Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Implementation Science
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Planning to be routine: habit as a mediator of the planning-behaviour relationship in healthcare professionals

Authors: Sebastian Potthoff, Justin Presseau, Falko F. Sniehotta, Marie Johnston, Marko Elovainio, Leah Avery

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gaps in the quality of care provided to people with type 2 diabetes are regularly identified. Healthcare professionals often have a strong intention to follow practice guidelines during consultations with people with type 2 diabetes; however, this intention does not always translate into action. Action planning (planning when, where and how to act) and coping planning (planning how to overcome pre-identified barriers) have been hypothesised to help with the enactment of intentions by creating mental cue-response links that promote habit formation. This study aimed to investigate whether habit helps to better understand how action and coping planning relate to clinical behaviour in the context of type 2 diabetes care.

Methods

The study utilised a prospective correlational design with six nested sub-studies. General practitioners and practice nurses (n = 427 from 99 UK primary care practices) completed measures of action planning, coping planning and habit at baseline and then self-reported their enactment of guideline-recommended advising, prescribing and examining behaviours 12 months later. Bootstrapped mediation analyses were used to test the indirect effect of action and coping planning on healthcare professionals’ clinical behaviour via their relationship with habit.

Results

Healthcare professionals who reported higher degrees of action or coping planning for performing six guideline recommended behaviours in the context of type 2 diabetes care were more likely to report performing these behaviours in clinical practice. All 12 bootstrapped mediation analyses showed that the positive relationship between planning (action and coping planning) and healthcare professionals’ clinical behaviour operated indirectly through habit.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that habit mediates the relationship between planning (action and coping planning) and healthcare professional behaviour. Promoting careful action and coping planning may support routinised uptake of guideline-recommended care by healthcare professionals in the primary care setting. Given the competing demands on healthcare professionals, exploring the behavioural processes involved in promoting more routinisation of behaviours where possible and appropriate could free up cognitive capacity for clinical behaviours that rely on more deliberation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Holden SH, Barnett AH, Peters JR, Jenkins-Jones S, Poole CD, Morgan CL, et al. The incidence of type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom from 1991 to 2010. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(9):844–52. doi:10.​1111/​dom.​12123.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Chen L, Magliano DJ, Zimmet PZ. The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus—present and future perspectives. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(4):228–36.CrossRef
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
4.
HSCIC. National diabetes audit 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Report 1:care processes and treatment targets. Leeds: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2016.
5.
Lim EL, Hollingsworth KG, Aribisala BS, Chen MJ, Mathers JC, Taylor R. Reversal of type 2 diabetes: normalisation of beta cell function in association with decreased pancreas and liver triacylglycerol. Diabetologia. 2011;54(10):2506–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
NICE. Type 2 diabetes: the management of type 2 diabetes, NICE clinical guidelines 87 [NHS evidence accredited]. 2009.
7.
Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:105–6.CrossRef
8.
Wherrett D, Huot C, Mitchell B, Pacaud D. Canadian diabetes association 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: type I diabetes in children and adolescents. Can J Diab. 2013;37:153–162.
9.
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. General practice management of type 2 diabetes: 2016–18. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2016.
10.
Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39:1146–54.CrossRef
11.
Presseau J, Hawthorne G, Sniehotta FF, Steen N, Francis JJ, Johnston M, et al. Improving Diabetes care through Examining, Advising, and prescribing (IDEA): protocol for a theory-based cluster randomised controlled trial of a multiple behaviour change intervention aimed at primary healthcare professionals. Implement Sci. 2014;9:61. doi:10.​1186/​1748-5908-9-61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
13.
14.
15.
Epstein S. Cognitive-experiential self-theory. Theory and research. In: Pervin LA, editor. Handbook of personality. New York: Guilford; 1990. p. 165–92.
16.
17.
Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(3):220–47.CrossRef
18.
Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RC, Sher KJ, et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;86(2):263–83. doi:10.​1016/​j.​pbb.​2006.​09.​021.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Nilsen P, Roback K, Broström A, Ellström P-E. Creatures of habit: accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change. Implement Sci. 2012;7(53):153–162.
21.
Presseau J, Johnston M, Heponiemi T, Elovainio M, Francis JJ, Eccles MP, et al. Reflective and automatic processes in health care professional behaviour: a dual process model tested across multiple behaviours. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(3):347–58. doi:10.​1007/​s12160-014-9609-8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Sniehotta FF, Presseau J. The habitual use of the self-report habit index. Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. 2012;43(1):139–40. doi:10.​1007/​s12160-011-9305-x. author reply 41-2.CrossRef
24.
25.
Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010;40(6):998–1009. doi:10.​1002/​ejsp.​674.CrossRef
26.
Wood W, Neal DT. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychol Rev. 2007;114(4):843–63.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Phillips LA, Gardner B. Habitual exercise instigation (vs. execution) predicts healthy adults’ exercise frequency. Health Psychol. 2016;35(1):69.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Sheeran P, Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA. Nonconscious processes and health. Health Psychol. 2013;32(5):460.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schuez B. Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Scial Psychol. 2005;35:565–76. doi:10.​1002/​ejsp.​258.CrossRef
31.
Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999;54:493–503.CrossRef
32.
33.
Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health. 2005;20(2):143–60. doi:10.​1080/​0887044051233131​7670.CrossRef
34.
Casper ES. Using implementation intentions to teach practitioners: changing practice behaviours via continuing education. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(7):748–52.CrossRef
35.
36.
37.
Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis JJ, Stamp E, Johnston M, Hawthorne G, et al. Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study. Implement Sci. 2011;6:61. doi:10.​1186/​1748-5908-6-61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis JJ, Stamp E, Johnston M, Hawthorne G, et al. Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1.CrossRef
39.
Walker AE, Grimshaw J, Johnston M, Pitts N, Steen N, Eccles M. PRIME-PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntaion research: selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2003;3:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;33(6):1313–30.CrossRef
41.
42.
Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–20.CrossRef
43.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distingtion in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhart S, editor. Sociological methodology 1982. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1982. p. 290–312.
45.
Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
46.
MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:83–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav Res. 2004;39:99–128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strateies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):879–91.
49.
Presseau J, Johnston M, Heponiemi T, Elovainio M, Francis JJ, Eccles MP, et al. Reflective and automatic processes in health care professional behaviour: a dual process model tested across multiple behaviours. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(3):347–58.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Deutsch R, Strack F. Duality models in social psychology: from dual processes to interacting systems. Psychol Inq. 2006;17(3):166–72.CrossRef
51.
Bargh JA. The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer RS, Srull TK, editors. Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994. p. 1–40.
52.
53.
Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expect. 2001;4:58–70.
54.
Cook JV, Dickinson HO, Eccles MP. Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):1.CrossRef
55.
Metadata
Title
Planning to be routine: habit as a mediator of the planning-behaviour relationship in healthcare professionals
Authors
Sebastian Potthoff
Justin Presseau
Falko F. Sniehotta
Marie Johnston
Marko Elovainio
Leah Avery
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0551-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Implementation Science 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy

Research

Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation (OR4KT) questionnaire

Research

The association between implementation strategy use and the uptake of hepatitis C treatment in a national sample

Study protocol

Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project)

Systematic review

Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review

Debate

Architectural frameworks: defining the structures for implementing learning health systems