Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Study protocol: DEcisions in health Care to Introduce or Diffuse innovations using Evidence (DECIDE)

Authors: Simon Turner, Stephen Morris, Jessica Sheringham, Emma Hudson, Naomi J. Fulop

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A range of evidence informs healthcare decision-making, from formal research findings to ‘soft intelligence’ or local data, as well as practical experience or tacit knowledge. However, cultural and organisational factors often prevent the translation of such evidence into practice. Using a multi-level framework, this project will analyse how interactions between the evidence available and processes at the micro (individual/group) and meso (organisational/system) levels influence decisions to introduce or diffuse innovations in acute and primary care within the National Health Service in the UK.

Methods/design

This study will use a mixed methods design, combining qualitative and quantitative methods, and involves four interdependent work streams: (1) rapid evidence synthesis of relevant literature with stakeholder feedback; (2) in-depth case studies of ‘real-world’ decision-making in acute and primary care; (3) a national survey and discrete choice experiment; and (4) development of guidance for decision-makers and evaluators to support the use of evidence in decision-making.

Discussion

This study will enhance the understanding of decision-makers’ use of diverse forms of evidence. The findings will provide insights into how and why some evidence does inform decisions to introduce healthcare innovations, and why barriers persist in other cases. It will also quantify decision-makers’ preferences, including the ‘tipping point’ of evidence needed to shift stakeholders’ views. Practical guidance will be shared with healthcare decision-makers and evaluators on uses of evidence to enable the introduction and diffusion of innovation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dobbins M, Jack S, Thomas H, Kothari A. Public health decision-makers’ informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4:156–63.CrossRefPubMed Dobbins M, Jack S, Thomas H, Kothari A. Public health decision-makers’ informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4:156–63.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Gabbay J, Le May A. Practice-based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011. Gabbay J, Le May A. Practice-based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011.
4.
go back to reference Cooksey D. A review of UK health research funding. London: HMSO; 2006. Cooksey D. A review of UK health research funding. London: HMSO; 2006.
5.
go back to reference Fulop N, Robert G. Context for successful improvement: evidence review. London: The Health Foundation; 2015. ISBN 978-1-906461-68-3. Fulop N, Robert G. Context for successful improvement: evidence review. London: The Health Foundation; 2015. ISBN 978-1-906461-68-3.
6.
go back to reference Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev. 1999;24:691–710. Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev. 1999;24:691–710.
7.
go back to reference Evans B, Snooks H, Howson H, Davies M. How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Evans B, Snooks H, Howson H, Davies M. How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kyratsis Y, Ahmad R, Hatzaras K, Iwami M, Holmes A. Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in health care. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014. doi:10.3310/hsdr02060. Kyratsis Y, Ahmad R, Hatzaras K, Iwami M, Holmes A. Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in health care. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014. doi:10.​3310/​hsdr02060.
9.
go back to reference Clarke A, Taylor-Phillips S, Swan J, Gkeredakis E, Mills P, Powell J, et al. Evidence-based commissioning in the English NHS: who uses which sources of evidence? A survey 2010/2011. BMJ Open. 2013. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002714. Clarke A, Taylor-Phillips S, Swan J, Gkeredakis E, Mills P, Powell J, et al. Evidence-based commissioning in the English NHS: who uses which sources of evidence? A survey 2010/2011. BMJ Open. 2013. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2013-002714.
10.
go back to reference Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Martin DK. Priority setting at the micro-, meso and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda. Health Policy. 2007;82:78–94.CrossRefPubMed Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Martin DK. Priority setting at the micro-, meso and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda. Health Policy. 2007;82:78–94.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021704. Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0021704.
12.
go back to reference Green J. Epistemology, evidence and experience: evidence based health care in the work of accident alliances. Sociol Health Ill. 2000;22:453–76.CrossRef Green J. Epistemology, evidence and experience: evidence based health care in the work of accident alliances. Sociol Health Ill. 2000;22:453–76.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Turner S, Higginson J, Oborne CA, Thomas RE, Ramsay AI, Fulop NJ. Codifying knowledge to improve patient safety: a qualitative study of practice-based interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2014;113:169–76.CrossRefPubMed Turner S, Higginson J, Oborne CA, Thomas RE, Ramsay AI, Fulop NJ. Codifying knowledge to improve patient safety: a qualitative study of practice-based interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2014;113:169–76.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lowson K, Jenks M, Filby A, Carr L, Campbell B, Powell J. Examining the implementation of NICE guidance: cross-sectional survey of the use of NICE interventional procedures guidance by NHS Trusts. Implement Sci. 2015;10:93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lowson K, Jenks M, Filby A, Carr L, Campbell B, Powell J. Examining the implementation of NICE guidance: cross-sectional survey of the use of NICE interventional procedures guidance by NHS Trusts. Implement Sci. 2015;10:93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Davies HTO, Powell AE, Nutley SM. Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors—a multimethod mapping study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015. doi:10.3310/hsdr03270. Davies HTO, Powell AE, Nutley SM. Mobilising knowledge to improve UK health care: learning from other countries and other sectors—a multimethod mapping study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015. doi:10.​3310/​hsdr03270.
16.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:45–53.CrossRefPubMed Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:45–53.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yin RK. Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation. 2013;193:321–32.CrossRef Yin RK. Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation. 2013;193:321–32.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Morris S, Hunter R, Ramsay AIG, Boaden R, McKevitt C, Perry C, et al. Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g4757.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morris S, Hunter R, Ramsay AIG, Boaden R, McKevitt C, Perry C, et al. Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g4757.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NG12]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NG12]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015.
23.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Costing statement: suspected cancer implementing the NICE guideline on suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NG12]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Costing statement: suspected cancer implementing the NICE guideline on suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NG12]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015.
25.
go back to reference Lyratzopoulos G, Vedsted P, Singh H. Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation. Br J Cancer. 2015;112 Suppl 1:84–91.CrossRef Lyratzopoulos G, Vedsted P, Singh H. Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation. Br J Cancer. 2015;112 Suppl 1:84–91.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kotecha A, Baldwin A, Brookes J, Foster PJ. Experiences with developing and implementing a virtual clinic for glaucoma care in an NHS setting. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kotecha A, Baldwin A, Brookes J, Foster PJ. Experiences with developing and implementing a virtual clinic for glaucoma care in an NHS setting. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14:403–13.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14:403–13.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Orme BK. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. WI: LLC: Madison; 2006. Orme BK. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. WI: LLC: Madison; 2006.
30.
go back to reference Papanikolaou P, Lyne P, Ratcliffe J. Using the discrete choice experimental design to investigate decision-making about pressure ulcer prevention by community nurses. Health Social Care Comm. 2007;15:588–98.CrossRef Papanikolaou P, Lyne P, Ratcliffe J. Using the discrete choice experimental design to investigate decision-making about pressure ulcer prevention by community nurses. Health Social Care Comm. 2007;15:588–98.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kate L, Mandeville KL, Lagarde M, Hanson K. The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:367.CrossRef Kate L, Mandeville KL, Lagarde M, Hanson K. The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:367.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81:221–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81:221–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Gobo G. The next challenge: from mixed to integrated methods. Qual Res Organ Manag. 2015;10:329–31.CrossRef Gobo G. The next challenge: from mixed to integrated methods. Qual Res Organ Manag. 2015;10:329–31.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Timmermans S, Oh H. The continued social transformation of the medical profession. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl 1:94–106.CrossRef Timmermans S, Oh H. The continued social transformation of the medical profession. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl 1:94–106.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference McDonald R. Market reforms in English primary medical care: medicine, habitus and the public sphere. Sociol health Ill. 2009;31:659–72.CrossRef McDonald R. Market reforms in English primary medical care: medicine, habitus and the public sphere. Sociol health Ill. 2009;31:659–72.CrossRef
36.
Metadata
Title
Study protocol: DEcisions in health Care to Introduce or Diffuse innovations using Evidence (DECIDE)
Authors
Simon Turner
Stephen Morris
Jessica Sheringham
Emma Hudson
Naomi J. Fulop
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0412-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue