchange in health-care commissioning. Knowledge exchange in health-care commissioning: case studies of the use of commercial, not-for-profit and public sector agencies, 2011-14. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015.
42.
go back to reference Oliver K, de Vocht F. Defining ‘evidence’ in public health: a survey of policymakers’ uses and preferences. Eur J Public Health. 2015. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckv082. Oliver K, de Vocht F. Defining ‘evidence’ in public health: a survey of policymakers’ uses and preferences. Eur J Public Health. 2015. doi:10.​1093/​eurpub/​ckv082.
43.
go back to reference Blackman T, Harrington B, Elliott E, Greene A, Hunter DJ, Marks L, et al. Framing health inequalities for local intervention: comparative case studies. Sociol Health Illn. 2012;34(1):49–63.CrossRefPubMed Blackman T, Harrington B, Elliott E, Greene A, Hunter DJ, Marks L, et al. Framing health inequalities for local intervention: comparative case studies. Sociol Health Illn. 2012;34(1):49–63.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Peckham S, Gadsby E, Coleman A, Segar J, Perkins N, Jenkins L, et al. PHOENIX: Public Health and Obesity in England–the New Infrastructure examined. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2015. Peckham S, Gadsby E, Coleman A, Segar J, Perkins N, Jenkins L, et al. PHOENIX: Public Health and Obesity in England–the New Infrastructure examined. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2015.
46.
go back to reference Clarke A, Taylor-Phillips S, Swan J, Gkeredakis E, Mills P, Powell J, et al. Evidence-based commissioning in the English NHS: who uses which sources of evidence? A survey 2010/2011. BMJ Open. 2013;3. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002714. Clarke A, Taylor-Phillips S, Swan J, Gkeredakis E, Mills P, Powell J, et al. Evidence-based commissioning in the English NHS: who uses which sources of evidence? A survey 2010/2011. BMJ Open. 2013;3. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002714.
47.
go back to reference Hunter D, Marks L, Brown J, Scalabrini S, Salway S, Vale L, et al. The potential value of priority-setting methods in public health investment decisions: qualitative findings from three English local authorities. Critical Public Health. 2016;26(5):578–87. Hunter D, Marks L, Brown J, Scalabrini S, Salway S, Vale L, et al. The potential value of priority-setting methods in public health investment decisions: qualitative findings from three English local authorities. Critical Public Health. 2016;26(5):578–87.
49.
go back to reference Willmott M, Womack J, Hollingworth W, Campbell R. Making the case for investment in public health: experiences of Directors of Public Health in English local government. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv035. Willmott M, Womack J, Hollingworth W, Campbell R. Making the case for investment in public health: experiences of Directors of Public Health in English local government. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015. doi:10.​1093/​pubmed/​fdv035.
50.
go back to reference Oliver K, De Vocht F, Money A, Everett M. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses. J Public Health (United Kingdom). 2013;35:453–9. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdt039.CrossRef Oliver K, De Vocht F, Money A, Everett M. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses. J Public Health (United Kingdom). 2013;35:453–9. doi:10.​1093/​pubmed/​fdt039.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Orton LC, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson DC, Moonan M, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S. Prioritising public health: A qualitative study of decision making to reduce health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2011;11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-821. Orton LC, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson DC, Moonan M, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S. Prioritising public health: A qualitative study of decision making to reduce health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2011;11. doi: 10.​1186/​1471-2458-11-821.
55.
go back to reference Marsh K, Dolan P, Kempster J, Lugon M. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35:460–6. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fds099. Epub 2012 Dec 14.CrossRef Marsh K, Dolan P, Kempster J, Lugon M. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35:460–6. doi:10.​1093/​pubmed/​fds099. Epub 2012 Dec 14.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181(3-4):165–8.CrossRef Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181(3-4):165–8.CrossRef
58.
59.
go back to reference Blackman T, Wistow J, Byrne D. A qualitative comparative analysis of factors associated with trends in narrowing health inequalities in England. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(12):1965–74.CrossRefPubMed Blackman T, Wistow J, Byrne D. A qualitative comparative analysis of factors associated with trends in narrowing health inequalities in England. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(12):1965–74.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
63.
go back to reference Qureshi K. It's not just pills and potions? Depoliticising health inequalities policy in England. Anthropol Med. 2013;20(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed Qureshi K. It's not just pills and potions? Depoliticising health inequalities policy in England. Anthropol Med. 2013;20(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference NHS. Commissioning fact sheet for clinical commissioning groups. London: NHS England; 2012. NHS. Commissioning fact sheet for clinical commissioning groups. London: NHS England; 2012.
65.
go back to reference Coleman A, Checkland K, Segar J, McDermott I, Harrison S, Peckham S. Joining it up? Health and wellbeing boards in English local governance: evidence from clinical commissioning groups and shadow health and wellbeing boards. Local Government Studies. 2014;40(4):560–80.CrossRef Coleman A, Checkland K, Segar J, McDermott I, Harrison S, Peckham S. Joining it up? Health and wellbeing boards in English local governance: evidence from clinical commissioning groups and shadow health and wellbeing boards. Local Government Studies. 2014;40(4):560–80.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Jenkins LM, Bramwell D, Coleman A, Gadsby EW, Peckham S, Perkins N, et al. Integration, influence and change in public health: findings from a survey of Directors of Public Health in England. J Public Health. 2015;38(3)::e201–e208. Jenkins LM, Bramwell D, Coleman A, Gadsby EW, Peckham S, Perkins N, et al. Integration, influence and change in public health: findings from a survey of Directors of Public Health in England. J Public Health. 2015;38(3)::e201–e208.
Metadata
Title
The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review
Authors
Dylan Kneale
Antonio Rojas-García
Rosalind Raine
James Thomas
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Implementation Science 1/2017 Go to the issue