Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Implementation Science
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Systematic review

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review

Authors: Dawn V. Ernstzen, Quinette A. Louw, Susan L. Hillier

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Up-to-date, high quality, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that are applicable for primary healthcare are vital to optimize services for the population with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP). The study aimed to systematically identify and appraise the available evidence-based CPGs for the management of CMSP in adults presenting in primary healthcare settings.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted. Twelve guideline clearinghouses and six electronic databases were searched for eligible CPGs published between the years 2000 and May 2015. CPGs meeting the inclusion criteria were appraised by three reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II.

Results

Of the 1082 records identified, 34 were eligible, and 12 CPGs were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological rigor of CPG development was highly variable, and the median domain score was 66%. The median score for stakeholder involvement was 64%. The lowest median score was obtained for the domain applicability (48%). There was inconsistent use of frameworks to aggregate the level of evidence and the strength of the recommendation in the included CPGs. The scope and content of the included CPGs focussed on opioid prescription.

Conclusion

Numerous CPGs that are applicable for the primary healthcare of CMSP exists, varying in their scope and methodological quality. This study highlights specific elements to enhance the development and reporting of CPGs, which may play a role in the uptake of guidelines into clinical practice. These elements include enhanced reporting of methodological aspects, the use of frameworks to enhance decision making processes, the inclusion of patient preferences and values, and the consideration of factors influencing applicability of recommendations.

Trial registration

PROSPERO CRD42015022098.

Literature
  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Normative guidelines on pain management: Report of a Delphi Study to determine the need for guidelines and to identify the number and topics of guidelines that should be developed by WHO. Geneva: WHO; 2007. http://​www.​readbag.​com/​who-medicines-areas-quality-safety-delphi-study-pain-guidelines. Accessed 13 Apr 2016.
  2. Foster NE, Pincus T, Underwood MR, Vogel S, Breen A, Harding G. Understanding the care for musculoskeletal conditions – why a biomedical process is inadequate. Rheumatology. 2003;42:401–3.PubMed
  3. Smith BH, Hopton JL, Chambers WA. Chronic pain in primary care. Fam Pract. 1999;16(5):475–82.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Rauf WN, Meyer HP, Marcus TS, Becker PJ. The impact of chronic pain on the quality of life of patients attending primary healthcare clinics. S Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2014;20(2):122–6.
  5. Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, Sprott H. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology. 2008;47(5):670–8.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Harstall C, Ospina M. How prevalent is chronic pain? Pain Clin Update. 2003;11:1–4.View Article
  7. Schnitzer TJ. Update on guidelines for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25 Suppl 1:S22–9. doi:10.​1007/​s10067-006-0203-8.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Gureje O, Von Korff M, Simon GE, Gater R. Persistent pain and well-being. A World Health Organization study in primary care. JAMA. 1998;280(2):147–51. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​280.​2.​147.View ArticlePubMed
  9. World Health Organisation. Primary health care – Now more than ever. 2008. http://​www.​who.​int/​whr/​2008/​en/​. Accessed Sept 2012.
  10. Stein C, Reinecke H, Sorgatz H. Opioid use in chronic non-cancer pain: guidelines revisited. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:598–601. doi:10.​1097/​ACO.​0b013e32833c57a8​.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Rauf WN, Meyer HP, Marcus TS, Becker PJ. Prevalence of chronic pain in patients attending primary healthcare facilities in South-West Tshwane. S Afr Fam Pract. 2013;55(1):85–9.View Article
  12. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6:26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  13. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. National Academy of Sciences. 2011. https://​www.​nationalacademie​s.​org/​hmd/​Reports/​2011/​Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-We-Can-Trust.​aspx. Accessed 21 May 2015.
  14. Chou R. Using evidence in pain practice: part II using evidence in pain practice. Pain Med. 2008;14(9):531–41.
  15. Shekelle P, Woolf S, Grimshaw JM, Schünemann HJ, Eccles MP. Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development. Implement Sci. 2012;7:62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  16. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281(20):1900–5.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Graham ID, Harrison M, Brouwers M, Davies BL, Dunn S. Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: evaluating and adapting clinical practice guidelines for local use by health care organisations. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31:599–611. doi:10.​1177/​088421702237744.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D. A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(3):235–42.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Harrison MB, Legare F, Graham ID, Fervers B. Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. CMAJ. 2010;182(2):e78–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  20. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschlager G, Philips S, Van der Wees P. On behalf of the Board of trustees of the Guidelines International Network. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):525–32.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:20.View Article
  22. Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Hanna S, Littlejohns P, Makarski J. Zitzelsberger L for the AGREE Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. CMAJ. 2010;182:E839–842. doi:10.​1503/​090449.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  23. Gonzalez-Suarez C, Grimmer-Somers K, Dizon J, King E, Lorenzo S, Valdecanas C, Gambito E, Fidel B. Contextualizing Western guidelines for stroke and low back pain to a developing country (Philippines): an innovative approach to putting evidence into practice efficiently. J Healthc Leadersh. 2012;4:141–56.View Article
  24. ADAPTE II Collaboration. 2009. http://​www.​g-i-n.​net/​document-store/​working-groups-documents/​adaptation/​adapte-resource-toolkit-guideline-adaptation-2-0.​pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2014.
  25. Next Steps Consortium AGREE. The AGREE II Instrument. 2013. http://​www.​agreetrust.​org. Accessed 15 Aug 2014.
  26. Kredo T, Gerritsen A, Van Heerden J, Conway S, Siegfried N. Clinical practice guidelines within the Southern African development community: a descriptive study of the quality of guideline development and concordance with best evidence for five priority diseases. Health Res Pol Syst. 2012;10(1).
  27. Furlan AD, Reardon R, Weppler C. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a new Canadian practice guideline. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:923–30.View Article
  28. Kahan M, Mailis-Gagnon A, Wilson L, Srivastava A. Canadian guideline for safe and effective use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain cinical summary for family physicians. Part 1: general population. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57:1257–66.PubMedPubMed Central
  29. Cheung CW, Qiu Q, Choi S, Moore B, Goucke R, Irwin M. Chronic opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain: a review and comparison of treatment guidelines. Pain Physician. 2014;17:402–14.
  30. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of chronic pain. Edinburgh: SIGN publication no. 136; 2013. http://​sign.​ac.​uk/​guidelines/​fulltext/​136/​index.​html. Accessed 13 Apr 2016.
  31. Hooten WM, Timming R, Belgrade M, Gaul J, Goertz M, et al. for the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. In: Assessment and Management of Chronic Pain. 2013.
  32. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO). Assessment and Management of Pain. 3rd ed. Toronto: Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario; 2013. http://​rnao.​ca/​bpg/​guidelines/​assessment-and-management-pain. Accessed 13 Apr 2016.
  33. Sanders SH, Harden NR, Vicente PJ. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for interdisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients. Pain Prac. 2005;4(5):303–15.View Article
  34. Misso ML, Pitt VJ, Jones KM, Barnes HN, Piterman L, Green SE. Quality and consistency of CPG for diagnosis and management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a descriptive overview of published guidelines. MJA. 2008;189(7):394–9.PubMed
  35. Vernooij RWM, Sanabria AJ, Solà I, Alonso-Coello P, Martínez GL. Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks. Implement Sci. 2014;9:3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  36. Woolf SH, Schünemann HJ, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci. 2012;7:61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  37. Hillier S, Grimmer-Somers K, Merlin T, Middleton P, Salisbury J, Tooher R, Weston A. FORM: an Australian method for grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  38. Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M, Treweek S, Mustafa RA, Vandvik PO, Meerpohl J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ. the GRADE Working Group. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;353:i2089. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​i2089.View ArticlePubMed
  39. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300(4):436–8.View ArticlePubMed
  40. Dizon JM, Machingaidze S, Grimmer K. To adopt, to adapt, or to contextualise? The big question in clinical practice guideline development. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:442.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  41. Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, Balog CC, et al. American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines for responsible opioid prescribing in chronic non-cancer pain: Part I – evidence assessment Part 2 – Guidance. Pain Physician. 2012;15(Suppl S1-S66):S67–S116.PubMed
  42. National Opioid Use Guideline Group (NOUGG). Canadian guideline for safe and effective use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain Part A: executive summary and background Part B: Recommendations for practice. 2010. http://​nationalpaincent​re.​mcmaster.​ca/​opioid/​. Accessed 13 Apr 2016.
  43. University of Michigan Health System. Managing chronic non-terminal pain in adults including prescribing controlled substances. 2011. http://​www.​med.​umich.​edu/​1info/​FHP/​practiceguides/​pain/​pain.​pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2015.
  44. Washington State Agency Medical Directors’ Group. Interagency guideline on opioid dosing for chronic non-cancer pain: an educational aid to improve care and safety with opioid treatment. Olympia (WA): Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. 2010. http://​www.​agencymeddirecto​rs.​wa.​gov/​files/​opioidgdline.​pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2016.
  45. Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, Adler JA, et al. For the American pain society–American academy of pain medicine opioids guidelines panel. Opioid treatment guidelines: clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. J Pain. 2009;10(2):113–30. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jpain.​2008.​10.​008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed Central
  46. Harris GR, Susman JL. Managing musculoskeletal complaints with rehabilitation therapy: summary of the Philadelphia panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on musculoskeletal rehabilitation interventions. J Fam Pract. 2002;51(12):1042–46.PubMed
  47. The Philadelphia Panel Members and Ottawa Methods Group Philadelphia panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions: Overview and Methodology. Phys Ther. 2001;81(10):1629 – 40.
  48. Raff M, Eppel S, Meyer H, Sarembock B, Webb D. South African guideline for the use of chronic opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain. S Afr Med J. 2014;104(1 Suppl 1):78–89. doi:10.​7196/​SAMJ.​7316.
Metadata
Title
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary healthcare: a systematic review
Authors
Dawn V. Ernstzen
Quinette A. Louw
Susan L. Hillier
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0533-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Implementation Science 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

Does access to a demand-led evidence briefing service improve uptake and use of research evidence by health service commissioners? A controlled before and after study

Study protocol

Evaluation of a knowledge transfer scheme to improve policy making and practices in health promotion and disease prevention setting in French regions: a realist study protocol

Study protocol

Test of a workforce development intervention to expand opioid use disorder treatment pharmacotherapy prescribers: protocol for a cluster randomized trial

Research

Random or predictable?: Adoption patterns of chronic care management practices in physician organizations

Systematic review

Pediatric eMental healthcare technologies: a systematic review of implementation foci in research studies, and government and organizational documents

Research

Evaluation of scaling-up of HPV self-collection offered by community health workers at home visits to increase screening among socially vulnerable under-screened women in Jujuy Province, Argentina