Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Short report

Elaborating on theory with middle managers’ experience implementing healthcare innovations in practice

Authors: Sarah A. Birken, Lisa D. DiMartino, Meredith A. Kirk, Shoou-Yih D. Lee, Mark McClelland, Nancy M. Albert

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The theory of middle managers’ role in implementing healthcare innovations hypothesized that middle managers influence implementation effectiveness by fulfilling the following four roles: diffusing information, synthesizing information, mediating between strategy and day-to-day activities, and selling innovation implementation. The theory also suggested several activities in which middle managers might engage to fulfill the four roles. The extent to which the theory aligns with middle managers’ experience in practice is unclear. We surveyed middle managers (n = 63) who attended a nursing innovation summit to (1) assess alignment between the theory and middle managers’ experience in practice and (2) elaborate on the theory with examples from middle managers’ experience overseeing innovation implementation in practice.

Findings

Middle managers rated all of the theory’s hypothesized four roles as “extremely important” but ranked diffusing and synthesizing information as the most important and selling innovation implementation as the least important. They reported engaging in several activities that were consistent with the theory’s hypothesized roles and activities such as diffusing information via meetings and training. They also reported engaging in activities not described in the theory such as appraising employee performance.

Conclusions

Middle managers’ experience aligned well with the theory and expanded definitions of the roles and activities that it hypothesized. Future studies should assess the relationship between hypothesized roles and the effectiveness with which innovations are implemented in practice. If evidence supports the theory, the theory should be leveraged to promote the fulfillment of hypothesized roles among middle managers, doing so may promote innovation implementation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, Chin MH, Chiu M, Schaefer CT. From strategy to action: how top managers’ support increases middle managers’ commitment to innovation implementation in health care organizations. Health Care Manage Rev. 2014;40:159–68.CrossRef Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, Chin MH, Chiu M, Schaefer CT. From strategy to action: how top managers’ support increases middle managers’ commitment to innovation implementation in health care organizations. Health Care Manage Rev. 2014;40:159–68.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, Chin MH, Schaefer CT. Improving the effectiveness of health care innovation implementation: middle managers as change agents. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70:29–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, Chin MH, Schaefer CT. Improving the effectiveness of health care innovation implementation: middle managers as change agents. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70:29–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference King N. Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research. London, England: Sage; 1998. King N. Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research. London, England: Sage; 1998.
5.
Metadata
Title
Elaborating on theory with middle managers’ experience implementing healthcare innovations in practice
Authors
Sarah A. Birken
Lisa D. DiMartino
Meredith A. Kirk
Shoou-Yih D. Lee
Mark McClelland
Nancy M. Albert
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0362-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue