Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records

Authors: Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Hardeep Singh, David Reeves, Jill Stocks, Morris Rebecca, Aneez Esmail, Stephen Campbell, Carl de Wet

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient safety research has focused largely on hospital settings despite the fact that in many countries, the majority of patient contacts are in primary care. The knowledge base about patient safety in primary care is developing but sparse and diagnostic error is a relatively understudied and an unmeasured area of patient safety. Diagnostic error rates vary according to how ‘error’ is defined but one suggested hallmark is clear evidence of ‘missed opportunity’ (MDOs) makes a correct or timely diagnosis to prevent them. While there is no agreed definition or method of measuring MDOs, retrospective manual chart or patient record reviews are a ‘gold standard’. This study protocol aims to (1) determine the incidence of MDOs in English general practice, (2) identify the confounding and contributing factors that lead to MDOs and (3) determine the (potential) impact of the detected MDOs on patients.

Methods/Design

We plan to conduct a two-phase retrospective review of electronic health records in the Greater Manchester (GM) area of the UK. In the first phase, clinician reviewers will calibrate their performance in identifying and assessing MDOs against a gold standard ‘primary reviewer’ through the use of ‘double’ reviews of records. The findings will enable a preliminary estimate of the incidence of MDOs in general practice, which will be used to calculate the number of records to be reviewed in the second phase in order to estimate the true incidence of MDO in general practice. A sample of 15 general practices is required for phase 1 and up to 35 practices for phase 2. In each practice, the sample will consist of 100 patients aged ≥18 years on 1 April 2013 who have attended a face-to-face ‘index consultation’ between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015. The index consultation will be selected randomly from each unique patient record, occurring between 1 July 2013 and 30 June 2014.

Discussion

There are no reliable estimates of safety problems related to diagnosis in English general practice. This study will lay the foundation for safety improvements in this area by providing a more reliable estimate of MDOs, their impact and their contributory factors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000.
2.
go back to reference Wynia MK, Classen DC. Improving ambulatory patient safety: learning from the last decade, moving ahead in the next. JAMA. 2011;306:2504–5.CrossRefPubMed Wynia MK, Classen DC. Improving ambulatory patient safety: learning from the last decade, moving ahead in the next. JAMA. 2011;306:2504–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lorincz CY, Drazen E, Sokol PE, Neerukonda KV, Metzger J, Toepp MC, et al. Research in ambulatory patient safety 2000–2010: a 10-year review. Chicago IL: American Medical Association; 2011. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/go/patientsafety. Lorincz CY, Drazen E, Sokol PE, Neerukonda KV, Metzger J, Toepp MC, et al. Research in ambulatory patient safety 2000–2010: a 10-year review. Chicago IL: American Medical Association; 2011. Available at: www.​ama-assn.​org/​go/​patientsafety.
7.
go back to reference Hardeep S, Sittig DF. Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: ‘Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors’ by Dr Richard Young. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004140. Hardeep S, Sittig DF. Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: ‘Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors’ by Dr Richard Young. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004140.
8.
go back to reference Sandars J, Esmail A. The frequency and nature of medical error in primary care: understanding the diversity across studies. BMC Fam Pract. 2003;20:231–6.CrossRef Sandars J, Esmail A. The frequency and nature of medical error in primary care: understanding the diversity across studies. BMC Fam Pract. 2003;20:231–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Saber Tehrani AS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, et al. 25-year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(8):672–80.CrossRefPubMed Saber Tehrani AS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, et al. 25-year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(8):672–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Graber ML. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:106–13.PubMed Graber ML. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:106–13.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Newman-Toker DE, McDonald KM, Meltzer DO. How much diagnostic safety can we afford, and how should we decide? A health economics perspective. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii11–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Newman-Toker DE, McDonald KM, Meltzer DO. How much diagnostic safety can we afford, and how should we decide? A health economics perspective. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii11–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Phillips RL, Bartholomew LA, Dovey SM, Fryer GE, Miyoshi TJ, Green LA. Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004;13:121–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Phillips RL, Bartholomew LA, Dovey SM, Fryer GE, Miyoshi TJ, Green LA. Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004;13:121–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1493–9.CrossRefPubMed Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1493–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, van der Wal G. Timmermans DlRM. Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2012;87. Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, van der Wal G. Timmermans DlRM. Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2012;87.
16.
go back to reference Singh H. Helping organizations with defining diagnostic errors as missed opportunities in diagnosis. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40:99–102.PubMed Singh H. Helping organizations with defining diagnostic errors as missed opportunities in diagnosis. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40:99–102.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Singh H, Weingart S. Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategies. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:57–61.CrossRef Singh H, Weingart S. Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategies. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:57–61.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Silk N. What went wrong in 1000 negligence claims. Health care risk report. London: Medical Protection Society; 2000. Silk N. What went wrong in 1000 negligence claims. Health care risk report. London: Medical Protection Society; 2000.
19.
go back to reference Kostopoulou O, Delaney BC, Munro CW. Diagnostic difficulty and error in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;25:400–13.CrossRef Kostopoulou O, Delaney BC, Munro CW. Diagnostic difficulty and error in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;25:400–13.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Singh H, Giardina T, Forjuoh S, Reid M, Kosmach S, Khan M, et al. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2012;21:93–100.CrossRefPubMed Singh H, Giardina T, Forjuoh S, Reid M, Kosmach S, Khan M, et al. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2012;21:93–100.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Singh H, Giardina T, Meyer AD, Forjuoh SN, Reis MD, Thomas EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2013;173:418–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh H, Giardina T, Meyer AD, Forjuoh SN, Reis MD, Thomas EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2013;173:418–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Vincent C, Aylin P, Franklin B, Holmes A, Iskander S, Jacklin A, et al. Is health care getting safer? BMJ. 2008;337:a2426.CrossRefPubMed Vincent C, Aylin P, Franklin B, Holmes A, Iskander S, Jacklin A, et al. Is health care getting safer? BMJ. 2008;337:a2426.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Amalberti R, Vincent C, Auroy Y, de Saint Maurice G. Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management. QSHC. 2006;15(suppl_1):i66–71. Amalberti R, Vincent C, Auroy Y, de Saint Maurice G. Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management. QSHC. 2006;15(suppl_1):i66–71.
Metadata
Title
Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records
Authors
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi
Hardeep Singh
David Reeves
Jill Stocks
Morris Rebecca
Aneez Esmail
Stephen Campbell
Carl de Wet
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0296-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue