Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Study protocol: identifying and delivering point-of-care information to improve care coordination

Authors: Sylvia J. Hysong, Xinxuan Che, Sallie J. Weaver, Laura A. Petersen

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The need for deliberately coordinated care is noted by many national-level organizations. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) recently transitioned primary care clinics nationwide into Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs) to provide more accessible, coordinated, comprehensive, and patient-centered care. To better serve this purpose, PACTs must be able to successfully sequence and route interdependent tasks to appropriate team members while also maintaining collective situational awareness (coordination).
Although conceptual frameworks of care coordination exist, few explicitly articulate core behavioral markers of coordination or the related information needs of team members attempting to synchronize complex care processes across time for a shared patient population. Given this gap, we partnered with a group of frontline primary care personnel at ambulatory care sites to identify the specific information needs of PACT members that will enable them to coordinate their efforts to provide effective, coordinated care. The study has three objectives: (1) development of measurable, prioritized point-of-care criteria for effective PACT coordination; (2) identifying the specific information needed at the point of care to optimize coordination; and (3) assessing the effect of adopting the aforementioned coordination standards on PACT clinicians’ coordination behaviors.

Methods/design

The study consists of three phases. In phase 1, we will employ the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System (ProMES), a structured approach to performance measure creation from industrial/organizational psychology, to develop coordination measures with a design team of 6–10 primary care personnel; in phase 2, we will conduct focus groups with the phase 1 design team to identify point-of-care information needs. Phase 3 is a two-arm field experiment (nPACT = 28/arm); intervention arm PACTs will receive monthly feedback reports using the measures developed in phase 1 and attend brief monthly feedback sessions. Control arm PACTs will receive no intervention. PACTs will be followed prospectively for up to 1 year.

Discussion

This project combines both action research and implementation science methods to address important gaps in the existing care coordination literature using a partnership-based research design. It will provide an evidence-based framework for care coordination by employing a structured methodology for a systematic approach to care coordination in PACT settings and identifying the information needs that produce the most successful coordination of care.

Trial registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2006. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
2.
go back to reference McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, Lewis R, Lin N, Kraft S, et al. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. Vol 7 -- Care Coordination. Volume 04(07)-005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD; 2007. McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, Lewis R, Lin N, Kraft S, et al. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. Vol 7 -- Care Coordination. Volume 04(07)-005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD; 2007.
4.
go back to reference Hysong SJ. Organizational Correlates of Outpatient Performance Trends in VAMCs. Annu Career Dev Meet Veterans Adm Heal Serv Res Dev Serv. Washington, DC; 2011 Hysong SJ. Organizational Correlates of Outpatient Performance Trends in VAMCs. Annu Career Dev Meet Veterans Adm Heal Serv Res Dev Serv. Washington, DC; 2011
5.
go back to reference Hysong SJ, Esquivel A, Sittig DF, Paul LA, Espadas D, Singh S, et al. Toward successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011;6. Hysong SJ, Esquivel A, Sittig DF, Paul LA, Espadas D, Singh S, et al. Toward successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011;6.
6.
7.
go back to reference Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA. Coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective. Acad Manag Ann. 2009;3:463–502.CrossRef Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA. Coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective. Acad Manag Ann. 2009;3:463–502.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stille CJ, Jerant A, Bell D, Meltzer D, Elmore JG. Coordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:700–8.CrossRefPubMed Stille CJ, Jerant A, Bell D, Meltzer D, Elmore JG. Coordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:700–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Forrest CB, Glade GB, Baker AE, Bocian A, von Schrader S, Starfield B. Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:499–506.CrossRefPubMed Forrest CB, Glade GB, Baker AE, Bocian A, von Schrader S, Starfield B. Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:499–506.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Berendsen AJ, de Jong GM, Meyboom-de Jong B, Dekker JH, Schuling J. Transition of care: experiences and preferences of patients across the primary/secondary interface—a qualitative study. BMC Heal Serv Res. 2009;9:62.CrossRef Berendsen AJ, de Jong GM, Meyboom-de Jong B, Dekker JH, Schuling J. Transition of care: experiences and preferences of patients across the primary/secondary interface—a qualitative study. BMC Heal Serv Res. 2009;9:62.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bal R, Mastboom F, Spiers HP, Rutten H. The product and process of referral: optimizing general practitioner-medical specialist interaction through information technology. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76 Suppl 1:S28–34.CrossRefPubMed Bal R, Mastboom F, Spiers HP, Rutten H. The product and process of referral: optimizing general practitioner-medical specialist interaction through information technology. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76 Suppl 1:S28–34.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Salas E, Sims DE, Burke CS. Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Gr Res. 2005;36:555–99.CrossRef Salas E, Sims DE, Burke CS. Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Gr Res. 2005;36:555–99.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Marks MA, Panzer FJ. The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Hum Perform. 2004;17:25–41.CrossRef Marks MA, Panzer FJ. The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Hum Perform. 2004;17:25–41.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stout RJ, Salas E, Carson R. Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: what’s important for team functioning? Mil Psychol. 1994;6:177–92.CrossRef Stout RJ, Salas E, Carson R. Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: what’s important for team functioning? Mil Psychol. 1994;6:177–92.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Taplin SH, Weaver S, Salas E, Chollette V, Edwards HM, Bruinooge SS, et al. Reviewing Cancer Care Team Effectiveness. J Oncol Pract. 2015:JOP.2014.003350–. Taplin SH, Weaver S, Salas E, Chollette V, Edwards HM, Bruinooge SS, et al. Reviewing Cancer Care Team Effectiveness. J Oncol Pract. 2015:JOP.2014.003350–.
19.
go back to reference Pritchard RD, Harrell MM, Diaz-Granados D, Guzman MJ. The productivity measurement and enhancement system: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93:540–67.CrossRefPubMed Pritchard RD, Harrell MM, Diaz-Granados D, Guzman MJ. The productivity measurement and enhancement system: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93:540–67.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pritchard RD. Enhancing work motivation through productivity measurement and feedback. In: Kleinbeck U, Quast HH, Thierry H, Haecker H, editors. Work Motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1990. p. 119–32. Pritchard RD. Enhancing work motivation through productivity measurement and feedback. In: Kleinbeck U, Quast HH, Thierry H, Haecker H, editors. Work Motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1990. p. 119–32.
21.
22.
go back to reference Barbour R. Doing focus groups. London: Sage; 2008. Barbour R. Doing focus groups. London: Sage; 2008.
23.
go back to reference Pritchard RD, Weaver SJ, Ashwood EL. Evidence-based productivity improvement: a practical guide to the productivity measurement and enhancement system. New York: Routledge Academic; 2011. Pritchard RD, Weaver SJ, Ashwood EL. Evidence-based productivity improvement: a practical guide to the productivity measurement and enhancement system. New York: Routledge Academic; 2011.
24.
go back to reference Naylor JC, Pritchard RD, Ilgen DR. A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press; 1980. Naylor JC, Pritchard RD, Ilgen DR. A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press; 1980.
25.
go back to reference Pritchard RD, Ashwood EL. Managing motivation: a manager’s guide to diagnosing and improving motivation. New York: LEA/Psychology Press; 2007. Pritchard RD, Ashwood EL. Managing motivation: a manager’s guide to diagnosing and improving motivation. New York: LEA/Psychology Press; 2007.
27.
go back to reference Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254–84.CrossRef Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254–84.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Raudenbush S. Optimal design for multilevel longitudinal research. 2006. Raudenbush S. Optimal design for multilevel longitudinal research. 2006.
29.
go back to reference Kleingeld AD, Van Tuijl H, Algera JA. Participation in the design of performance management systems: a quasi-experimental field study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25:831–51.CrossRef Kleingeld AD, Van Tuijl H, Algera JA. Participation in the design of performance management systems: a quasi-experimental field study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25:831–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Study protocol: identifying and delivering point-of-care information to improve care coordination
Authors
Sylvia J. Hysong
Xinxuan Che
Sallie J. Weaver
Laura A. Petersen
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0335-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue